2011 NFL System - JM and Modified

jphil · 10-23-11, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by hagball52

I didn't trust it so I have a teaser with MIA +8.5 and STL +21 for the 2 (C) bets. I know I shouldn't be doing it this way but......so far it seems the right way.

gl w/ that hagball 52. could end up being the wager of the day, w/ this sys. anyways.
just been playin b/c bets myself, but still lightened up on these 2 C's.
ya know jm had to have had the right spread @ the right time on mia.

Stanley77 · 10-23-11, 05:01 PM

There have been a few series losses under this 3-game chase system. This means that there have been teams that have actually lost at least 6 games SU and ATS. I checked every NFL team from their past results on covers.com.

I would say that NFL Betting System from Coach Thompson is way better than the Sports Betting Champ NFL systems. His systems are a little bit similar to the Sports Betting Champ NFL systems. According to Coach Thompson, the Dolphins and Rams are "A" bets. Somehow he said to bet on the Rams last week and three weeks ago, but he said that the reason why it's still an "A" bet was because we have to risk increasing 2 units on this play.

COYLO · 10-23-11, 05:11 PM

what was the spread @ mia

Brundle99 · 10-23-11, 05:46 PM

Originally posted by COYLO

what was the spread @ mia

think it was +1 at close.

GGPLAYER · 10-23-11, 05:56 PM

I'm done with these. Miami (I had Mia +2) has screwed up the last two weeks so badly it is making me sick! Sersioulsy I'm really pissed off right now. I would have had a very profitable day without that choke of chokes! Now St. Louis starting to look like shit. Week in and week out these JM plays are almost always my only loses and I'm done with it. Good luck the rest of the season if you stick with these. All I can say is I hope the NBA lockout ends soon!

oklahoma · 10-23-11, 06:03 PM

Originally posted by GGPLAYER

Good luck the rest of the season if you stick with these. All I can say is I hope the NBA lockout ends soon!

on3 nhl system is fairing much better, same as JM though theres only been 2 or 3 plays so far for that one.

bruloc · 10-23-11, 06:11 PM

Invencible stands for what?

edh1011 · 10-23-11, 06:13 PM

this is exactly why you labby and not chase. and these games today should not have been plays since both teams are without their starting qb.

oklahoma · 10-23-11, 06:16 PM

Originally posted by edh1011

this is exactly why you labby and not chase. and these games today should not have been plays since both teams are without their starting qb.

aw man my time machine is on the fritz again, the one day when i would have really needed it. if only you were here earlier...

xgame · 10-23-11, 06:19 PM

2c dead. WTF!!!! f***k f***k f***k

doublej95 · 10-23-11, 06:25 PM

rough day

edh1011 · 10-23-11, 06:37 PM

Only the rams could make dallas look good lol

hagball52 · 10-23-11, 06:38 PM

Originally posted by jphil

gl w/ that hagball 52. could end up being the wager of the day, w/ this sys. anyways.
just been playin b/c bets myself, but still lightened up on these 2 C's.
ya know jm had to have had the right spread @ the right time on mia.

If JM claims anything other than a loss on MIA I'm gonna send him a bomb in the mail. I better put an lol at the end of that so no one takes me seriously. But for real the spread never went over +1 1/2 for MIA. According to his rules you should have played it that way. I think I'll wait to see if he sends anything out before I write him.

I don't know what happened with STL at the end. They had a 1st and goal and I left the room and came back and the game was over 34-7. I'm going WTF! happened. Did they fumble or something? 34-14 and I woulda cashed a nice ticket. Today sucked big time.

bauerranch · 10-23-11, 06:44 PM

The St Louis Baseball team can out score the FootBall team- pathetic
Go Cardinals !

edh1011 · 10-23-11, 06:47 PM

No fumble. Just couldnt get in the end zone on 4 trys against a bad D. Like I said only the rams could pull this off

hagball52 · 10-23-11, 06:58 PM

Holy F***!

The one thing I've learned about these chase (progressive) betting systems is that they really tax your bankroll at times like this. I think it should only be a part of what you do and to me you should start your first (A) bet with 1% of your roll. Labby's help but they can string losses out to a degree also. I just think smart management and discipline go a long way. I've also been playing a lot of straight bets and when you lose you lose and move on. Chase betting can be very stressful. At some point I may look at hedging against really bad teams but I know that can be a recipe for disaster. I didn't think 2 (C) bets would lose on the same day, not to mention the (A) bet also. This is a dark day in JM land.

NZT-48 · 10-23-11, 07:27 PM

I think this system is now officially fubared wow unreal never thought Id see the day on this one and it wasnt if I was rooting for it either not only did Miami choke but geez Rams lose too and the A bet for Arizona tanks like wow cant wait to read what JM says about this if he says anything at all

jphil · 10-23-11, 10:02 PM

shoulda played NOR!

hagball52 · 10-23-11, 11:10 PM

I had 2 tickets cash and 1 push that kind of softened the blow for me. All I needed at the end of the day was for New Orleans to cover on a 3 teamer for me. Hopefully that was it for Invincible as far as losses. Dare we load up on the next bets to recover.

oklahoma · 10-23-11, 11:43 PM

Originally posted by hagball52

Dare we load up on the next bets to recover.

that was a fleeting thought in my head when i realized the rams +13.5 went down the toilet. but to hear someone else suggest it is totally different. think i may have to do some research on the upcoming plays.

Andy3568 · 10-24-11, 12:13 AM

Well, today was a really bad day... unless you're a Saints

fan. Where did Reggie Bush end up again.

Speaking of the Colts, they are a play starting next week. What was someone saying about hedging against really bad teams?

Seriously, I hope this is it for the "C" losses. I am interested in what JM is going to say about today. He'll probably add a QB injury filter and drop the losses. What really pisses me off about that is not that he goes back and changes the record based on the new filter. It's that he goes back and removes the losses based on the new filter, but if there were any wins where the QB was injured, those still count. He's a douche.

Brundle99 · 10-24-11, 05:35 AM

Originally posted by hagball52

I had 2 tickets cash and 1 push that kind of softened the blow for me. All I needed at the end of the day was for New Orleans to cover on a 3 teamer for me. Hopefully that was it for Invincible as far as losses. Dare we load up on the next bets to recover.

Hagball, when JM eventually decides to send the next email out, could you post it here, so we can all see how he will justify this one.

Thanks

< ME
^JM

hagball52 · 10-24-11, 08:48 AM

Originally posted by Brundle99

Hagball, when JM eventually decides to send the next email out, could you post it here, so we can all see how he will justify this one.

Thanks

< ME
^JM

Sure thing. I'm getting ready to write him anyway. I'll post whatever I write and his responses.

jcygts6 · 10-24-11, 09:42 AM

Yesterday was killer... Staying away from shit teams. They always find a way to f\*\*k up your money. I had rams in a teaser up to +24.5 and they couldn't even get it home when they had 1st and goal at the 2 yd line... That is just seriously lame.

Andy3568 · 10-24-11, 09:55 AM

Originally posted by hagball52

Sure thing. I'm getting ready to write him anyway. I'll post whatever I write and his responses.

Please do, hagball.

I'd also like to see how he handles the situation with future bets involving teams that lose a "C" bet. By the rules, they qualify as a play because they've lost the last 3 both SU an ATS. I know we stop chasing after the "C" bet, but when do they become eligible for a system play again? If they lose the next three? Or do we wait until they win and/or cover the spread and then start counting losses?

doublej95 · 10-24-11, 10:01 AM

Arizona doesn't look like a good B bet going to the Ravens next week.

jphil · 10-24-11, 10:15 AM

jm will claim that we should have started the season in nov. due to the labor dispute setback.

jphil · 10-24-11, 10:35 AM

sure wish i grabbed that +2 on mia. @ betf'us. I woulda bht. the 1.5. So much for waitin' till gametime.

Wallco99 · 10-24-11, 12:09 PM

Originally posted by Andy3568

Please do, hagball.

I'd also like to see how he handles the situation with future bets involving teams that lose a "C" bet. By the rules, they qualify as a play because they've lost the last 3 both SU an ATS. I know we stop chasing after the "C" bet, but when do they become eligible for a system play again? If they lose the next three? Or do we wait until they win and/or cover the spread and then start counting losses?

That is a good question, I wondered the same thing. They have 6 in a row now. Is next week an (A) bet again?

on3 · 10-24-11, 03:16 PM

rough week all around. will update after tonight's game.

on3 · 10-24-11, 03:18 PM

Originally posted by Wallco99

That is a good question, I wondered the same thing. They have 6 in a row now. Is next week an (A) bet again?

Let's just take them the whole year and by game 16 we risk a couple thousand units to win back our one.

pwireless · 10-24-11, 03:18 PM

Sportsbettingstar.com weekly results
St Louis Cardinals bet 1
10/19 WON
Texas Rangers Bet 1
10/20 WON
NO Saints
10/23 WON
Tonight's Bet 1
Baltimore Ravens -6.5
(line has moved up since Chad emailed the pick)
Bet 1 is a Bet A
Bet 2 is a Bet B
Bet 3 is a Bet C
For this who follow John morrisons

MARCUS · 10-24-11, 04:35 PM

thanks..where is coach thompson?...

pwireless · 10-24-11, 04:40 PM

It's sportsbettingstar.com not coach thompson.

MARCUS · 10-24-11, 05:03 PM

thanks..any comment's + or -?