2012-13 NFL picks

[BigDofBA]

So should Oakland be my first NFL bet of the year?

I got drilled in NCAA football over the weekend so I took yesterday off.

[No coincidences]

What can you say. Vintage Bungals. Not sure why Lewis is even a HC in this league anymore -- a proven loser.

[MexicanStallion]

What can you say. Vintage Bungals. Not sure why Lewis is even a HC in this league anymore -- a proven loser.

He doesn't even have a winning record. As long as the Bungals can float around .500, Brown doesn't care.

[No coincidences]

What a meltdown. 27 unanswered by the Ravens.

OAK ML -115 (1.15U to win 1)

[PAULYPOKER]

CIN +7.5 live +100 (1U to win 1)

CIN +13 live +100 (1U to win 1)

WTF game were U watching?

[No coincidences]

WTF game were U watching?

It was 7-0 and 10-0 when I made those bets. Then it was 17-13. Where were you to talk shit when it was a four-point game?

[No coincidences]

You do anything more than troll anymore Pauly?

[2daBank]

Thanks, but I shouldn't have messed with that first half. Stupid. Half bets are for suckers.

love half bets myself....mostly totals, not many sides..

[No coincidences]

Typical NFL -- you do well, push the envelope, then give it all back. Was up 5.7U and then lost every single SNF and MNF play.



7-8, -3.8U thread

Week 2 leans:

CHI +6
CAR +3
SEA +3
StL +3
DET +7

[suicidekings]

Typical NFL -- you do well, push the envelope, then give it all back. Was up 5.7U and then lost every single SNF and MNF play.



7-8, -3.8U thread

Week 2 leans:

CHI +6
CAR +3
SEA +3
StL +3
DET +7

Why all dogs? just coincidence? or do you not believe in value on favourites in the NFL? I agree with STL & DET, but less so with the others.

[No coincidences]

Just what I initial lean SK.

Tonight:

CHI TT under 23 (1.05U to win 1)
GB +1/under 57 tease (1.1U to win 1)

[No coincidences]

GB/CHI under 52 (2.2U to win 2)

[PAULYPOKER]

Love your plays tonight coin

[Dexter]

great night

[No coincidences]

great night

Thanks Dex. Felt good after getting my ass handed to me by the Steelers and Bungals.

3-0, +4U Thursday
10-8, +0.2U season

[No coincidences]

PHI -3 (1.1U to win 1)
PHI -155 (1.55U to win 1)
IND +3 -115 (2.3U to win 2)
JAX +7 (1.1U to win 1)
KC +3 -105 (1.05U to win 1)
TB +8 (1.1U to win 1)

[No coincidences]

SEA +3.5 (2.2U to win 2)

Going to back my Liedowns tonight.

[Vinnie Paz]

Whys everyone like the lions so much??

[No coincidences]

PIT ML live -120 (2.4U to win 2)

[No coincidences]

PHI -3 (1.1U to win 1)
PHI -155 (1.55U to win 1)
IND +3 -115 (2.3U to win 2)
JAX +7 (1.1U to win 1)
KC +3 -105 (1.05U to win 1)
TB +8 (1.1U to win 1)

3-3, +0.75U to start with the 'Hawks pending.

[No coincidences]

SEA ML live -110 (1.1U to win 1)

[D3 Mighty Ducks]

How did u get TB +8? I had the Gmen +7 and I'll gladly take the push in that good/awful performance by Eli.

[No coincidences]

How did u get TB +8? I had the Gmen +7 and I'll gladly take the push in that good/awful performance by Eli.

What do you mean? They were +8 at Bovada, and being juiced at +9 at a bunch of other shops.

[No coincidences]

6-3, +5.95U today
16-11, +6.15U thread

Was going to play Detroit, but I'll just quit while I'm ahead for the day.

[Dexter]

6-3, +5.95U today
16-11, +6.15U thread

Was going to play Detroit, but I'll just quit while I'm ahead for the day.

excellent work.....so now you're saying i should pound det 100x since you wont play it? lol

im gonna watch late money...leaning under

[No coincidences]

excellent work.....so now you're saying i should pound det 100x since you wont play it? lol

im gonna watch late money...leaning under

Probably.

I don't know about this one. Hard to get a read on my Liedowns. Like the under as well, but not enough to play it.

[No coincidences]

Week 3 leans:

DEN +1.5
TEN +4
MIN +7
OAK +4.5
MIA +2.5
BAL -2.5
SD -3

[suicidekings]

Week 3 leans:

DEN +1.5
TEN +4
MIN +7
OAK +4.5
MIA +2.5
BAL -2.5
SD -3

I like Denver and Baltimore a fair bit. The Titans are a tough team to back as I suspect they might end up a 4-12 team this year. The only one of those games I've played so far is the Falcons ML.

Also starting to think that the Bengals get beaten by RG3 and that deep passing attack. The Bengals secondary made Flacco & Weeden look pretty spectacular in the last two weeks. Overall CIN is ranked 30th in pass defense and 32nd in rush defense by Football Outsiders.

[No coincidences]

In order at this point, my favorite plays are:

1) Oakland
2) San Diego
3) Philly
4) Minnesota
5) Denver
6) Tennessee
7) Miami

Not really interested in the Ravens anymore.

[2daBank]

love me some sd...

my guess is my mush will call in pit 2marro, i never lay his action off (why would i the guy is terrible, hasnt hit a gm this yr betting the thu nighter every week and 1 on sunday) so guess really good chance im on oak as this def that "sure thing" winner he loves to bet, he gotta hit one tho so maybe this the week,..

not sure i can play phi, not that i want zona but tough gm...

scared of sf...

no way id play den, i like hou and as long as my mush doesnt call them in as his play (possible even tho not as likely as pit) i will be playing hou, actually already played them -1.5 cause figure i can buy out if need be..

i teased mia with dal.,.

still prob play balt even tho liked them much better if pats wouldnt have lost..

[No coincidences]

love me some sd...

my guess is my mush will call in pit 2marro, i never lay his action off (why would i the guy is terrible, hasnt hit a gm this yr betting the thu nighter every week and 1 on sunday) so guess really good chance im on oak as this def that "sure thing" winner he loves to bet, he gotta hit one tho so maybe this the week,..

not sure i can play phi, not that i want zona but tough gm...

scared of sf...

no way id play den, i like hou and as long as my mush doesnt call them in as his play (possible even tho not as likely as pit) i will be playing hou, actually already played them -1.5 cause figure i can buy out if need be..

i teased mia with dal.,.

still prob play balt even tho liked them much better if pats wouldnt have lost..

If I can get a 3 with Denver, I'll take it. Otherwise, I might just pass.

Hate to say this because I know it's playing with fire, but I don't anticipate dropping much from the above card tomorrow. Might have action on all seven games. Just can't find enough reason to let any of them go, but six or seven plays in the NFL typically doesn't end well.

[2daBank]

If I can get a 3 with Denver, I'll take it. Otherwise, I might just pass.

Hate to say this because I know it's playing with fire, but I don't anticipate dropping much from the above card tomorrow. Might have action on all seven games. Just can't find enough reason to let any of them go, but six or seven plays in the NFL typically doesn't end well.

yea i could see myself buying out of hou if den hits +3 (or if mush boy calls hou in, hoping not), who knows but honestly think this line should have opened there anyway..

in the espn ats contest i play im pretty sure i played same side of all those besides den, i dont see anything wrong with playing 7 gms of coarse i prob play that many on avg, not even counting live betting and halftime bets...

[No coincidences]

Going to lock the Viqueens in now because I can get a 7.5 at Blowdog.

MIN +7.5 (2.2U to win 2)

Think the Niners squeak out a 4-6 point win here.

[No coincidences]

As most of you know, I really like playing the perception angle in a commie league like the NFL.

The Niners are unbeatable at the moment. While they're the best team in football early on, laying more than a TD in a rowdy place like the Metrodome is very suspect.

The Raiders and Titans have their seasons on the line tomorrow at home. They're both buy low investments. Miami as well to a certain extent, even though they're 1-1. I just don't like the makeup or the cadence of the Jets.

Arizona's a sell high. Love their D, but the Eagles are just plain better and I think they'll take care of business accordingly.

[Balco10]

This year you cant bet against the Niners!