If SBR wants to be fair

PAPSMEAR · 07-21-09, 07:12 AM

I think we should extend this proposed ban further to include everyone with a "v" in their name

jjgold · 07-21-09, 07:16 AM

This story is very very big

you all need to stop digging

we will handle internally

you all need to get back to your families.

pavyracer · 07-21-09, 07:20 AM

I told you a few days back this is a huge operation. There are dozen of posters at SBR involved and T was the scapegoat. You will need to clean up all the scum sooner than later.

jjgold · 07-21-09, 07:30 AM

We are in the process of eliminating in illegal booking going on here with posters. We are going to wipe it out for good.

MrMonkey · 07-21-09, 09:57 AM

[QUOTE=Chi_archie;2040059]I'm way involved.

since march or so

I'll be giving my full story late tonight, or tomorrow morn. No One cares though..... this ain't news.... there is sports and real life going on out there after all

I was breaking the rules, before John decided to make a super hard ass post..... so if i'm guilty of breaking them and worthy of a ban, so be it..... but honestly???? c'mon

Let's get some light on this bitch[/QUOTE]

and

curious · 07-21-09, 10:44 AM

SBR does not want to be fair

Since when has SBR even pretended to be fair?

jjgold · 07-21-09, 11:11 AM

There are names on the list that are mind boggling

BWINcomFraud · 07-21-09, 11:56 AM

Bullshit!
If bookmaker has anything to prove it's case, let them have one employee who will represent them on SBR.
They don't care about SBR and they know, that they have dirty faces (bookmakers who are trashed on SBR) against many of this complaints. That's my point.

sickler · 07-21-09, 11:57 AM

pavyracer · 07-21-09, 11:58 AM

Originally posted by BWINcomFraud

Bullshit!
If bookmaker has anything to prove it's case, let them have one employee who will represent them on SBR.
They don't care about SBR and they know, that they have dirty faces (bookmakers who are trashed on SBR) against many of this complaints. That's my point.

Relax amigo. The whole universe doesn't revolve around bwin. We are talking about forum bookies here who eat at McDonald's.

sickler · 07-21-09, 11:58 AM

Originally posted by BWINcomFraud

Bullshit!
If bookmaker has anything to prove it's case, let them have one employee who will represent them on SBR.
They don't care about SBR and they know, that they have dirty faces (bookmakers who are trashed on SBR) against many of this complaints. That's my point.

Dude, this is an in-house situation.

jjgold · 07-21-09, 12:19 PM

Could be a list released tonight, some surprising names.

tacomax · 07-21-09, 12:22 PM

Originally posted by curious

Since when has SBR even pretended to be fair?

Nothing has changed on SBR, the mods still protect their pets at other's expense.

unknown Gambler · 07-21-09, 12:32 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

I'm way involved.

since march or so

I'll be giving my full story late tonight, or tomorrow morn. No One cares though..... this ain't news.... there is sports and real life going on out there after all

I was breaking the rules, before John decided to make a super hard ass post..... so if i'm guilty of breaking them and worthy of a ban, so be it..... but honestly???? c'mon

Let's get some light on this bitch

I see Chi archie has not yet finished his speech, must be in the polishing stages.

sickler · 07-21-09, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by tacomax

Nothing has changed on SBR, the mods still protect their pets at other's expense.

This appears to be a catch-phrase, one I don't quite get.

When used yesterday in this thread :http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...y-soprano.html , I took it as an original remark to my post.

Care to enlighten me, Taco? Is curious the butt of this one?

tacomax · 07-21-09, 12:47 PM

Originally posted by sickler

This appears to be a catch-phrase, one I don't quite get.

When used yesterday in this thread :http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...y-soprano.html , I took it as an original remark to my post.

Care to enlighten me, Taco? Is curious the butt of this one?

You need to visit the PZ more often.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/private-zone/200343-nothing-has-changed-sbr-mods-still-protect-their-pets-others-expense.html

sickler · 07-21-09, 12:56 PM

Originally posted by tacomax

You need to visit the PZ more often.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/private-zo...s-expense.html

Although it may have looked like my comment was in reference to that thread, it wasn't.

jjgold · 07-21-09, 01:27 PM

Who is not involved?

sickler · 07-21-09, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

Who is not involved?

My hands are clean.

Bread · 07-21-09, 01:43 PM

Sickler, keep up son. And take a shower while you're at it because you STINK!

(Don't get mad. That's another PZ catch phrase)

Chi_archie · 07-21-09, 02:13 PM

I'll check back in a few hrs and try to log in and see if i'm banned.... I've done and undefendable thing, I've created my own prison and made my jail bed....

MrMonkey · 07-21-09, 02:27 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

Could be a list released tonight, some surprising
names.

Probably be for the best to end all of the rumors swirling around! If not, this might linger on and be bumped at any time in the future? Let it come from the SBR in charge and then we can trust what is written! IMO, people should be given a second chance! T as much as it looks like was made an example of, probably was given enough chances to stop whatever he was doing! Lifetime ban had to be the last thing they wanted to do, especially with a vet like T! Feel sorry for him, but if ban is lifted that what is the purpose of a lifetime ban!

As I wrote before, A STIFF IS A STIFF ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE! I always believed in the practice of not lending or borrowing in any betting situation! Guess I am from the old school of cash and carry! Plastic in the hands of kids or the undisciplined is deadly!!!

There are favs in every walk of life, so nobody should be pissed at SBR for decisions they make that seem not right! Just in this case for credibility sake, IMO the guilty should be punished in some way no matter who they are! I think this is all Pavy is looking for and I for one agree!

pavyracer · 07-21-09, 02:31 PM

MrMonkey,

It takes two to tango. Both parties engaging in illegal activities should be disciplined in some sort of a punishment for breaking a zero tolerance policy. The extent of the punishment is up to the judge but the jury has already spoken.

jjgold · 07-21-09, 02:36 PM

The list is not a stiff list but a combo of anyone who even discussed forum bookmaking whether he bet, booked, just talked about it, checked out website, ect. It does not mean parties involved were bad. It is th. Biggest scandal ever to hit sbr.

Bread · 07-21-09, 02:39 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

The list is not a stiff list but a combo of anyone who even discussed forum bookmaking whether he bet, booked, just talked about it, checked out website, ect. It does not mean parties involved were bad. It is th. Biggest scandal ever to hit sbr.

Even bigger than when the stop sign icon went missing??! HOLY COW!!!

sickler · 07-21-09, 02:40 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

The list is not a stiff list but a combo of anyone who even discussed forum bookmaking whether he bet, booked, just talked about it, checked out website, ect. It does not mean parties involved were bad. It is th. Biggest scandal ever to hit sbr.

Even a bigger scandal than your infamous full nudity pecker-grabbing vid?

yisman · 07-21-09, 03:40 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

The list is not a stiff list but a combo of anyone who even discussed forum bookmaking whether he bet, booked, just talked about it, checked out website, ect. It does not mean parties involved were bad. It is th. Biggest scandal ever to hit sbr.

You're such a drama queen. It's not even close to the biggest scandal. In fact, it barely even qualifies as a scandal.

Chi_archie · 07-21-09, 05:12 PM

well i'm still here thus far.

and I can understand if sbr wanted to clean house and ban me or others that openly broke rules that they set down for weeks and weeks after John's thread. I can understand pavy's sentiment as well. fair is fair, rules are rules. I did a bad thing, and I broke rules here. no excuses.

I think more people might tell their stories about this situation if they find out that you won't get banned for admitting you broke the rules. I know right now alot of people have been and will be laying low

for my part, I take responsiblity for what I did. I always have... I never denied what I did, I never evaded it. I was the one that put my name out there first in this situation. Does that mean i'm proud of this? not in the least

pavyracer · 07-21-09, 05:44 PM

Archie...I don't think a short term ban will stain anyone's reputation or carry any points like a driver's license. Anyone remember FiveTeamer? Guy was banned every other week for a few months without doing anything and now he is totally gone. Also madmaxx was banned once for making VegasDave cry in chat room. He is back now. Even Bread was banned briefly when he was drunk one night and RogueScholar was banned 10 days for an avatar. None of these banishments were warranted compared with what was going on here behind SBR's back. So do not take it personally if SBR decides to throw a penalty. People come back stronger after they do time and become better people.