Parlay Celtics ML and Cavs ML = Even money pay-out

kipper32 · 02-08-09, 12:51 AM

sure, i'll go with ya

onlooker · 02-08-09, 12:52 AM

It should be money. Good luck.

pat venditto · 02-08-09, 12:56 AM

Stop.

fearless · 02-08-09, 12:57 AM

Originally posted by pat venditto

Stop.

What does that mean?

anthonydiamondLC · 02-08-09, 12:59 AM

lakers dominated in L.A. last time they played.

fearless · 02-08-09, 01:07 AM

Originally posted by anthonydiamondLC

lakers dominated in L.A. last time they played.

The Cavs were only down 7 with 3:31 left and they were playing without Ilgauskas. The Lakers also had Bynum in that game. You add in the fact that the Cavs are 23-0 at home and how can you not like the Cavs?

onlooker · 02-08-09, 01:13 AM

Originally posted by anthonydiamondLC

lakers dominated in L.A. last time they played.

I think they only took control in that game late in the 4th.

fearless · 02-08-09, 01:19 AM

Originally posted by onlòóker

I think they only took control in that game late in the 4th.

The Lakers were pounding it inside to Gasol and Bynum and the two of them shot a combined 17-23 from the field.

You take out Bynum for the Lakers and you put in Ilgauskas for Cleveland and EVERYTHING changes. The Lakers can't pound into Gasol against Ilgauskas, that's a joke and there's no Bynum.

You can throw out the first game, it's irrevelant due to the injury situations of the teams.

onlooker · 02-08-09, 01:20 AM

Originally posted by fearless

The Lakers were pounding it inside to Gasol and Bynum and the two of them shot a combined 17-23 from the field.

You take out Bynum for the Lakers and you put in Ilgauskas for Cleveland and EVERYTHING changes. The Lakers can't pound into Gasol against Ilgauskas, that's a joke and there's no Bynum.

You can throw out the first game, it's irrevelant due to the injury situations of the teams.

I know it, what I was trying to say was. The Lakers didn't dominate the Cavaliers in that last game.

fearless · 02-08-09, 01:21 AM

Originally posted by onlòóker

I know it, what I was trying to say was. The Lakers didn't dominate the Cavaliers in that last game.

I know you realize that, I was actually talking to the other guy.

THEGREAT30 · 02-08-09, 01:45 AM

The Celtics spread is about even also. The Celts dominate on Sundays. They score more than any other day of the week. The Celts over may be undervalued also. Take Celts moneyline and the over for a good start.

fearless · 02-08-09, 01:50 AM

Originally posted by THEGREAT30

The Celtics spread is about even also. The Celts dominate on Sundays. They score more than any other day of the week. The Celts over may be undervalued also. Take Celts moneyline and the over for a good start.

I'm saying parlay Celtics ML and Cavs ML. This is pending line movement on the Celtics. I love the Cavs though.

pat venditto · 02-08-09, 01:54 AM

Thegreat knows nothing.

THEGREAT30 · 02-08-09, 01:58 AM

Originally posted by fearless

I'm saying parlay Celtics ML and Cavs ML. This is pending line movement on the Celtics. I love the Cavs though.

I understand, but I dont like the CAVS tommorrow. Where is the CAVS offensive advantage tommorrow other than Lebron James?

Starters:

KOBE VS WALLY
FISH VS WILLIAMS
WALTON VS LEBRON
ODOM VS WALLACE
GASOL VS BIG Z

ONE clear advantage, Lebron. Where as Kobe, Odom, and Gasol should all have big time advantages. I dont like the CAVS here.

Slim · 02-08-09, 01:59 AM

You should also parlay the Barcelona ML -700 in soccer. Barcelona/Celtics/Cavs 3 teamer.

THEGREAT30 · 02-08-09, 01:59 AM

Originally posted by pat venditto

Thegreat knows nothing.

Everyone knows something.

fearless · 02-08-09, 02:03 AM

Originally posted by THEGREAT30

I understand, but I dont like the CAVS tommorrow. Where is the CAVS offensive advantage tommorrow other than Lebron James?

Starters:

KOBE VS WALLY
FISH VS WILLIAMS
WALTON VS LEBRON
ODOM VS WALLACE
GASOL VS BIG Z

ONE clear advantage, Lebron. Where as Kobe, Odom, and Gasol should all have big time advantages. I dont like the CAVS here.

You're talking about a team that's 23-0 at home and you're trying to analyze it like it's on a neutral court? Let me repeat from above:
The Lakers were pounding it inside to Gasol and Bynum and the two of them shot a combined 17-23 from the field.

You take out Bynum for the Lakers and you put in Ilgauskas for Cleveland and EVERYTHING changes. The Lakers can't pound into Gasol against Ilgauskas, that's a joke and there's no Bynum.

You can throw out the first game, it's irrevelant due to the injury situations of the teams.

THEGREAT30 · 02-08-09, 02:12 AM

Originally posted by fearless

You're talking about a team that's 23-0 at home and you're trying to analyze it like it's on a neutral court? Let me repeat from above:
The Lakers were pounding it inside to Gasol and Bynum and the two of them shot a combined 17-23 from the field.

You take out Bynum for the Lakers and you put in Ilgauskas for Cleveland and EVERYTHING changes. The Lakers can't pound into Gasol against Ilgauskas, that's a joke and there's no Bynum.

You can throw out the first game, it's irrevelant due to the injury situations of the teams.

Im on the Lakers moneyline and spread. Bynum wasn't mentioned above.

fearless · 02-08-09, 02:18 AM

Originally posted by THEGREAT30

Im on the Lakers moneyline and spread. Bynum wasn't mentioned above.

We can agree to disagree. Thanks for posting.

fearless · 02-08-09, 05:05 AM

Can we get to back to gambling?

I think this is a great play!

Shortstop · 02-08-09, 06:21 AM

Originally posted by THEGREAT30

The Celtics spread is about even also. The Celts dominate on Sundays. They score more than any other day of the week. The Celts over may be undervalued also. Take Celts moneyline and the over for a good start.

They didn't cover at home last Sunday against Minnesota.

Perhaps you were out.

fearless · 02-08-09, 06:23 AM

Originally posted by Shortstop

They didn't cover at home last Sunday against Minnesota.

Perhaps you were out.

Without Garnett they're a different team. I just want a win anyway.

Robust · 02-08-09, 06:24 AM

just done capping. Cle loses by around 15 points.

Take the Lakers ML for a bigger payday.

Robust

Shortstop · 02-08-09, 06:28 AM

Fearless, I thought you had me on ignore?

fearless · 02-08-09, 06:31 AM

Originally posted by Robust

just done capping. Cle loses by around 15 points.

Take the Lakers ML for a bigger payday.

Robust

fearless · 02-08-09, 06:31 AM

Originally posted by Shortstop

Fearless, I thought you had me on ignore?

I unignored you because I'm desperate for company in this thread.

Robust · 02-08-09, 06:37 AM

okay.. But I have been on a roll.. maybe it is time for me to lose badly?

good luck bro!

Robust

Shortstop · 02-08-09, 06:39 AM

Originally posted by fearless

I unignored you because I'm desperate for company in this thread.

fearless · 02-08-09, 06:43 AM

Originally posted by Robust

okay.. But I have been on a roll.. maybe it is time for me to lose badly?

good luck bro!

Robust

I'm not saying it's impossible for the Lakers to win.

But, you're predicting the Lakers will beat a team that's 23-0 at home by 15 points. It's conceivable but hard to imagine.

If you're really confident you might consider the alternate line which will probably be Lakers -3.5 +300 or something like that. Go for the biggest payday possible if you're really confident.

Robust · 02-08-09, 06:46 AM

Originally posted by fearless

I'm not saying it's impossible for the Lakers to win.

But, you're predicting the Lakers will beat a team that's 23-0 at home by 15 points. It's conceivable but hard to imagine.

If you're really confident you might consider the alternate line which will probably be Lakers -3.5 +200 or something like that. Go for the biggest payday possible if you're really confident.

I am that confident, but my book is shitty.. no alt lines.. and most every play is rated at -110.. stuck there til i cash out and I won't do that 'til I get to at least $1,000.

Robust

fearless · 02-08-09, 06:53 AM

Originally posted by Robust

I am that confident, but my book is shitty.. no alt lines.. and most every play is rated at -110.. stuck there til i cash out and I won't do that 'til I get to at least $1,000.

Robust

I want to know why you think this is the game that the Cavs finally lose at home? I've found that the one of the hardest things to do in sports is to predict exactly when a long winning streak or losing streak will end.

Tell us please, why this particular game?

Robust · 02-08-09, 07:02 AM

don't really know what exactly you want, but I got it capped at 115+ to 100+.. I was on the cavs before, but now the numbers say take the lakers. I put no gut/faith/streak into consideration.. just the numbers.. and the over 206 is a VERY strong play here..

gonna go to bed bro.. will be back in 8 hrs.

good luck!

Robust

fearless · 02-08-09, 07:09 AM

Originally posted by Robust

don't really know what exactly you want, but I got it capped at 115+ to 100+.. I was on the cavs before, but now the numbers say take the lakers. I put no gut/faith/streak into consideration.. just the numbers.. and the over 206 is a VERY strong play here..

gonna go to bed bro.. will be back in 8 hrs.

good luck!

Robust

Thanks for sharing your insight.

fearless · 02-08-09, 07:20 AM

I might pass on Boston. Boston -7 is a weird line. The books are telling us that they consider the Spurs to be equal to the Lakers (the Lakers were also 7 point dogs at Boston in the last game). Are the Spurs equal to the Lakers? I think not. Boston should be a stronger favorite v. the Spurs than they were against the Lakers. I don't like that at all.