Tigers series price is only +102

TonyTall · 10-10-13, 10:56 PM

cabrera swinging with 1hand

Goat Milk · 10-10-13, 10:56 PM

Boston worst record in the league last year, weren't they? now they're gonna go to the world series?

na. boston pitchers will get smoked. peavy is their ace. nuff said. tigers lineup is straight stacked this year. hunter and jackson haven't been getting on base too much to let cabrera do anything. that'll change against boston. too much power in the meat of our lineup if those two get on base to start.

lakerboy · 10-10-13, 10:58 PM

Lol goat. Bos will smash det. Detroits bullpen sucks. Bos can hit. Oak couldn't.

Smoke · 10-10-13, 10:59 PM

Its a gift

ThaTopMoron · 10-10-13, 11:05 PM

Boston Dodgers oh yeah baby we like it like that

Goat Milk · 10-10-13, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Lol goat. Bos will smash det. Detroits bullpen sucks. Bos can hit. Oak couldn't.

True. But det starters go 7 innings minimum. Sanchez had the lowest era in the al and he's their third pitcher. i think they all will go a min of 7 innings so bullpen will only be a factor in 1 or 2 games max. it won't decide more than 1 game for bost imo. bost pitching blows. it will be a good series. tigers are much better than last year where they made it to the world series so that's why i like them.

good luck and goodnight

BigDofBA · 10-10-13, 11:13 PM

Boston has been the better team all year.

Really, so far in the playoffs the best team has won each round. If it stays true, it will be a Sox/Dodgers World Series and MLB would love it.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:15 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Boston worst record in the league last year, weren't they? now they're gonna go to the world series?

na. boston pitchers will get smoked. peavy is their ace. nuff said. tigers lineup is straight stacked this year. hunter and jackson haven't been getting on base too much to let cabrera do anything. that'll change against boston. too much power in the meat of our lineup if those two get on base to start.

You are legally retarded. I'm sure of it.

t-wizzle · 10-10-13, 11:15 PM

I can't believe that line. I thought Boston -150 for sure.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:16 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

True. But det starters go 7 innings minimum. Sanchez had the lowest era in the al and he's their third pitcher. i think they all will go a min of 7 innings so bullpen will only be a factor in 1 or 2 games max. it won't decide more than 1 game for bost imo. bost pitching blows. it will be a good series. tigers are much better than last year where they made it to the world series so that's why i like them.

good luck and goodnight

You know nothing about baseball. It's painfully obvious in this post.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:16 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

I can't believe that line. I thought Boston -150 for sure.

What? -150?

BigDofBA · 10-10-13, 11:16 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You are legally retarded. I'm sure of it.

You really take this guy seriously? Or should I say poster.

You've been here long enough to figure out there are "probably" several accounts that are complete shams and it may even be one guy signing in under like three different names.

It's entertaining and it lets you know what sides you don't want to be on.

easyliving · 10-10-13, 11:18 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Boston worst record in the league last year, weren't they? now they're gonna go to the world series?

na. boston pitchers will get smoked. peavy is their ace. nuff said. tigers lineup is straight stacked this year. hunter and jackson haven't been getting on base too much to let cabrera do anything. that'll change against boston. too much power in the meat of our lineup if those two get on base to start.

was about to say the same thing. Simply put Boston doesn't have enough pitching. I think this series ends fairly early and I think Detroit wins it in 5.

t-wizzle · 10-10-13, 11:20 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

What? -150?

Yea what'd you expect. -150 isn't that much. Boston with homefield. They were the better team.

Smoke · 10-10-13, 11:20 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You are legally retarded. I'm sure of it.

BigDofBA · 10-10-13, 11:22 PM

Originally posted by easyliving

was about to say the same thing. Simply put Boston doesn't have enough pitching. I think this series ends fairly early and I think Detroit wins it in 5.

Detroit in 5??????

That will not happen.

crustyme · 10-10-13, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Lol goat. Bos will smash det. Detroits bullpen sucks. Bos can hit. Oak couldn't.

you've been so good so far.

tampa - loser
pirates - loser
a's - loser
indians - loser
angels - loser

lol

keep your horrible picks coming, airboy.

can't wait for your 50x or is it 100x this weekend.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Yea what'd you expect. -150 isn't that much. Boston with homefield. They were the better team.

-130.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:24 PM

"Peavy is their ace."

I've heard it all now.

t-wizzle · 10-10-13, 11:24 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

-130.

Then why so appalled at a 20 cent difference?

ThaTopMoron · 10-10-13, 11:25 PM

Tigers only got to the WS last year because the Yanks were DONE and got swept

Deuce · 10-10-13, 11:26 PM

Lakerboy is interesting. I think I have him figured out mostly. He throws out picks that are off the wall that he knows won't likely hit for attention. He isn't as stupid as he comes off here though. Smarter than 90% of posters when it comes to gambling.

ThaTopMoron · 10-10-13, 11:27 PM

Originally posted by Deuce

Lakerboy is interesting. I think I have him figured out mostly. He throws out picks that are off the wall that he knows won't likely hit for attention. He isn't as stupid as he comes off here though. Smarter than 90% of posters when it comes to gambling.

and bets on both sides of the NBA Finals and switches bets 34 times

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:31 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Then why so appalled at a 20 cent difference?

20 cents is a pretty big difference in a series line.

And how exactly was I "appalled"?

crustyme · 10-10-13, 11:32 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Yea what'd you expect. -150 isn't that much. Boston with homefield. They were the better team.

this is the alcs dumbass.

plus detroit won the season series.

t-wizzle · 10-10-13, 11:33 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

20 cents is a pretty big difference in a series line.

And how exactly was I "appalled"?

By your response. It was practically a scoff. As if to say how could you possibly think it would be -150.

wagerjunkie · 10-10-13, 11:35 PM

just take the OVER in every game. going to be a slug fest.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:38 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

By your response. It was practically a scoff. As if to say how could you possibly think it would be -150.

Well given that's off by 37 cents vs. what the books have, I'm not exactly sure why you're surprised.

You really think Boston would be -150 in the ALCS against a team that beat them in the regular season series and only finished four games behind them in the overall AL standings?

t-wizzle · 10-10-13, 11:43 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Well given that's off by 37 cents vs. what the books have, I'm not exactly sure why you're surprised.

You really think Boston would be -150 in the ALCS against a team that beat them in the regular season series and only finished four games behind them in the overall AL standings?

I figured home field + better record + redsox inflated line would equal -150. That's not an overwhelming fave considering the homefield advantage. Again, it was only 20 cents off what you claimed to think it was going to be so I don't see the big deal.

No coincidences · 10-10-13, 11:46 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

I figured home field + better record + redsox inflated line would equal -150. That's not an overwhelming fave considering the homefield advantage. Again, it was only 20 cents off what you claimed to think it was going to be so I don't see the big deal.

I guess we'll just agree to disagree (again).

20 cents is a pretty big difference in a series price if you ask me -- as is 35-40, which is the actual difference compared to the real line -- but whatever.

goduke · 10-11-13, 12:03 AM

its a dodgers red sox world series. Not sure why books keep giving away sox free series money but easier to just take it

No coincidences · 10-11-13, 12:04 AM

Brock at EOG:

"Boston waltzes into the WS"

goduke · 10-11-13, 12:07 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Brock at EOG:

"Boston waltzes into the WS"

Sad but true unfortunately. This is MLB's wet dream to have them and the dodgers match up. Itll happen no matter what they have to do

Rich Boy · 10-11-13, 12:24 AM

If Verlander continues to pitch like he has lately, Detroit will take this series prob in 6 games

Boston starting pitchers are very soft and I think they will get leaned on pretty heavy. Lester might be able to shut down a team, but Peavy and Lackey are scrubs who will get hit up, HARD.

Detroit can pitch a 3 man rotation of Verlander, Scherzer and Sanchez and that will be enough to win this series.