Everytime I hear Bron fanboys talk about comparisons to Jordan, and use James "all-around" stats as proof, I always wonder how they rectify the fact that he doesn't have better "all-around" stats than The Big O.
So, using a very simple if-then logic.
If Jordan > Oscar
And Oscar > LeBron
Then LeBron cannot be > Jordan.
Unless of course, LeBron fans are willing to call Oscar better than Mike, but that still makes Bron Bron fall short of The GOAT label.
In Summary, LeBron NEEDS to win 7 rings to be legit contender for The GOAT. As the stats alone argument that many of those knuckle draggers hold onto for dear life, simply doesn't work.
So, using a very simple if-then logic.
If Jordan > Oscar
And Oscar > LeBron
Then LeBron cannot be > Jordan.
Unless of course, LeBron fans are willing to call Oscar better than Mike, but that still makes Bron Bron fall short of The GOAT label.
In Summary, LeBron NEEDS to win 7 rings to be legit contender for The GOAT. As the stats alone argument that many of those knuckle draggers hold onto for dear life, simply doesn't work.

