Math in gambling

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jjgold
    replied
    All math now I know how many squares are here

    Leave a comment:


  • wolly
    replied
    Originally posted by SharpAngles
    Math is extremely overrated in gambling. Every advanced mathematics degree in the world will not help if you can’t recognize situational spots the oddsmakers use to set the lines.
    So,all these mathematics formulas are totally useless in betting(poker and blackjack included)? I remember that there were winners by these formulas in poker or blackjack(when there were some MIT students)

    Leave a comment:


  • Cuse0323
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    3) people that bet based on their overall knowledge of a sport. these people are generally win because they are clever so math is not particularly important. this is the hardest way to win but the most realistic for the average person



    stupidest thing I ever read


    I was hoping he was being sarcastic. I’m number 3, but we don’t generally win. I probably actually pick more winners than losers barely, but I’m an allin bettor so doesn’t mean jack.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    3) people that bet based on their overall knowledge of a sport. these people are generally win because they are clever so math is not particularly important. this is the hardest way to win but the most realistic for the average person



    stupidest thing I ever read

    Leave a comment:


  • danshan11
    replied
    Originally posted by bettingman6
    I think a vast majority of math nerds are losers in sports betting. Look at all the people on here who have their own complex systems but still only hit 50%.

    I’d say that about 10% of math nerds win long term at sports betting, and about 1% of people who aren’t math nerds win long term.
    those numbers are crazy high,
    advanced bettors (modelers, math nerds, I say 1% of total advanced bettors win long term
    non-math nerds non-modelers win about .1% win long term

    most people count a long term winner as someone who wins over like 1000 games and that is super super low to call someone skilled.
    1000 records leave tons of space for survivorship bias.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cuse0323
    replied
    Originally posted by bettingman6
    I think a vast majority of math nerds are losers in sports betting. Look at all the people on here who have their own complex systems but still only hit 50%.

    I’d say that about 10% of math nerds win long term at sports betting, and about 1% of people who aren’t math nerds win long term.
    You’re right. They lose like the rest of us. Just have a slightly better chance of winning.

    Leave a comment:


  • bettingman6
    replied
    Originally posted by Cuse0323
    Math nerds are the guys who win, but don’t have as much fun. But they have the money so they are victorious over degenerates like me.
    I think a vast majority of math nerds are losers in sports betting. Look at all the people on here who have their own complex systems but still only hit 50%.

    I’d say that about 10% of math nerds win long term at sports betting, and about 1% of people who aren’t math nerds win long term.

    Leave a comment:


  • danshan11
    replied
    Originally posted by SharpAngles
    Math is extremely overrated in gambling. Every advanced mathematics degree in the world will not help if you can’t recognize situational spots the oddsmakers use to set the lines.
    interesting methodology
    can you give a real life example

    Leave a comment:


  • Cuse0323
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt17
    I have fun when I win bud.
    Not as much as I do losing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt17
    replied
    Originally posted by SharpAngles
    Math is extremely overrated in gambling. Every advanced mathematics degree in the world will not help if you can’t recognize situational spots the oddsmakers use to set the lines.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt17
    replied
    Originally posted by Carborundum
    there are three basic types of sports gamblers:

    1) people who bet numbers. they sit around comparing lines at different sports books and bet on lines they think have the most value in comparison to other sports book lines. this requires basic level math skills and some higher level math when you start determining value on parlays, teasers, etc. these types of gamblers are usually math nerds. this is the easiest way to win but also the most boring.

    2) people that make their own numbers through a computer model. this requires higher level math skills along with programming skills. these are the most likely to bet professionally.

    3) people that bet based on their overall knowledge of a sport. these people are generally win because they are clever so math is not particularly important. this is the hardest way to win but the most realistic for the average person.
    Two

    Leave a comment:


  • SharpAngles
    replied
    Math is extremely overrated in gambling. Every advanced mathematics degree in the world will not help if you can’t recognize situational spots the oddsmakers use to set the lines.

    Leave a comment:


  • CappinTerp
    replied
    There is only one thing,one needs to know....​PRICE,PRICE and Price.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carborundum
    replied
    there are three basic types of sports gamblers:

    1) people who bet numbers. they sit around comparing lines at different sports books and bet on lines they think have the most value in comparison to other sports book lines. this requires basic level math skills and some higher level math when you start determining value on parlays, teasers, etc. these types of gamblers are usually math nerds. this is the easiest way to win but also the most boring.

    2) people that make their own numbers through a computer model. this requires higher level math skills along with programming skills. these are the most likely to bet professionally.

    3) people that bet based on their overall knowledge of a sport. these people are generally win because they are clever so math is not particularly important. this is the hardest way to win but the most realistic for the average person.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darkside Magick
    replied
    Originally posted by wolly
    That theorem looks like probability. What happened to limits,functions,differentiation,integra ls,etc? Don't you use them?
    It is conditional probability...major math bettors use to win... Some take it a step further and use (QBism) Quantum bayesianism

    Leave a comment:


  • wolly
    replied
    Originally posted by Darkside Magick
    If you not using bayes theorem.. You not going to win long term PERIOD
    That theorem looks like probability. What happened to limits,functions,differentiation,integra ls,etc? Don't you use them?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chi_archie
    replied
    need an Abacus for sure

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt17
    replied
    Originally posted by Cuse0323
    Math nerds are the guys who win, but don’t have as much fun. But they have the money so they are victorious over degenerates like me.
    I have fun when I win bud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darkside Magick
    replied
    If you not using bayes theorem.. You not going to win long term PERIOD

    Leave a comment:


  • Cuse0323
    replied
    Math nerds are the guys who win, but don’t have as much fun. But they have the money so they are victorious over degenerates like me.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    advanced math

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt17
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    its 100% math
    This.

    Leave a comment:


  • bettingman6
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    its 100% math

    best cappers no nothing about players, teams and injuries, STATS IN GENERAL

    only losers look at that stuff

    You can't ignore injuries in betting. That's a really stupid idea.


    What you can do is try to figure out if the injured player was overrated or underrated. If he was overrated, then it might be a good idea to bet for his team, because the line was probably adjusted too much for his injury. (In fact, if he was a bad player his injury might actually help the team.) If he was underrated, then it might be good idea to bet against his team, because the line probably wasn't adjusted enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlickFazzer
    replied
    trust your models and instincts.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolly
    replied
    Originally posted by jjgold
    its 100% math
    best cappers no nothing about players, teams and injuries, STATS IN GENERAL
    only losers look at that stuff
    Well,what math? Gymnasium math,Highschool math,College math?

    Leave a comment:


  • jjgold
    replied
    its 100% math

    best cappers no nothing about players, teams and injuries, STATS IN GENERAL

    only losers look at that stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • wolly
    started a topic Math in gambling

    Math in gambling

    How much math do you need to apply in gambling(poker,sports betttings,etc)? I only learned about permutations and combinations and I have no idea if you use calculus(including integrals,limits and differentiation). I once read a book about some formulas but I could never understand their significance.(there were some weird limits and unfortunately nothing made a lot of sense to me)
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...