NFL as consistent as ever

[zacharyj53]

I have never once in my life said I was sharp or "a sharp." Ever. I don't believe it either. I have threads for all of my plays. Some years I win. Some years I lose. I'm down more than I'm up in my gambling lifetime, but I'm always learning and trying to get better. That's all I can do.

If you and patty get so bent out of shape, I suggest you put me on ignore and make your world a better place. If not, there's something inside of you that just can't resist....which makes me wonder what's really going on with you two, if you know what I mean.

Bud, I know you aren't some bad person. I just think you post way too much. I don't try to attack you in multiple threads. I do believe I have only come at you in 3 threads over 2 years. If you have 40k+ posts in two years, ie damn near 2k posts a month, you are going to get flak.

[No coincidences]

Bud, I know you aren't some bad person. I just think you post way too much. I don't try to attack you in multiple threads. I do believe I have only come at you in 3 threads over 2 years. If you have 40k+ posts in two years, ie damn near 2k posts a month, you are going to get flak.

Why? What in the hell does that matter? I've been at SBR for nearly three years (34 months). That's what, 35 posts a day on average? I don't even know what it comes out to, but I'm sure you'll figure it out for me.

I work in front of a computer for 50-60 hours a week. It's not hard to accumulate that many posts, especially when I'm in stupid bullshit discussions like this one and I don't really visit any other sites or forums. Trying to figure out why you're so obsessed with the number of posts I have -- do you go into paco's threads, or LB's, or JJ's and do the same thing? Are you with the Internet bandwidth police?

[zacharyj53]

Why? What in the hell does that matter? I've been at SBR for nearly three years (34 months). That's what, 35 posts a day on average? I don't even know what it comes out to, but I'm sure you'll figure it out for me.

I work in front of a computer for 50-60 hours a week. It's not hard to accumulate that many posts, especially when I'm in stupid bullshit discussions like this one and I don't really visit any other sites or forums. Trying to figure out why you're so obsessed with the number of posts I have -- do you go into paco's threads, or LB's, or JJ's and do the same thing? Are you with the Internet bandwidth police?

So obsessed? LOL, bro I probably haven't said anything to you in like 2 months. I just sometimes get tired of how many threads you start. Obviously I am not the only one. How about you say I am betting 20 bucks on this play, vice trying to come off as being sharp about plays.

[DudleyDawson]

nocoin, remember when you said you were better than Billy Walters, just lacked a little discipline?

[No coincidences]

nocoin, remember when you said you were better than Billy Walters, just lacked a little discipline?

What?

Link?

I love how you post something like this without connecting it to anything.

[No coincidences]

So obsessed? LOL, bro I probably haven't said anything to you in like 2 months. I just sometimes get tired of how many threads you start. Obviously I am not the only one. How about you say I am betting 20 bucks on this play, vice trying to come off as being sharp about plays.

Would that make you sleep better at night?

Now you're telling me what I should post? LOL. Dude, IGNORE ME.

Damn, some of you cats are nuts.

[No coincidences]

"Better than Billy Waters"

Classic.

Only at SBR.

Hey DD, remember when you said you liked to dry hump your dog when he was sleeping?

[zacharyj53]

Would that make you sleep better at night?

Now you're telling me what I should post? LOL. Dude, IGNORE ME.

Damn, some of you cats are nuts.

No, what I am saying is you should let people know what you are betting vice trying to act sharp with 20 buck bets.

We are nuts, says the guy who has 40k post in 2 years. LMAO, you are f'n sad.

[No coincidences]

No, what I am saying is you should let people know what you are betting vice trying to act sharp with 20 buck bets.

We are nuts, says the guy who has 40k post in 2 years. LMAO, you are f'n sad.

I've said multiple times here that my bets are $20 per unit. I've never claimed to be "sharp," nor have I ever claimed to have big money on games. All of my plays are tracked in threads at SBR, every sport, to follow, fade or disregard.

You act like I'm being cryptic or disingenuous. I'm more up-front and honest than 99% of the posters here. I've had multiple threads that ended up 20-30 units. I've had multiple threads that ended down just as much, if not more. It's all on the site, as is what I bet and the reasons why my bets aren't ever for big money. I have a wife, kids and a real income. This is a hobby for me. Nothing more. I'm not going to shy away from that.

You seem to be confused.

[zacharyj53]

You are beyond cryptic with the threads you start, hence my problem.

[ssmann]

leave no coin alone!

[No coincidences]

You are beyond cryptic with the threads you start, hence my problem.

"My problem"?

Taking things a little too seriously here or what?



This site is filled with air-betting goons who claim to be huge winners betting large sums of cash on games when in reality most are brokedick single fvcks posting from their mom's basement. Go after those guys if you are so concerned with the honesty and integrity of SBR.

[stevex]

Coin

Screw the haters magn. Keep doing what your doing...

[zacharyj53]

LMAO, yea taking it so serious I have commented in like 3 of your 40k threads in 2 years. Just calling you out for being a douche.

[No coincidences]

Coin

Screw the haters magn. Keep doing what your doing...

I don't expect everyone to take my posts seriously, follow everything I say or see, or demand I'm called sharp in any way, shape or form.

If you don't like me, ignore me. If you don't like my plays, fade me. Damn, it's not that complicated. Otherwise you're just wasting your time.

[No coincidences]

LMAO, yea taking it so serious I have commented in like 3 of your 40k threads in 2 years. Just calling you out for being a douche.

OK thanks. Feel better now?

"Honey, what did you do today?" (and by honey, I mean what probably amounts to your right hand)

"I called No Coin out for being a douche on SBR."

[zacharyj53]

40k posts in 2 years, such a loser.

[Vinnie Paz]

Coin

Screw the haters magn. Keep doing what your doing...

*has no problem with NC*
Fukk at least the guy actually talks sports
All he's doing is pointing out nfl public favorites got killed again, per usual.

[No coincidences]

40k posts in 2 years, such a loser.

Is this just making your day better? Posting the same things over and over again?

Here, let me save you the time and energy. I'll do the next one for you:

"You are a douche."

"You are a loser."

Rince, recycle, repeat.

Copy, paste. Copy paste.

[zacharyj53]

Can you honestly defend what I say against you? If you can, then I will not post in your threads once or twice a year.

[No coincidences]

Can you honestly defend what I say against you? If you can, then I will not post in your threads once or twice a year.

I already did.

You just choose not to hear it.

[DudleyDawson]

What?

Link?

I love how you post something like this without connecting it to anything.

You said it a few weeks back...not gonna dig the post up, my god you post hundreds of times per day.

[No coincidences]

You said it a few weeks back...not gonna dig the post up, my god you post hundreds of times per day.

WTF are you talking about?

You are a bald-faced liar.

You made the statement man -- back it up. Find where I said I was "better than Billy Walters." I dare you.

[cblackgold]

lols

thanks for the laugh

[No coincidences]

Here you go DD.

Find it:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/search.php?searchid=4737884

Every post with my name and "Billy Walters" in it. You said it was just a few weeks back -- shouldn't be hard.

[hockey216]

minnesota and chicago and Buffalo and Cleveland were public plays too.

they won. Sharps took hits on all 4 of those games.

[Smutbucket]

we dont care what you think about how much you think was won or lost by certain books......

its all a guess.....we have more important things to worry about, like actually capping the games.....

[No coincidences]

we dont care what you think about how much you think was won or lost by certain books......

OK. Thanks for taking the time to clarify.

[Smutbucket]

just trying to help guide any beginners who read this thread and dont know any better....maybe theyll think your info is accurate or maybe theyll find some other free website/ or even paid website that tracks certain books and try to make money that way....Im trying to help these people more than you because Ive told you this shit over and over and you still dont listen. and you say your trying to get better but you look at all the wrong things.

and I think its hilarious how earlier you said apricot must be into drugs....drugs are all around us your moron. their a part of life. drugs are in plants. but theres a big difference between natural drugs and synthetic drugs. your gov't and pharm industry has effectively blurred the lines for people like you. making you think that all drugs are bad. but they arent. one is damaging to your body/addictive/life consuming the other isnt. one is made from a seed, the others involve isolating/mixing chemicals.......stop perpetuating myths...

[No coincidences]

and I think its hilarious how earlier you said apricot must be into drugs....drugs are all around us your moron. their a part of life. drugs are in plants. but theres a big difference between natural drugs and synthetic drugs. your gov't and pharm industry has effectively blurred the lines for people like you. making you think that all drugs are bad. but they arent. one is damaging to your body/addictive/life consuming the other isnt. one is made from a seed, the others involve isolating/mixing chemicals.......stop perpetuating myths...

Wow.

[Sam Odom]

just trying to help guide any beginners who read this thread and dont know any better....maybe theyll think your info is accurate or maybe theyll find some other free website/ or even paid website that tracks certain books and try to make money that way....Im trying to help these people more than you because Ive told you this shit over and over and you still dont listen. and you say your trying to get better but you look at all the wrong things.

and I think its hilarious how earlier you said apricot must be into drugs....drugs are all around us your moron. their a part of life. drugs are in plants. but theres a big difference between natural drugs and synthetic drugs. your gov't and pharm industry has effectively blurred the lines for people like you. making you think that all drugs are bad. but they arent. one is damaging to your body/addictive/life consuming the other isnt. one is made from a seed, the others involve isolating/mixing chemicals.......stop perpetuating myths...

spot on

[Smutbucket]

[No coincidences]

spot on

Let me ask you this: what do you believe is the purpose of sites posting public betting %? To "help" or "hurt" the player? Do you believe they are inaccurate? In other words, when a site touts the Packers as the top play of the day, how do you think your average Joe reacts to that when he logs into his account? By taking the Colts?

[Smutbucket]

Let me ask you this: what do you believe is the purpose of sites posting public betting %? To "help" or "hurt" the player? Do you believe they are inaccurate? In other words, when a site touts the Packers as the top play of the day, how do you think your average Joe reacts to that when he logs into his account? By taking the Colts?

its made to "hurt" people like you because you stop looking at the actual variables that effect the outcome of the game. anyone who thinks its "helping" them has only been "helped" in the short term and is in for a surprise if they choose to base their picks on it over the long-term.

its made to "help" the bookies make money because it promotes laziness....look this quick new system I found to make some money! just fade the public! or look public is all over this one but lines moving in opposite direction! tail it!

[No coincidences]

its made to "hurt" people like you because you stop looking at the actual variables that effect the outcome of the game. anyone who thinks its "helping" them has only been "helped" in the short term and is in for a surprise if they choose to base their picks on it over the long-term.

its made to "help" the bookies make money because it promotes laziness....look this quick new system I found to make some money! just fade the public! or look public is all over this one but lines moving in opposite direction! tail it!

First of all, I don't make bets just based on what I see as the top public plays on a random website. I'm not sure how this argument has morphed into me acting like these numbers are gospel. I look at them for obvious reasons, but by no means do I bet strictly based on that.

You are looking at it all wrong. As I said earlier, I have quite a few friends who see the Packers as the "No. 1 play" or "95% on Green Bay" and they blindly take that bet. You honestly think more people see those lopsided numbers and fade them?

Anyway, I really don't know how or why it's about this now. If you think these sites are telling you the Packers, Ravens, Bengals, etc. were the top public plays but they actually weren't because these % are fraudulent, I can't change your mind on that. Every one of my buddies today took the Packers either spread, ML or tease. But maybe the public was actually on the Colts and it's a conspiracy. I don't know.

Here's what I'm going to do: I will start a thread posting the "No. 1" play at Sportsbook.ag for the week. We'll see if, after tracking that for a while, the number lands in the black or the red. Deal?