Soderling +400 looks like a GREAT shot

**Brock Landers** · 06-01-10, 01:23 PM

Originally posted by shari91

Wait a minute. Did you back Lawnboy, Brock?

yep...I posted the info on the matchup from a site i saw, but i took the +400, Tennis is ALL about dog betting, fuk the faves, lose way too often.

LOVE Stosur tomorrow vs big

Serena

**big0mar** · 06-01-10, 01:29 PM

Nice hit Brock!

**jayc88** · 06-01-10, 01:30 PM

soderling is a -190 fav in the semis against berdych

**actionaddict86** · 06-01-10, 01:31 PM

Fed goin edge

**Brock Landers** · 06-01-10, 01:34 PM

Gotta bet against Nadal too...at the dog prices posted, you can make a fortune for 50 bux

**jjgold** · 06-01-10, 02:14 PM

Nadal is a different animal

he is greatest clay court player if all times.

Fed is a good clay court player but very beatable

Bad bet Brock

**suckerforparlays** · 06-01-10, 02:15 PM

sick call man

**swiss88** · 06-01-10, 02:32 PM

I still can't believe how great Soderling played today.
After set 1, Federer never found the solutions to counter the power and the accuracy of Soderling's shots... If there is a Nadal-Soderling rematch in finale, I really think Soderling has good chances to beat Nadal if he stays at this level of play...

**Unicorn7** · 06-01-10, 02:32 PM

brock predicted federer so whats the fuss?..He gave us all a loser

just like the resident tennis expert yisman

nice thread though guys good to see such enthusiasm for tennis here

as usual the mexican stallion is correct

**jjgold** · 06-01-10, 02:38 PM

Soderling spotted Fed 2 sets at last years open and lost in 5.

**Irish Jet** · 06-01-10, 03:35 PM

Awesome.

I didn't like +400, when it became obvious Soderling was looking good, even a set down, it looked good at +1000 and then again at +1200.

Great call Brock though, even up a set I always felt Fed would come back. Tennis dogs FTW!

**constrictor** · 06-01-10, 03:51 PM

way to go and remember to keep it up

**Brock Landers** · 06-01-10, 03:54 PM

Originally posted by Unicorn7

brock predicted federer so whats the fuss?..He gave us all a loser just like the resident tennis expert yisman nice thread though guys good to see such enthusiasm for tennis here as usual the mexican stallion is correct

no i didn't, i started the thread because the play was Soderling +400..i posted a matchup ANALYSIS, not my pick at the start. Why would i start a thread about a guy being +400 then bet the other side? LOL

**yisman** · 06-01-10, 03:55 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Brock it sounds like you've never watched tennis before. "Winner of this set takes it all?" Sod can be up 2-0 and 5-0 in the third set and Fed will still beat him.

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Soderling will lose this set guaranteed.

So much for that.

**BeatTheJerk** · 06-01-10, 03:58 PM

So let me get this straight. Brock pointed out that +400 for Soderling looks like a great bet, but then backs out of his prediction by stating Roger will win in 5 games, and now since it went final Brock flip-flopped his pick and said he did in fact take Soderling at +400 and now everyone is basically just reading the title of the thread and is congratulating him on a bet he probably never made ? Did I miss anything ...............

**yisman** · 06-01-10, 04:00 PM

It sounded to me like he was recommending Soderling even though he thought Federer would win.

**BeatTheJerk** · 06-01-10, 04:02 PM

Brock show the bet and shut us all up. That's all he needs to do ................. Even if you only had 10 bucks on it.

**Goat Milk** · 06-01-10, 04:17 PM

Originally posted by yisman

It sounded to me like he was recommending Soderling even though he thought Federer would win.

Yisman, next time I'm going to bump your bad calls. Like the baseball one I saw you make yesterday. Don't get smart with me Yisman. I will destroy any one of your basketball comments you made but I haven't so just watch your step.

**ngates815** · 06-01-10, 04:24 PM

Originally posted by yisman

It sounded to me like he was recommending Soderling even though he thought Federer would win.

Thats a pretty good recommendation right? I'm gonna recommend that you take Boston for series, though I think the Lakers win in 5. So you can bump this thread when the series is over, and who really knows what side I played, or if I played any...sorta like Brock.

**Brock Landers** · 06-01-10, 04:27 PM

i picked and played SODERLING...Pointed out the numbers so you could see for yourselves...and decide from there, play was always on SODERLING +400

**yisman** · 06-01-10, 04:29 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Yisman, next time I'm going to bump your bad calls. Like the baseball one I saw you make yesterday. Don't get smart with me Yisman. I will destroy any one of your basketball comments you made but I haven't so just watch your step.

Don't threaten me. You are clueless about tennis and you showed everyone here as much.

Nice of you to disappear from the thread after guaranteeing Federer would win.

**Extra Innings** · 06-01-10, 04:29 PM

Brock Landers brings out the jealousy. Do your thing Landers

**Goat Milk** · 06-01-10, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by yisman

Don't threaten me. You are clueless about tennis and you showed everyone here as much.

Nice of you to disappear from the thread after guaranteeing Federer would win.

Sorry some people got to work. And I didn't guarantee Federer would win, I guaranteed he'd win the 4th set. Big difference. I showed everyone I'm clueless about tennis? Keep thinking that pal.

I'm not threatening you, I'm telling you. Next time you make a comment in NBA threads and I see it, I'm going to put your argument to shame. Should I go and bump your baseball thread from yesterday where you challenged people points that the Rays would win?

**yisman** · 06-01-10, 04:37 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Sorry some people got to work. And I didn't guarantee Federer would win, I guaranteed he'd win the 4th set. Big difference. I showed everyone I'm clueless about tennis? Keep thinking that pal.

I'm not threatening you, I'm telling you. Next time you make a comment in NBA threads and I see it, I'm going to put your argument to shame. Should I go and bump your baseball thread from yesterday where you challenged people points that the Rays would win?

I offered two bets yesterday. One won and won lost. I don't claim to win all my bets.

You guaranteed Federer would win. That's the difference. I don't make guarantees because I am sensible.

**OverUnder** · 06-01-10, 04:38 PM

Goat Milk

Brock

**LLXC** · 06-01-10, 04:46 PM

Nice call.

**charley1** · 06-01-10, 06:03 PM

amazing game!!

**Ced's shadow** · 06-01-10, 06:11 PM

**Brock Landers** · 06-01-10, 11:36 PM

Stosur +200 tomorrow!

**shari91** · 06-01-10, 11:43 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

Stosur +200 tomorrow!

Yes.

**PAYTON20** · 06-01-10, 11:50 PM

the fact that Brock even posted a thread saying Soderling was worth a shot deserves come credit. I didn't see anyone else say this... so congrats Brock

**Mthorn** · 06-02-10, 02:54 AM

great call, i also went with sodeling

**Bigmikesm** · 06-02-10, 03:07 AM

Brock is getting back on top again! GREAT call!!!

**althelegend** · 06-02-10, 05:49 AM

Well done soderling backers and op. I'm not sure many agreed with you, but fair play, he deserved his win and Fed admitted he didn't play all that badly, just that Soderling was superb.