***** College Totals *****

[doubledime]

Good work as usual. You are to CBB betting what I am to NHL betting. Cheers!

Thanks Flea and yes you are hot in the NHL Keep it up

[doubledime]

Good morning,

Yesterday:

Regular Plays: 4-0-1

First Half Unders: 4-1

YTD:

Regular Plays: 29-15

First Half Unders: 10-3

Note: Though it's a loser for our records, if anyone played the NW/M St. first half game early afternoon, they got a push (65)

Good luck

[doubledime]

Points Awarded:

Letsgovols22 gave doubledime 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

Thanks for the points

[doubledime]

Good morning,

Limited time this morning so I will be back with the afternoon card later.

Saturday's Plays:

531 C of C/Elon under 130
535 SMU/EC under 121
537 Lou/IN over 144.5
543 CPS/Princ under 136.5

Play the under first half on the under plays

Good luck

[playr101]

GL today as always

[HeeluvaGuy]

Best of luck today DD!

[AceofSP2107]

DD thanks for your plays like always ,, enjoy your New Years

[doubledime]

Thank you everyone. Will have the night card shortly

[Flea Hotel]

It'd be nice if I could get a bit of thanks for being the one who suggested the whole 1H thing in the first place. Oh well. My NHL winners and your NCAAB winners are all the thanks I need.

[doubledime]

Good afternoon,

The rest of Saturday's card:

571 ULMon/ALRock under 133
575 Temp/CFL under 128
631 Web/Mont under 138.5
639 /PS over 155

Here are a couple that just missed the cut. They are NOT plays but I'l give them out for those who handicap their own as a "sounding board"

573 WY/UNLV over
597 SD/St. Mary under

Good luck

[doubledime]

FYI

The 3 unders that lost in the first half not only went on to win the game, but also won the second half under. May be something to watch.

[doubledime]

The under in the Weber/Mont game for the second half is 77.5. I'm going to take another bite of the apple and play the under, figuring they won't score 154.5 points for the game. We'll see
DD

[Penguin7]

FYI

The 3 unders that lost in the first half not only went on to win the game, but also won the second half under. May be something to watch.

when i have more free time and get to watch full games and i like the under i usually play full game for 1u and first half for 0.5 and if the first half loses ill double down on 2h. hard to lose all 3

[freeVICK]

penetrating swept in the night games

[doubledime]

The under in the Weber/Mont game for the second half is 77.5. I'm going to take another bite of the apple and play the under, figuring they won't score 154.5 points for the game. We'll see
DD

This lost, but only because of overtime, which is always a possibility. However, if this game does not go into over time, the second half unders, when the game is over in the first first half, go 4-0 today. Stay tuned!

[fataliz]

It'd be nice if I could get a bit of thanks for being the one who suggested the whole 1H thing in the first place. Oh well. My NHL winners and your NCAAB winners are all the thanks I need.

thanks!

[cmatth1326]

Thanks for all of the work you put in.

[doubledime]

Thanks for all of the work you put in.

Not sure if your thanking me or Flea Hotel? Either way thanks

[doubledime]

Good evening,

Earlier today:

Regular Plays: 3-5

First Half Unders: 3-3

YTD:

Regular Plays: 32-20

First Half Unders: 13-6

Some comments on today going forward:

1. As we mentioned in an earlier post, betting the second half under when the first have goes over on an under play, went 3-1 today with the only loss being due to an overtime, or it would have been 4-0. We will be watching that closely and let you know the results.

2. Our "just missed the cut plays" went 2-1, if you would have played the under in the first half of the under play. Never fails when I don't release them as a regular play.

3. Which brings me to my third and final point. I basically have one 3 metrics that I use to make about 85% of my decision to post a play. The other metrics that I use either re-enforces that play or takes me off of it. Since I do not like releasing a lot of plays I try to find reasons not to post a play to keep the number down. Looking back the last three weeks I see that I should have released all those plays based just on the three metrics. Today for example, my "just missed" plays went 2-1 if you would have played the first half under, and I actually had others today that were winners, but I found reasons not to post them.

Here is my quandary: Though I am very confident in my 3 metrics that I use to keep giving us winners, it's going to mean a lot more plays and though over the entire season I feel strongly that we will be on the plus side, there are no guarantees and I don't want anyone to get hurt if I post a lot of plays and we have a bad day or two. I don't care if anyone believes me or not, but if I would have posted all my plays today we would have been significantly on the plus side today. Honestly, I'm not sure what to do. I have been doing this for so long I know I have discipline and money management control. I could weather a losing streak I am sure many of you could say the same thing, but others I'm afraid do not.

Let me know what you think.

Happy New Year

Good luck

[DU46]

I think you should keep using your 3 metrics, that keeps the volume a little lower than if you also gave out your "almost" plays.

[doubledime]

I think you should keep using your 3 metrics, that keeps the volume a little lower than if you also gave out your "almost" plays.

Thanks DU Actually, if I use just the 3 metrics I'll be posting many more plays.

[DU46]

Is there a fourth metric you could use as a filter to reduce the number of plays?

[doubledime]

Is there a fourth metric you could use as a filter to reduce the number of plays?

That's my quandary, when I use other filters, at least so far this season, it produces less plays but leaves winners on the table.

[knicksrulez]

That's my quandary, when I use other filters, at least so far this season, it produces less plays but leaves winners on the table.

Hey DD, first thanks for everything, mu opnion is to just keep up with the volume as of now, much easier to wear down a losing streak with lower volume. I followed your bases season and I think your method is fantastic. As you said is a matter of discipline to win in the long term

Thanks bro

[cooperman]

DD Thanks for the plays and hard work you put in. Much success to you in 2017!

[doubledime]

DD Thanks for the plays and hard work you put in. Much success to you in 2017!

[Fred The Hammer]

Nice work & good luck in 2017!!! Any thoughts on Minn/Purdue 140.5? I have it at 77-68 Purdue Over

[Fred The Hammer]

Look at my bet points....I can't lose today I haven't bet anything recently or manipulated them to 2017. Weird?

[doubledime]

Nice work & good luck in 2017!!! Any thoughts on Minn/Purdue 140.5? I have it at 77-68 Purdue Over

Like the over on that one

[doubledime]

Good morning,

Here is a game that goes in 20 minutes.

Neb/Mary under 140

Back with rest

Good luck

[rgrant2214]

137.5 at my book

[doubledime]

Good morning,

I apologize for the previous post being so close to start time. I just did not realize it was that early of a game.

After much thought I have decided to release all my games. We're all adults here (HOPEFULLY) and if you play them I recommend to play them with 2% of your bankroll, or pick and choose or don't play any of them. I post them for informational purposes only and the rest is up to the individual.

I will keep track of every first half under play AND playing the second half under if the first half goes over on an under play. (hope that makes sense)

Having said all that here are Sunday's Plays:

717 IL St/Loy under 132
721 Neb/Mary under 140
723 St. J/Dep over 149.5
727 Prov/But under 140.5
729 Min/Pur over 140.5
731 N I/Evan under 118
739 Marq/SH over 155
749 AZ/Stan under 137
751 Was St./Was over 164

Fasten your seat belts

Good luck

[rgrant2214]

The game doesn't start until 9

[doubledime]

137.5 at my book

10 minutes ago 5 Dimes was at 140

[rgrant2214]

Yeah 137.5 at will hill