what a fck job

[Shafted69]

Mama always told me to catch the ball with 2 hands and secure to the body when all you need is a 1st down.

[MoMoneyMoVaughn]

[beerman2619]

Who cares, right or wrong, they deserved it after last week. Karma.

Lmfao coming from a eagles fan.

[dondude]

What's the talk about karma from last week. The nfl publicly admitted to missing 7 calls against the lions

[TDKJET1717]

would have loved to see someone lose it, and hit a ref.

[manny24]

whore shit

it was a fukkin catch

[deadphish]

Haha! You lose!!!!!!!!

[Petey Wheatstraw]

The better lost as it turns out.

[yankees10]

the sad f'n thing is THE BALL NEVER HIT THE FCK'N GROUND!!!!!!!!!

AND IN ANY EVENT HE WAS EXTENDING TO PUT THE BALL INTO THE ENDZONE........

Saw it the way I did ball bounced off his wrist never hitting the ground but is what it is they over achieved and are headed in the right direction can't wait til next year

[nVinyl]

moment call was overturned

hahahaha the little girl agrees with the ref.

[yankees10]

What I see is almost every "expert" and person with nfl experience is saying no catch while fans are saying catch

I guess the field judge who ruled it a catch is a fan lol

[SharkAA]

Should have gotten Discount Double Check on that call. Rodgers has it

But seriously, that was a correct call. Let it go.

[floridagolfer]

Haven't we all seen dozens of these same kind of calls over the past few years? Absolutely. I don't like the rule, but by the letter of the law, the right call was made.

[Renegades]

This rule needs to go

[mcdonae101]

I guess the field judge who ruled it a catch is a fan lol

After watching the replay, most of the people saying it was a catch are cowboy fans. While every "expert" so far has said incomplete pass

[slacker00]

moment call was overturned

Crispy Creme looks like they just announced they ran out of bear claws.

[d2bets]

After watching the replay, most of the people saying it was a catch are cowboy fans. While every "expert" so far has said incomplete pass

I'm not a Cowboys fan. I am a rules expert. His going down was not part of the act of catching the pass. He caught it clean then took steps 1, step 2, step 3, then stretch out. They got it wrong.

[manny24]

pack of queers in here saying no catch probably think Tony Stewart is a cool guy too

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

The fukking refs were wearing fudge packers jerseys all game long.

I will be cheering for Seattle and the for New England.

The fukking refs sucked in this game.

[slacker00]

I'm not a Cowboys fan. I am a rules expert. His going down was not part of the act of catching the pass. He caught it clean then took steps 1, step 2, step 3, then stretch out. They got it wrong.

I was on the fence yesterday. I agreed with the original call on the field, then agreed with the overturn explanation of the ball popping out. Now seeing it again, it's clearly CATCH-STEP1-STEP2-STEP3-STRETCH-FUMBLE-RECOVER. At the very least, I hope the NFL admits it botched this one, this clip makes it crystal clear to me:

[ringemup]

FACE has it right..... everyone pretty much agrees he took THREE mother f'n steps........ and he was trying to extend the ball into the end fck'n zone..... dumbass shoulda just kept it close and taken the ball at the one instead of goin for the t.d. .... but he never dreamed those dumbfcks they call refs would say he didn't make a clean catch.......... as i said...... it's a f'n fck job!

Yes that is what I noticed he actually reached for the end zone intentionally when he couldve just cradled the ball with both arms covering the ball from the ground. Unfortunately a spectacular grab turned into a game-breaking moment. However I wanted to see GB play Seattle all along so it dont matter to me.

[slacker00]

Either way, packers would have marched down and kicked a field goal.

Which could have sent the game into overtime. It's not at all clear how the game plays out if this is a catch.

[d2bets]

I was on the fence yesterday. I agreed with the original call on the field, then agreed with the overturn explanation of the ball popping out. Now seeing it again, it's clearly CATCH-STEP1-STEP2-STEP3-STRETCH-FUMBLE-RECOVER. At the very least, I hope the NFL admits it botched this one, this clip makes it crystal clear to me:

That's what I've been trying to say. I wonder what would have happened if he had been a couple inches closer and that the exact same thing happened but the ball had broken the plane of the goal line. Based on the ruling, it could have been the same no catch, I guess.

You can clearly see that he lunged forward with the left arm while the ball was secured. He caught it and THEN took steps and a lunge.

[Richards]

Watch it at full speed. There is no football move.

Who cares the Cowboys covered.

[meader99]

The rule has been in place for several years....It's called the process of completing the catch. In most peoples eyes he caught the ball, under NFL rules, it's incomplete. It's pretty simple. Dez can wait for the refs to say they got it wrong...He'll be waiting a long time.

[slacker00]

Watch it at full speed. There is no football move.

Who cares the Cowboys covered.

The last 1 yard stretch was the football move. Can you see the animated image I posted? It's clear as day.

[Richards]

The last 1 yard stretch was the football move. Can you see the animated image I posted? It's clear as day.

It's deceptive because it's slow motion.

[mcdonae101]

I'm not a Cowboys fan. I am a rules expert. His going down was not part of the act of catching the pass. He caught it clean then took steps 1, step 2, step 3, then stretch out. They got it wrong.

why r all the experts saying it wasn't a catch. Mike Pereira, a guy who is a paid rules expert, said no catch. And almost all analyst have agreed so far

[NrmlCurvSurfr]

It's deceptive because it's slow motion.

Lol

[slacker00]

It's deceptive because it's slow motion.

Your computer must be slow. It's real speed on my side.

[opie1988]

Like I always say....it is what it is.

It was incomplete. Period.

Just like that wasn't pass interference. It is what it is.

[Richards]

Your computer must be slow. It's real speed on my side.

Maybe. This one plays at full speed for me. I don't see a football move, only going to the ground and losing the ball.

[stevenash]

Cant wait to hear that whiney bitch Skip Bayless tomorrow.

I'd rather
a) puncture my ear drums in with a bic pen
b) bludgeon my temples in with a spade shovel

[slacker00]

Maybe. This one plays at full speed for me. I don't see a football move, only going to the ground and losing the ball.

Right, that angle you can't see the ball stretch out, his body is blocking the view. There's other angles.

[Double Bogey]

Either guys forget, or it's just because this was a more important play, but this has been consistently called incomplete since they put the stupid rule in place. The sad part is people were pissed on the calvin johnson one and nothing changed. If you compare the calvin johnson one to this, it is quite similar. You could argue calvin johnson putting the ball on the ground with clear control is a football move.

People forget why they have this rule. it's to give the official something to base those plays where a guy comes down with the ball and it's immediately punched out. Those before were highly subjective. Unfortunately they probably won't amend the rule because they don't want turnover city.

This rule comes up all the time, most of the time it's passes over the middle. looks like a sure catch and fumble, but by the rule, it's incomplete. That's the way the nfl wants it.