Anyone else thinking of playing exclusively at Rebatewager in 2010?

[Nicky Santoro]

Come on F0cker. Can you not be a weasel and just abide by these rules? The contest hasn't even started yet.

If you are going to play -140 favorites then this is all bullshit...and congrats, I guess.

you my friend are a good guy.. that's why i've always liked you.. you have class, unlike this guy trying to weasel out and scam rw out of 1k. they were nice to offer it to him and look what he does. he grabs that free 1k as fast as he can.. he is laughing at rw now..

[xxdjstriderxx]

i already play there

[durito]

you my friend are a good guy.. that's why i've always liked you.. you have class, unlike this guy trying to weasel out and scam rw out of 1k. they were nice to offer it to him and look what he does. he grabs that free 1k as fast as he can.. he is laughing at rw now..

Rebate wager has said totals are ok, he is not scamming, but playing smart to win.

You on the other hand, have straight up scammed numerous sportsbooks. OR have you not?

[onthewhat]

I'd feel guilty if I just stole money from Rebatewager by playing -150 NHL totals....

Monkey just play NBA, NFL, NCAAB, NCAAF sides and totals. Cancel the 3 NHL totals you already made.

[jjgold]

Relax men, its early in the contest, plenty of -140's lose.

[onthewhat]

Rebate wager has said totals are ok, he is not scamming, but playing smart to win.

You on the other hand, have straight up scammed numerous sportsbooks. OR have you not?

It just says a lot about a person if they take advantage of someone offering a generous contest and plays -150 totals.

I'd rather play -110's and lose than play -150's and win.

[onthewhat]

Relax men, its early in the contest, plenty of -140's lose.

50% don't.

[Nicky Santoro]

Rebate wager has said totals are ok, he is not scamming, but playing smart to win.

You on the other hand, have straight up scammed numerous sportsbooks. OR have you not?

never have scammed anyone.. and never will.. and NHL totals are stealing and he knows it. when you lay -145 on a total, and lay 0, that's stealing. the least he can do is play flat pick ems.. no need to abuse this. .it doesn't surprise me that he does this.. he's that type of guy.. probably the type that would steal an old lady's purse for 40 bucks.

[lakerboy]

Who cares what he plays. If they want to give him free money why shouldnt he take it.

[durito]

It just says a lot about a person if they take advantage of someone offering a generous contest and plays -150 totals.

I'd rather play -110's and lose than play -150's and win.

Then you are an idiot. They said it was ok.


Next time I find a book with a good number should I not bet it? What's the difference?

[flyingillini]

Just as long as this doesn't turn into what BFC did on the forum. Ha

[MonkeyF0cker]

Dec 28 719 BOWLING GREEN +19-110
7:00PM 720 TEMPLE

[Nicky Santoro]

Then you are an idiot. They said it was ok.


Next time I find a book with a good number should I not bet it? What's the difference?

this is not about betting against a book for real money. he is not putting up any cash.. it's a free shot.. and what does he do?? he cheats.. he breaks the rules.. guy said only spreads. he takes full adv of this...what does he do, he bets -145's.. maybe you are clueless, i don't know.. but in my book, that's cheating. that's fukkin stealing.. if he don't hit 55% or better, he's a loser..

[onthewhat]

Then you are an idiot. They said it was ok.


Next time I find a book with a good number should I not bet it? What's the difference?

I never said he wasn't playing by the rules. I said I'd have a guilty conscience if I won that way. I just said it says a lot about a person if they have to cut corners and take advantage of a loophole in a free contest.

[flyingillini]

Jesus Christ Blessed your plays for today

[jellobiafra]

Relax men, its early in the contest, plenty of -140's lose.

That's not the point JJ. If this were constructed around UNITS like it should have been, then it wouldn't matter one bit. But since it's straight percentage of wins then any fair minded person would feel like a dick playing heavy ML fav's on NHL totals.

And yeah, durito the guy said it was OK because he doesn't want to come across as a douche after not specifying this in the initial offer. I think the subsequent post/offer he proposed is more indicative of what he meant originally, and if F0cker had any class he'd negate NHL totals from his plays.

[onthewhat]

Durito - what if RW gave this contest to Nicky and he started playing -140 NHL totals. You're saying you wouldn't call Nicky out on it? Of course you would.

[MonkeyF0cker]

YAWN. At least OTW and Nicky are back together again. A -140/+120 (128 no-vig) line is only 56%. You clowns act like it hits at 80%.

[onthewhat]

I'm not back with Nicky on anything. I want you to win the contest, but win it fairly.

[MonkeyF0cker]

LOL. Nicky is an admitted multi-aliasing Neteller bonus whore who violated the TOC at Rio and certainly plenty of other places and he has the audacity to call me a cheat for playing by the written rules. Unreal. LOL.

[Nicky Santoro]

That's not the point JJ. If this were constructed around UNITS like it should have been, then it wouldn't matter one bit. But since it's straight percentage of wins then any fair minded person would feel like a dick playing heavy ML fav's on NHL totals.

And yeah, durito the guy said it was OK because he doesn't want to come across as a douche after not specifying this in the initial offer. I think the subsequent post/offer he proposed is more indicative of what he meant originally, and if F0cker had any class he'd negate NHL totals from his plays.

great post again, buddy. this guy is a scumbag. you are right, the least he should do is show good faith and eliminate nhl totals. but that's what shot takers usually do. it's all about the buck.. he's got no class at all..

[onthewhat]

Nicky you claim to be some professional gambler but came running to grade 200 plays for $200...

[durito]

Nicky you claim to be some professional gambler but came running to grade 200 plays for $200...

[Nicky Santoro]

Nicky you claim to be some professional gambler but came running to grade 200 plays for $200...

just to spite you.. had you not been a jerk with me for no reason, i'd have given it to you.. but forget it now. plus, i beat you to it.:

[flyingillini]

[onthewhat]

I would have done it for free. And you're the jerk who said if I wanted the 300 pts I gave you to just ask for them back. You never gave them back because you're some broke **** who needs the points so you don't have to go get a job or some shit.

[StraitShooter]

Monkey can do as he chooses as long as he sticks to the rules. For everyone else we will try to put together a contest. Lets say 200 picks with 3 picks a day. NFL, NCAA BB/Foots and NBA sides and totals only. No hockey. In order to win you need to pick over 50% with the top 10 getting a prize. Any thoughts ?

Please overlook the excessive size of prick comparisons in this thread

speaking for the commoner on SBR..we would love it

[1st and Ten]

YAWN. At least OTW and Nicky are back together again. A -140/+120 (128 no-vig) line is only 56%. You clowns act like it hits at 80%.

[flyingillini]

I will give someone $110.00 cash if you can point out Nicky in this video, he is in it.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Dec 28 747 DENVER U +5½-110
9:00PM 748 NO. COLORADO

[pokernut9999]

People are idiots that argue with a book , do you not think that every book has a record of all their players transactions ?

They know what % bettors hit , I highly doubt Monkey will hit 50%

[jjgold]

If hitting -150 hockey totals is easy no one would work..

I would book anyone laying juice on hockey totals.

Most people are Rex bettors period and like playing at rebatewager, Jamaica and 5 Dimes. Most of the solid books are filled with Rec Bettors.

[Nicky Santoro]

If hitting -150 hockey totals is easy no one would work..

yes, when you lay -150.. but he's laying even money on a -150. .how do you think that'll work out??? every time he loses a game, he saves 50%.. do you have any idea what effect it will have now..

when laying -150, you have to win over 60% just to show a profit. now, all he has to do is win 50.1% to win 1k.. lol

[smitch124]

If hitting -150 hockey totals is easy no one would work..

I would book anyone laying juice on hockey totals.

Most people are Rex bettors period and like playing at rebatewager, Jamaica and 5 Dimes. Most of the solid books are filled with Rec Bettors.

Non sequitur post of the year

And so close to the end of it too

[Sam Odom]

If hitting -150 hockey totals is easy no one would work..

No SBR regular poster works for anyone else. We are all professional gamblers with monster cocks