if you bet the JETS moneyline today

big joe 1212 · 01-17-10, 08:20 PM

sorry you lost your ass!

WhatAboutMeBitch · 01-17-10, 08:20 PM

I mean I feel lucky, but +330 lucky is not as lucky as 1 in 1 billion lucky. thanks for the advice though. But then again, I'm pretty sure a +300 dog wins in some professional or college sport everyday, so its not like we witnessed water being turned into wine.

20Four7 · 01-17-10, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by hoopster42

go buy a lottery ticket because you're just plain lucky that Nate missed 3 fg's

go buy the lottery ticket because all you're gona do is give your winnings back to the books anyways

I wished he had hit them then I would have gone perfect in the props for the game. I was over 3.5 for field goals for the game. BTW I also had jets ML at +330, plus jets +8, with a little jets +9 that I got upon opening.

slacker00 · 01-17-10, 08:25 PM

What if I had the Jets on the spread? Was that lucky or sharp?

Dunder · 01-17-10, 08:26 PM

Well I didn´t have the ML and after 6 possesions and 6 punts and then a terrible call (not a fumble, pffft) from the officials - I thought my ATS bet was probably a loser. But the Jets really dug in (as we expected them to) and the Chargers crumbled (as we half expected them to). End of story.

big joe 1212 · 01-17-10, 08:28 PM

Originally posted by Dunder

Well I didn´t have the ML and after 6 possesions and 6 punts and then a terrible call (not a fumble, pffft) from the officials - I thought my ATS bet was probably a loser. But the Jets really dug in (as we expected them to) and the Chargers crumbled (as we half expected them to). End of story.

Joe Dogs · 01-17-10, 08:28 PM

Now thats what I call brass balls....Nice call

gambleballs · 01-17-10, 08:32 PM

Originally posted by hoopster42

all you're gona do is give your winnings back to the books anyways

Wanna bet?

hoopster42 · 01-18-10, 03:54 AM

Glitch · 01-18-10, 04:09 AM

they ran the clock out at the end instead of trying to score so who knows- chargers couldnt do anything against them so i think they were comfortable at 17 points.

people been listing numerous reasons why the jets should win all week long. sorry you gave up points or took an ugly moneyline against the number 1 defense in the league.

Busterflywheel · 01-18-10, 06:12 AM

Originally posted by hoopster42

go buy a lottery ticket because you're just plain lucky that Nate missed 3 fg's

go buy the lottery ticket because all you're gona do is give your winnings back to the books anyways

They got away with a game of Russian Roulette..

I did have them +9

hoopster42 · 01-19-10, 03:56 AM

Originally posted by Busterflywheel

They got away with a game of Russian Roulette..

I did have them +9

a man who knows the team got lucky to win straight up

you're on a different level than the 98% of dumbass pissants who bet and lose each yr

andywend · 01-19-10, 04:01 AM

At kickoff, the Chargers were -360 with the Jets at +350 @ Matchbook.

Laying -360 with the Chargers was insane.

Hoopster, anyone who took the Chargers straight up while laying almost 4 to 1 deserved exactly what they got and that most certainly includes you.

xxdjstriderxx · 01-19-10, 04:17 AM

Originally posted by andywend

At kickoff, the Chargers were -360 with the Jets at +350 @ Matchbook.

Laying -360 with the Chargers was insane.

Hoopster, anyone who took the Chargers straight up while laying almost 4 to 1 deserved exactly what they got and that most certainly includes you.

xxdjstriderxx · 01-19-10, 04:21 AM

yes, jets may have gotten lucky to win.

but getting away with a "LUCKY" win, signifies a close game, which either team could have won.

with that being said, laying 3.5 to 1 or the 9 point chalk on a close game was apparently the stupid thing to do

and if you were expecting a one sided affair/blowout, you obviously need to do your homework

The General · 01-19-10, 04:23 AM

Originally posted by andywend

At kickoff, the Chargers were -360 with the Jets at +350 @ Matchbook.

Laying -360 with the Chargers was insane.

Hoopster, anyone who took the Chargers straight up while laying almost 4 to 1 deserved exactly what they got and that most certainly includes you.

At this time of year and really anytime during the season, laying 360 is nutz.

WINGZ · 01-19-10, 04:28 AM

beware the j-e-t-s D Peyton

hoopster42 · 01-19-10, 04:46 AM

i had the chargers -2 on 2nd leg of a 2-team teaser

if they played the gm 10 times, the chargers win 8 of the 10 by 3 pts or more

period. end of discussion.

fukk everybody

Shelton · 01-19-10, 04:56 AM

D-fence wins championships pressure gets to payton

andywend · 01-19-10, 05:15 AM

if they played the gm 10 times, the chargers win 8 of the 10 by 3 pts or more

Where did you come up with this gem?

G's pks · 01-19-10, 09:17 AM

Making a thread like this....you better be right or your open the flood gates...

hoopster42 · 01-24-10, 05:47 PM

Step the fukk off

The Seer · 01-24-10, 05:56 PM

Originally posted by Shelton

D-fence wins championships pressure gets to payton

PAULYPOKER · 01-24-10, 06:02 PM

Colts TD to Garcon was not a catch

Go to NFL.com to watch the replay of the Manning to Pierre Garcon and you will see as clear as day that this catch was not a Touchdown his left foot landed on his right lower calf and then swung back around to his left landing clearly out of bounds of the end-zone My question is why the fukk wasn't this challenged

hoopster42 · 01-25-10, 03:51 PM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

Colts TD to Garcon was not a catch

Go to NFL.com to watch the replay of the Manning to Pierre Garcon and you will see as clear as day that this catch was not a Touchdown his left foot landed on his right lower calf and then swung back around to his left landing clearly out of bounds of the end-zone My question is why the fukk wasn't this challenged

wrong.

just as the ball hit his hands and he gripped it, his left foot dragged on the toes and his right foot landed flush inbounds. then, the after his left toes touched, his left foot came back in the air and then hit his calf, then landed out of bounds.

TOUCHDOWN. clearly.