NFL as consistent as ever

[Smutbucket]

what the fukk are you talking about, challenging "face value" , your "face value" is your opponent you fukking moron, wake the penetrate up

and my proof is how terrible you are at capping, and remeber earlier how you were talking about "all my friends talking about taking texans because how popular it is on sites...." Im sure the bookies dont realize this, Im sure they wouldnt use this information to their advantage either, I mean why would they? so you have not only presented nothing to validate your own opinion, (youve made it real clear that these are all opinions) youve actually reinforced mine, so I guess this discussion wasnt pointless....

hopefully anyone else whos reading this can see what this discussion is really about,

the more I see you type the more I believe you work for a bookie, you couldnt possibly be this naive, and even when ******* out flaws in your logic, you response is "well thats your opinion and the burden of proof is on you!"

feel free to point out flaws in my logic besides, "it sounds right" "wait, so you think 90% werent on colts/pats/ blah blah blah....."

[Pete0]

Saloon this chet.

4 pages of worthless info.

[testertips]

Saloon this chet.

4 pages of worthless info.

this

[No coincidences]

what the fukk are you talking about, challenging "face value" , your "face value" is your opponent you fukking moron, wake the penetrate up

and my proof is how terrible you are at capping, and remeber earlier how you were talking about "all my friends talking about taking texans because how popular it is on sites...." Im sure the bookies dont realize this, Im sure they wouldnt use this information to their advantage either, I mean why would they? so you have not only presented nothing to validate your own opinion, (youve made it real clear that these are all opinions) youve actually reinforced mine, so I guess this discussion wasnt pointless....

hopefully anyone else whos reading this can see what this discussion is really about,

the more I see you type the more I believe you work for a bookie, you couldnt possibly be this naive, and even when ******* out flaws in your logic, you response is "well thats your opinion and the burden of proof is on you!"

feel free to point out flaws in my logic besides, "it sounds right" "wait, so you think 90% werent on colts/pats/ blah blah blah....."

Man, for a drug hound you sure are wound up.

You make it sound like I bet strictly based on this information. If you'd bother to check my picks, you'd realize that is completely not true. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that nearly 90% of my losses in my tracked threads are because I ignored line movement and went against it, or tried to ride the wave of a big public play and crashed and burned.

We're not getting anywhere here. I'm going to say this again: you have your opinion and I have mine. No one's forcing you to respond, and you haven't posted a single fact that backs up your statement about inaccurate and false information. Why you're getting so bent out of shape is beyond me.

There are literally hundreds of posts a day here that are irrelevant to sports betting or completely clueless/mindless "lock" threads and such. Go attack them. I'm done here.

[t-wizzle]

This fukkin thread is still going?

Mods must be asleep. Umm saloon???

[NYSportsGuy210]

It's not my fault the NFL is owning you pal.

"Tilt proof baby."

More lies from a mush. What else is new on SBR