rochs preseason money thread

[Walulu]

panthers +3 (bmaker) (3units) panthers under 34 (3units) skins over 33 (3 units) skins +5.5 (4 units) skins TT over 14 (3 units) browns +7.5 (3 units) browns over 38(betonline )(3units) colts +10 (5 dimes) (4 units) jags PK (5 units) dolphins +3.5 (4 units) lions +4 (7 units) Lions +170 (2 units) Bears +3 (10 units) Bears +150 (3 unitS) Denver -4 (3 units) saints -4 (3 units) that should do it

Sorry this is the full list

[bleedtoledo]

Can anyone verify, been too busy to read this thread lately.

Dude is too busy too look back 2 pages. But not so busy that he can't write a question for verification. Wtf

[LolsMcwinsey]

[VicVega91]

Dude is too busy too look back 2 pages. But not so busy that he can't write a question for verification. Wtf

Unfortunately, that kind of laziness is prevelant throughout all forums. Here's a good one; a guy comes on to a forum and asks the score of a game! If he can post on an internet forum that means he can access a ESPN, CBS, etc to check the score himself but he is too frickin lazy

[bleedtoledo]

Pats now -3.5 at my book. I don't see how they don't cover??? I know, I know.. "lions play hard in preseason." But look at the numbers pats have put up. Plus, it is week 3. Doesn't that mean Tom should play like 3 quarters, along with most the starters??

I think I'm gonna go with the square play here..unless someone can talk me out of it.

[freshguy222]

so youre not worried about the rlm on this play and the overall line which is as fishy as it gets?you think books give out free money on a nationally televised football game?why is the line not at -7?

[bobbyk1133]

so youre not worried about the rlm on this play and the overall line which is as fishy as it gets?you think books give out free money on a nationally televised football game?why is the line not at -7?

Can you explain to us what is behind the RLM?

If I see one more post about RLM I'm going to shoot myself No one on this forum has any idea who/what is moving the line or why.

[bleedtoledo]

so youre not worried about the rlm on this play and the overall line which is as fishy as it gets?you think books give out free money on a nationally televised football game?why is the line not at -7?

I'm plenty worried, that's why I'm looking for input

[phillybadboy]

[LT Profits]

Can you explain to us what is behind the RLM?

If I see one more post about RLM I'm going to shoot myself No one on this forum has any idea who/what is moving the line or why.

RLM is almost always sharp money unless there is new information such as guys not playing (I heard nothing new in Pats game) or weather (irrelevant, dome).

Lions are definitely RLM, because 69% of bets are on Pats, but they have gone from -4 to -3 (or -3.5 at + odds)

[LT Profits]

Also RLM doesn't guarantee anything, it just means that the sharps are on that certain team. Sharps do not win 100% of the time. but they ARE right more than they are wrong, so it's always better to be on their side.

[LolsMcwinsey]

[Totolover1409]

Jags are beat. Let's hope the Lions perform

[ebbearsfb1]

Teased the jags ina big bet... they fuckin blow

[bobbyk1133]

RLM is almost always sharp money unless there is new information such as guys not playing (I heard nothing new in Pats game) or weather (irrelevant, dome). Lions are definitely RLM, because 69% of bets are on Pats, but they have gone from -4 to -3 (or -3.5 at + odds)

This is the most basic elementary impression of RLM. The marketplace is much more complicated than this.

[LT Profits]

This is the most basic elementary impression of RLM. The marketplace is much more complicated than this.

Basic or not, it is a fact based on the belief that money moves lines. In Pats game game for instance, there was more money bet by the 31% on Lions than there was by the 69% on Pats. Draw your own conclusions from there?

[phillybadboy]

[Totolover1409]

Jags comin back?

[bobbyk1133]

Basic or not, it is a fact based on the belief that money moves lines. In Pats game game for instance, there was more money bet by the 31% on Lions than there was by the 69% on Pats. Draw your own conclusions from there?

This is wrong. The books are exposed with NE tonight. Where did you come up with that assumption that more $$ is on DET? Based on the RLM? This is what I'm talking about that it's not as basic and straight forward as it appears on the surface.

[LolsMcwinsey]

[LolsMcwinsey]

Jags are beat. Let's hope the Lions perform

jags winning 32-17

[OKsoccer24]

Things are looking good for tonight!

[rochestertitans]

daddy gonna hit big.. titans should still lose

[alamo]

Fck Chicago. Useless cunts

[Totolover1409]

Fck the Jags LOL

[BetWhisperer]

Wow this guy is good. Thanks for the picks.

[LolsMcwinsey]

yep fck the jags. fumbled the game away

[rochestertitans]

got the big ones!

[FlaxMartin]

Yeah, that´s good. But the jags. LMFAO

[Sidetracked]

another nice day, joined u on bears and lions...had the bills instead of the jags but i think we both lost that game for the headache it gave me

[bobbyk1133]

Belichick plays to the end. Not only are the patriots starters going to shred the Lions, their backups will be even more dominant. Hoyer's better than a lot of starters in the league. Hey who knows, watch out for Haynesworth too, he's practicing again. Don't let your hate of the patriots blind you. I won't hide if the Lions win.

Pats weren't so god-like after all.

I am leaning towards taking them in week 1 though.

[Sidetracked]

any input on saints/oakland tomm? leaning towards saints

[rochestertitans]

good luck on that Lions bet, not a chance in hell

bump

[aussieH]

Great tips. Any more confidence on tomorrow's game

[funnyman]

Another good night. Great call on Chicago.