agree on pacers. they ownz the nets, 5-0 last 5 games. last time they lost to the nets was in dec 2008?
Comment
alukk
SBR MVP
01-29-09
1544
#37
Originally posted by vyomguy
Pacers have been horrible on the road and still -3.5 favorites????...ask yourself why???... when nets have been playing great at home with or without d.williams. Line already moved 1 point from the opener...the sharps have the early action. In this game, both sharps and squares seem to be on the same side.
Whats the point here? your traying to say indiana covers for sure or something like that?
Comment
demens
SBR MVP
10-22-10
2785
#38
Pacers were favorites in NJ last time they played and thats when the Nets had Harris and Favors. What exactly is "fishy" about this line/
HIDE YO KIDS.
Comment
tonyp0387
SBR Wise Guy
01-11-10
617
#39
Pacers always rip the Nets and they are 12-21 ATS away from home. No more playoff hopes the Nets are done.
Comment
lunchbawks
SBR Posting Legend
01-31-10
12873
#40
the game is in newark NJ
Comment
lunchbawks
SBR Posting Legend
01-31-10
12873
#41
anyone have a stream?
Comment
demens
SBR MVP
10-22-10
2785
#42
Originally posted by demens
I dont think the line will hit 4.
So much for closing at 4/4.5.
Damion James out in this one. Not the most relevant player on the Nets but when you considering Stephan Graham (arguably the worst player in the league) is replacing him in the starting line-up it might have an impact.
Comment
Mexes
SBR Wise Guy
11-27-09
691
#43
Originally posted by demens
So much for closing at 4/4.5.
Damion James out in this one. Not the most relevant player on the Nets but when you considering Stephan Graham (arguably the worst player in the league) is replacing him in the starting line-up it might have an impact.
hahaha you're right.
I don't know which brothers are worse
the Grahams or Jason+Jarron Collins
Comment
JOHON8
SBR Hall of Famer
01-28-10
7712
#44
This image is rolling in my head right now after taking the bait:
Comment
vyomguy
SBR Hall of Famer
12-08-09
5794
#45
Originally posted by JOHON8
This image is rolling in my head right now after taking the bait:
....I am sure the same image is in lunchbawks head
Gambling 101: Public wins 50% of times....say it 100 times....get it into your head.....Public wins 50% of times.
Comment
SportsTerminator
SBR Hall of Famer
02-18-09
5179
#46
Nets can put up a fight but overall Indiana is a better team. They have to many offensive weapons. If they had Deron Williams they prob. would have won. And most important the Nets struggle in closing games... 2nd half/4th quarter breakdown...
Bet To Win
Comment
lunchbawks
SBR Posting Legend
01-31-10
12873
#47
Originally posted by vyomguy
....I am sure the same image is in lunchbawks head
Gambling 101: Public wins 50% of times....say it 100 times....get it into your head.....Public wins 50% of times.
You are a joke. I didn't play the Nets.. where in this thread did I even hint at playing NJN?
I smell fishy I look elsewhere you winner.
Comment
Whippit
Restricted User
04-29-10
3065
#48
Originally posted by SportsTerminator
Nets can put up a fight but overall Indiana is a better team. They have to many offensive weapons. If they had Deron Williams they prob. would have won. And most important the Nets struggle in closing games... 2nd half/4th quarter breakdown...
Indy's jumpers fell all nite. Jersey's didn't. That doesn't mean Indy has offensive weapons, it just means their shots fell.
Last week Indy scored 76 pts against the Shewolves because the shots didn't fall. You win some, you lose some.
The only thing Indy does consistently is turn the ball over, particularly on the road, like they did tonite. If they shoot well enough to overcome that, they have a chance to win. But that's very difficult because it forces them to do more with less & they don't have the personnel with which to do that consistently. Jersey lost this game because they shot so terribly bad on wide open jumpers, not because Indy has too many offensive weapons. Indy has Granger, but that's about it.