The Ravens backers just got screwed!

[purecarnagge]

It just has to touch the ****ing white line... or the pylon... you guys are ****ing sore losers...MAN THE **** UP

[ipickwinners]

yup

[dwaechte]

Look, when the majority of the non gambling community is saying it was a bs call, you need to atleast consider the possibility that it was a bad call.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/12/14/ravens-get-screwed

[ipickwinners]

no, ball was in the endzone, i dont care, i saw enough of what i need to see

[yisman]

I did get screwed on that. It wasn't a TD. Should've been 4th down

[bigboydan]

The refs appear to have some type of grudge against the Steelers when it comes to the Vegas line. First it was the SD game and now this one.

[ipickwinners]

I did get screwed on that. It wasn't a TD. Should've been 4th down

so when the ball crosses the goal line and the receiver has possesion its not a TD? this is a new rule to me

[Chi_archie]

anyone got a vid link for this???

[laxdjock]

Look, when the majority of the non gambling community is saying it was a bs call, you need to atleast consider the possibility that it was a bad call.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/...ns-get-screwed

Exactly.

It will be curious to see if the league comments on this...or if there are talks at the off season meetings, because that was a blown call.

[dwaechte]

From the AP game story:

"The play was reviewed because it appeared Holmes' feet were in the end zone but the ball may have been in front of the goal line. The official explanation for a TD was that Holmes had both feet in the end zone with possession of the ball.

Page 776 of the rules digest in the NFL fact book reads: "A player with the ball in his possession scores a touchdown when the ball is on, above or over the goal line.""



Even AP thinks the refs ****ed up.

[ipickwinners]

ball was over the goal line, it doesnt matter, esy TD

[irishdude]

yes the ball cross on the pass its not the same it was ablown call period

[nick2060]

It wasnt a touchdown but:
1. Im up eitherway and i gamble to make money so who cares
2. Pittsburgh was going to tie it up at least, and take it into overtime so who knows. Baltimores offense didnt do anything in the 2nd half unless they got a short field

[ipickwinners]

It wasnt a touchdown but:
1. Im up eitherway and i gamble to make money so who cares
2. Pittsburgh was going to tie it up at least, and take it into overtime so who knows. Baltimores offense didnt do anything in the 2nd half unless they got a short field

so when a WR has possesion of the ball and the ball crosses the goal line its not a TD? this is a new rule i guess