Suns +170 tonight

[ryanXL977]

Keep taking the lakers on the road when they are 3 point dogs and see how burried you are after a year.

patty, u there?

[Casi]

Suns season is over, Cavs -3.5

[ryanXL977]

casi is right

[frostno98]

who do you think i bet those games with frostno? ask tsop who he took today. ask him who took spurs vs celts, lakers vs celts. and yes, gulp, cavs vs celts

if youd stop being a homer and listen to me about the nuggs, i could make you a grip of cash

I seldomly bet the Nugget because I'm too bias. I usually only play the over/under in the nuggets game. So who's taking the Suns. Cav's looks too easy here.

[ClockCleaner]

they beat the clippers

They were getting there ass handed to them when I fell asleep. Thanks for the info.

[ryanXL977]

I seldomly bet the Nugget because I'm too bias. I usually only play the over/under in the nuggets game. So who's taking the Suns. Cav's looks too easy here.

im telling you the suns are done, theyre 5 games back of a team who whipped their asses, at home
they are done, nothing to play for, they play no d

i like cavs her ml

gl

[frostno98]

im telling you the suns are done, theyre 5 games back of a team who whipped their asses, at home
they are done, nothing to play for, they play no d

i like cavs her ml

gl

Then the 220 over should be easy here. Still deciding but probably going with the over.

[ryanXL977]

i would agree with that but im not good at totals

[ryanXL977]

thats 2 i gave you today patty

UW -210
LAL+135

cavs will win also
book it

[pat venditto]

You wouldn't be bragging about your wins if you were a winning gambler long term.

[ryanXL977]

thats correct

but im not bragging
im telling you to make smart bets

[daggerkobe]

[pat venditto]

Was expected to win 40% of the time kobe, not 100%.

[playazzz2g]

suns lost no surprise

[ryanXL977]

i said it before and ill say it again, lakerS+130 is a much better play than suns

best team in nba+money or, lottery team vs second best team , at plus money

[pat venditto]

1 Game. Be more correct than me after 1000 games than I will tip my hat.

[ryanXL977]

i already am dude, i would never take suns in that spot, i would take hawks, new orleans, other good teams, but suns arent a good team. we will agree to disagree.

good luck tmrw
i hope you win

[pat venditto]

So you wouldn't have taken the suns +350? That would have been profitable at a 25% win rate. You are not advantage gambling you are just trying to pick winners are pick price. Thats the same as playing roulette.

[ryanXL977]

you didnt take suns+350 dude
yes i will take any home team at +350 in nba or mlb, anyday

[Mac4Lyfe]

and i will do the cavs ml.
i think the lakers win about 50% of games at sa
and its +150 and i love it
its a much much smarter play bc lakers dont care where they play
suns are a garbage team

Post of the day... I took Lakers 1st half and Cav's minus the points.

Ryan knows his chit. Fade him at your peril.

[ryanXL977]

pat, you also said somehting incorrect. fine, your suns play isnt the worst

but you said if i keep taking lakers as a road dog, ill lose all my cash, you said that
and thats wrong. so why would you say that?

[pat venditto]

Again after 1000 lakers plays as road dogs on the moneyline than speak to me. Small sample size.

[ryanXL977]

youre wrong there dude. this team wont play 1000 on the road, so you better get the team with the best or 2nd best record every year, at plus money, vs teams they are better than

they dont care where they play

[pat venditto]

You realize the books are giving you +130 with the best team in the game for a reason right? Use philosophy and you'll realize you're incorrect and this is just short term varience.

[daggerkobe]

[ryanXL977]

You realize the books are giving you +130 with the best team in the game for a reason right? Use philosophy and you'll realize you're incorrect and this is just short term varience.

you think you can win betting by trying to figure out books? seriouosly? the books job is to make sure equal amounts are on both sides. if you think they are trying to trick you, think again. you should stop betting if you think this shit dude. reverse line movement, all that shit

its bullshit
i can give you 50 examples a day when it fails

[so im zach]

you think you can win betting by trying to figure out books? seriouosly? the books job is to make sure equal amounts are on both sides. if you think they are trying to trick you, think again. you should stop betting if you think this shit dude. reverse line movement, all that shit

its bullshit
i can give you 50 examples a day when it fails

This is false.

[pat venditto]

Like i said document 1000 plays (including your losses than i'll tip my hat if your profitting)

[ryanXL977]

i post every play i do in best bets of the day
i also post them all in threads, i cant get the spreadsheet to work

you can use my best bets if you want to make money

[pat venditto]

Ryan you don't document all your picks.

[ryanXL977]

i dont know how to the spreadsheet, wont work on my mac
you can troll me and follow my plays, theyre better than many others. better than yours i thnk.

anyhow, gl tmrw

[andywend]

Pat, this will probably be the only time I ever agree with RyanXL as I can't stand the guy.

All of this talk about "trap lines" is ludicrous.

Ryan's statement about lines being set in hopes of attracting equal money on both sides is absolutely accurate.

I'm not saying this goal is accomplished because most of the time, the majority of money does wind up on one side over the other. However, the last thing the books want is for oddsmakers to show any bias in their lines as sharps will jump all over any discrepancies and they bet far more than "squares".

[Immortality]

i dont know how to the spreadsheet, wont work on my mac
you can troll me and follow my plays, theyre better than many others. better than yours i thnk.

anyhow, gl tmrw

Firefox works on a Mac so I would think the spreadsheet would work just fine with that.