No Coincidences vs. Dynamite Capping Challenge

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 01:07 AM

Play #15: CHI -3.5

Play #16: PHO/LAL under 199.5

Play #17: PHO +7

alien296 · 03-22-11, 02:50 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Play #15: CHI -3.5

Play #16: PHO/LAL under 199.5

Play #17: PHO +7

LOVE these picks tomorrow (threw a parlay on it and bought a few points here and there)....good luck buddy ....

WagerType:PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
Date: Team:
Mar 22 NBA [651] CHICAGO -½-170 (B+3)
Mar 22 NBA [655] PHOENIX +10-170 (B+3)
Mar 22 NBA [656] TOTAL u199½-110 (PHOENIX vrs LA LAKERS)
Risking 12 SBR To Win 45.79 SBR

aireent777 · 03-22-11, 02:57 AM

Love Chicago.

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 06:35 PM

Play #18: CHI/ATL under 182

paco · 03-22-11, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Play #15: CHI -3.5 Play

Not ur style here Nocoin, GL. I took the hawks +5 (bought up the hook)

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 06:51 PM

Originally posted by paco

Not ur style here Nocoin, GL. I took the hawks +5 (bought up the hook)

I know. I just think Rose will be on a mission again tonight after the last meltdown in ATL.

With that being said, I'm going to make a small play on ATL +5 at SIA. Neither this or the CHI -3.5 are big bets (also taking CHI ML).

rochestertitans · 03-22-11, 07:11 PM

i like over chic and over lal

kobefanatic · 03-22-11, 07:23 PM

what happened to the other guy? dynamite

nbaprofosor · 03-22-11, 07:36 PM

dynamite=he doesnt like the no co.he did all the trash and nasty talk about no co.but.now he is ghost .what a loser .this is so gayy

)))

Dexter · 03-22-11, 08:51 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

that's the only thing worth playing for. besides shoebox being a tout, that's the reason he left. we made that deal before the boston la series

i exposed shoebox last year. he was a clown TOUT MAKING FUN OF TOUTS ALL THE TIME IN HIS POSTS THEN HE DECDIED TO BECOME 1! he doubted me even when i called his magic future to win the eastern conference a loser and Boston would whoop the magic in a series.

did he not hedge on boston for 30u? he did goat

i can assure you that shoebox did not leave the forum for any reason other then being banned. i am trying to get him back as we speak!

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 08:56 PM

Originally posted by rochestertitans

i like over chic and over lal

You got the first one.

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 08:57 PM

Originally posted by Dexter

did he not hedge on boston for 30u? he did goat

i can assure you that shoebox did not leave the forum for any reason other then being banned. i am trying to get him back as we speak!

Why? So he can come back and get his panties in a bunch over stupid shit? He ranked right up there with GM as having the thinnest skin on these boards.

Dexter · 03-22-11, 09:11 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Why? So he can come back and get his panties in a bunch over stupid shit? He ranked right up there with GM as having the thinnest skin on these boards.

b/c hes my friend and one of the few guys who has the balls to post all of his plays each season and document the record.

plus, hes a pretty good capper at mlb and nba....

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by Dexter

b/c hes my friend and one of the few guys who has the balls to post all of his plays each season and document the record.

plus, hes a pretty good capper at mlb and nba....

He does? Last I remember, he stopped doing that and cryptically made comments after the fact about plays he and TA were concocting behind the scenes.

I don't question for a minute that shoe's a good capper. He's damn good. But to say he steadily made plays, posted them and kept records -- especially late in his posting career here -- is revisionist history. He doesn't plug away like you and jgb, Dex. You know that.

Dexter · 03-22-11, 09:27 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

He does? Last I remember, he stopped doing that and cryptically made comments after the fact about plays he and TA were concocting behind the scenes.

I don't question for a minute that shoe's a good capper. He's damn good. But to say he steadily made plays, posted them and kept records -- especially late in his posting career here -- is revisionist history. He doesn't plug away like you and jgb, Dex. You know that.

that was once he opened his business...

he still had at least one full season of mlb and nba success documented and posted....

No coincidences · 03-22-11, 09:33 PM

Originally posted by Dexter

that was once he opened his business...

he still had at least one full season of mlb and nba success documented and posted....

So if he has his "business", why would he come back here to post for us mere mortals?

That's why I like you and jgb, Dex. All the sports, and no stupid drama on the side. Just plays and records.

dynamite140 · 03-23-11, 02:02 AM

Play #11 Spurs/Nuggets OVER 210.5

Play #12 Magic/Knicks UNDER 203

Play #13 Jazz/Thunder UNDER 202

Play #14 Heat/Pistons OVER 199

Play #15 Thunder -10

Play #16 Hawks +6.5

NBA_Brosuf · 03-23-11, 02:13 AM

Hey now, don't be picking my picks.

LOL

No coincidences · 03-23-11, 01:49 PM

Play #19: MEM +6.5
Play #20: NY +1.5
Play #21: LAC/WASH over 203
Play #22: DET/MIA over 198
Play #23: DEN/SA under 211.5

No coincidences · 03-23-11, 01:58 PM

Play #24 (gulp): CLE +3

Bo$$ Bet$ · 03-23-11, 02:34 PM

i love people on here....whats the score on the head 2 head matchup?

No coincidences · 03-23-11, 05:13 PM

Originally posted by Bo$$ Bet$

i love people on here....whats the score on the head 2 head matchup?

Still average vs. slightly less than average.

If you're tailing one of us, may the gambling gods have mercy on your soul.

No coincidences · 03-23-11, 09:02 PM

Painful losses with CLE and DET/MIA over (which we both had).

Ouch.

No coincidences · 03-24-11, 12:33 AM

Nice night, dynamite. 4-2 to my 2-4. You escaped with OKC and the under late, I got burned with Cleveland, and we both got bent over on the MIA/DET over.

Hanlidin · 03-24-11, 01:21 AM

no offense, you guys are very average at best. I can probably blindly pick OVER on the next 20 games and still be 40-50% (which is right around where you guys are). Why is there this "competition"?? I really don't think you guys will even be over 45% in 75 games in all honesty.

Dynashit shouldn't be talking shit about NoCo if he's not even a 50%+ capper to begin this stupid "competition"

I like NoCo's random posts most of the time anyways.....

dynamite140 · 03-24-11, 01:22 AM

How in the world did i escape with OKC and the under late? The score was 78-69 Oklahoma City at the end of the 3rd quarter. OKC was up by 16 and it was 100-84 with 3:59 left. They were leading by Double Digits the entire 4th quarter. Are you kidding me that i escaped?

It was on pace for them to cover and go under once it was under 6 minutes.

If Oklahoma City didn't cover, it would have been a moose in the last few minutes. You acting like OKC got lucky at the end when they were covering practically the entire 4th quarter.

Of course... when you a bet late in the game, you never say a word that you ESCAPED and say look at my 3-1 record for the nightand act all cocky

. You nothing but a sore loser looking for reasons when you do have a bad night.

If you had OKC and under and I had Cleveland, OF COURSE you won't mention that in this post and we all know that.

JOHON8 · 03-24-11, 01:24 AM

Can you guys try something? Just post fades of jjgold, apricot, bobby and the rest of this gang. Can you try this at least once by gathering up all their plays around the forum and fading them as your own plays for 1 day?

Hanlidin · 03-24-11, 01:29 AM

Originally posted by dynamite140

How in the world did i escape with OKC and the under late? The score was 78-69 Oklahoma City at the end of the 3rd quarter. OKC was up by 16 and it was 100-84 with 3:59 left. They were leading by Double Digits the entire 4th quarter. Are you kidding me that i escaped?

It was on pace for them to cover and go under once it was under 6 minutes.

If Oklahoma City didn't cover, it would have been a moose in the last few minutes. You acting like OKC got lucky at the end when they were covering practically the entire 4th quarter.

Of course... when you a bet late in the game, you never say a word that you ESCAPED and say look at my 3-1 record for the nightand act all cocky

. You nothing but a sore loser looking for reasons when you do have a bad night.

If you had OKC and under and I had Cleveland, OF COURSE you won't mention that in this post and we all know that.

Dynashit, NoCo's comments was'nt even bashing your close wins/loses. Are you a retard?? Stop talking your shit when you're average at BEST.

dynamite140 · 03-24-11, 01:34 AM

Check out no coincidence's posts. He keep bragging when he wins and never EVER mentions his lucky wins at the end.

Why is it because i did better than him tonight that he had to say i got LUCKY with OKC and the under when those were doing very well in the 4th quarter and they were leading by DD the entire quarter.

Did you ever hear me say that he got real lucky with his picks? Nope. Because I'm not a sore loser like him and have to give excuses. If i had Cleveland +3 and he had Oklahoma City -10 and the under, you think i would post that in a thread and say he got lucky and i didn't?

He made that comment as an excuse. Why else would he even bring this comment up?

No coincidences · 03-24-11, 01:34 AM

Originally posted by dynamite140

How in the world did i escape with OKC and the under late?

0:14: Gordon Hayward misses 23-foot jumper (94-106)
0:13: Serge Ibaka defensive rebound

Did this not happen? Hayward hits that shot, the game goes over, Utah covers and you're 2-4. That's not an escape?

face · 03-24-11, 01:44 AM

wow, bad record, one of you should cheat and tail someone good.

No coincidences · 03-24-11, 01:47 AM

Originally posted by face

wow, bad record, one of you should cheat and tail someone good.

You're winning big in the NBA right now I take it? Maybe I should tail you.

dynamite140 · 03-24-11, 01:48 AM

They were winning by Double Digits the entire 4th quarter and the pace was under until the Jazz caught up and . You acting like i got lucky and OKC was up 3 points in the last minute and scored 9 points to cover the game like how the suns covered against the Raptors in the last minute.

Here's another thing. Why do you keep on whining? I have NEVER seen you made ONE POST where you said you got lucky at the end of a game. Explain that then.

You think i would come into this thread and make that kind of comment like you just did? If i had Cleveland and you had thunder and under, you think that comment will ever go out from you that you escaped and i got burned? You think i would comment that you got lucky and i didn't? No way

. Quit being a sore loser.

Do you see me creating 3-5 useless threads every single day complaining when a bet doesn't go my way like the way you do? Many posters have told you to quit posting useless threads. You complained about the Bucks and complained that they calling too many whistles in the Spurs/Nuggets game... obviously because you had the under.

I can't find anything YOU CAN'T COMPLAIN ABOUT

Pauulzcappin · 03-24-11, 01:52 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You're winning big in the NBA right now I take it? Maybe I should tail you.

face · 03-24-11, 01:54 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You're winning big in the NBA right now I take it? Maybe I should tail you.

haha, touche