No Coincidences vs. Dynamite Capping Challenge

Goat Milk · 03-19-11, 10:21 PM

would you like me to find the quote with you saying that no coincidences. i dont want to clog your thread here with these arguments

Goat Milk · 03-19-11, 10:23 PM

no coincidences if you don't like what i have to contribute to the forum, just put me on ignore. its not that hard.

No coincidences · 03-19-11, 10:28 PM

--

With me saying what?

I do like what you contribute pick-wise, Goat. I think you're good. Maybe not as good as you think you are, but still a lot better than most of the board.

With that being said, I've told you before that you always seem to have a weird vendetta against other successful posters. Do you not see a pattern there?

Goat Milk · 03-19-11, 10:32 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

With me saying what?

I do like what you contribute pick-wise, Goat. I think you're good. Maybe not as good as you think you are, but still a lot better than most of the board.

With that being said, I've told you before that you always seem to have a weird vendetta against other successful posters. Do you not see a pattern there?

No coincidences who are the successful posters here that i have prblems with? I only had a problem with 1 guy that was shoebox because he talked about touts all the time then ended up being one. I don't even have a problem with lakerman. Me and Dexter are cool. I am cool with paco and paul and obama, and several others like snowball that have been posting consistnatly in the nba section for over a year now.

SweetJones has asked for my opinion many times as well and I have gotten great information from him as well. I have a problem with guys like JR007 and Demons, do you consider these successful posters?

demens · 03-19-11, 10:35 PM

Learn to spell my name right Ghost milk. I did not even realize you had a problem with me. Is it because i think you are stupid? I'm sorry, but i can not help it if you are, there is no reason why you should dislike me for it.

No coincidences · 03-19-11, 10:37 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

No coincidences who are the successful posters here that i have prblems with? I only had a problem with 1 guy that was shoebox because he talked about touts all the time then ended up being one. I don't even have a problem with lakerman. Me and Dexter are cool. I am cool with paco and paul and obama, and several others like snowball that have been posting consistnatly in the nba section for over a year now.

SweetJones has asked for my opinion many times as well and I have gotten great information from him as well. I have a problem with guys like JR007 and Demons, do you consider these successful posters?

Demens is pompous, but yes, he knows his shit. What about Rudy? Lyon? And you've had issues in the past with LB and paco both -- don't deny it. You're a drama queen.

No coincidences · 03-19-11, 10:38 PM

Originally posted by demens

Learn to spell my name right Ghost milk. I did not even realize you had a problem with me. Is it because i think you are stupid? I'm sorry, but i can not help it if you are, there is no reason why you should dislike me for it.

You, on the other hand, take arrogance to a new level.

You know what they say about people who constantly think they're better than everyone else? That they're always right and the rest of the world is always wrong?

At least GM posts his plays. In fact, almost every regular around here posts their plays. Where are yours? I think you'd rather be a backseat driver commenting on how stupid everyone else is than put your plays on the line.

Goat Milk · 03-19-11, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Demens is pompous, but yes, he knows his shit. What about Rudy? Lyon? And you've had issues in the past with LB and paco both -- don't deny it. You're a drama queen.

Yeah why would I like you Demons if you call everyone on the board stupid? Rudy is not an nba poster, NC. He is a players talk loser looking for attention. I have no problems with Lyon- he may with me- but I am here to get information and he can provide that.

Do you remember the incident with Paco? I came "onto the scene" last year when Paco and LakerBoy had their thread, I just started posting my picks and analysis and Paco needed the spotlight so he got mad. Whenever I would disagree with something and provide reasons, i would get shut down. People thought LakerMan was a gift to the forum and now he has dug his followers so deep there is no returning back. Do you know why LakerMan said he's not cool with me anymore? I disagreed with 3 of his large wagers (i think 2 were NFL) respectfully in his thread and all 3 of his picks lost- then he PMd me when he was drunk after the losses and said "were not cool anymore".

I don't even have any problems with the guy. Only when he posts one of his big plays and gives the shittiest reasons for it and expects us to think its valuable information.

I'm going out for the night, if you want to continue discussing post in my thread and i will read it when i get home

Goat Milk · 03-19-11, 10:47 PM

I realize I can say things that may be confrontational. you have to understand i am drink a lot at night and am cocky in real life as well. I am not a dick like demons. if you don't like me you can put me on ignore. i am here to get information and give information and some people think the information i provide is something anyone can come up with but its not. anyway i am out for a bit

paco · 03-19-11, 10:57 PM

GoatMilk and I had our disagreements long time ago and we talked it out like men and have been friends since. Ive made some nice coin off some of his big plays and im sure he has done the same.

Qtip · 03-20-11, 03:01 AM

What a worthless thread, thought I was coming into a capping competition of some sort. !0 minutes I'll never get back.

GAMBLOR777 · 03-20-11, 03:48 AM

so there's no comp?

I'll smoke all of ya's chumps

GOAT is G.O.A.T

GarbageMan · 03-20-11, 03:54 AM

You were 110% right NC, what an utterly pointless and depressing thread. Good luck with your picks man you deserve better than this...

aireent777 · 03-20-11, 04:12 AM

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 03:44 PM

Play #7: Portland +6

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 04:00 PM

Play #8: TOR/OKC over 206.5
Play #9: GS/DAL under 213

Pauulzcappin · 03-20-11, 04:11 PM

You gotta keep their record up, Shroom

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by Pauulzcappin

You gotta keep their record up, Shroom

Me so far = mediocre.
Him = one game less than mediocre.

This is about as exciting as watching paint dry -- especially given the fact that it's March Madness and the tourney's where it's at.

Monitor-Tan · 03-20-11, 04:26 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Me so far = mediocre.
Him = one game less than mediocre.

This is about as exciting as watching paint dry -- especially given the fact that it's March Madness and the tourney's where it's at.

Lol that's exactly what vegas are saying =P

lunchbawks · 03-20-11, 04:33 PM

im all over the raptors/ thunder o207.5. its going to cash im 57% sure

bought to o207.5 pays +104

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 04:39 PM

Originally posted by lunchbawks

im all over the raptors/ thunder o207.5. its going to cash im 57% sure

bought to o207.5 pays +104

If Pinny drops it to 206, I might lay the hammer.

GL lunch.

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 06:08 PM

Hey lunch -- total bottomed out at 206 at Pinny and is now 207.5 right before tip.

Goat Milk · 03-20-11, 06:29 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Play #1: Knicks/Pistons UNDER 214.5

Originally posted by dynamite140

Play #2: Spurs/Mavericks OVER 200

Originally posted by dynamite140

Play #3: Nets/Bucks UNDER 177.5

Originally posted by dynamite140

Play #4 Bobcats/Spurs OVER 191.5

Play #5 Nuggets/Heat OVER 204.5

Play #6 Celtics/ Hornets OVER 177

Dynamite
Play 1 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 2 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 3 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 4 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 5 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 6 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units

YTD: 2-4 -2.4 Units

Originally posted by No coincidences

Play #1: Magic -6
Play #2: ORL/DEN under 205

Originally posted by No coincidences

Play #3: SA/CHA under 191.5
Play #4: DEN/MIA under 204.5
Play #5: Memphis -9

Originally posted by No coincidences

Play #6: Philadelphia +7

No Coincidences
Play 1 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 2 Results: WIN +1 Units
Play 3 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 4 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 5 Results: Win +1 Unit
Play 6 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units

YTD: 3-3 -0.3 UNITS

No coincidences · 03-20-11, 06:43 PM

Late $$$ hit the DAL/GS over.

sportman1313 · 03-20-11, 11:27 PM

uh oh, nocoin with an early lead.....congrats bud, hopefully you both do well

Pauulzcappin · 03-21-11, 12:03 AM

Coins is 5-4 now. Dynamite probably already gave up

No coincidences · 03-21-11, 12:12 AM

Originally posted by Pauulzcappin

Coins is 5-4 now. Dynamite probably already gave up

5-4. Impressive.

I went 6-1 on NCAAB plays today, Paul, and 16-11 overall on NCAA Tournament picks in the first two rounds.

Pauulzcappin · 03-21-11, 12:14 AM

Sign me up for these lol

I don't hang out at college forums ever so meh

BetterBizness · 03-21-11, 12:18 AM

With respect (and lack of)... NC I enjoy seeing your picks here regardless of the reasoning... I can also fade premature explosion for extra incentive when need be...

BetterBizness · 03-21-11, 12:27 AM

dynadonk are you ever going to post in this thread.. at least give the fans/haters something to talk about...

Broken-Ear Glen · 03-21-11, 08:10 AM

Originally posted by betterbizness

dynashit are you ever going to post in this thread.. At least give the fans/haters something to talk about...

fixed.

tonyno · 03-21-11, 08:45 AM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Dynamite
Play 1 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 2 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 3 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 4 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 5 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 6 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units

YTD: 2-4 -2.4 Units

No Coincidences
Play 1 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 2 Results: WIN +1 Units
Play 3 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units
Play 4 Results: WIN +1 Unit
Play 5 Results: Win +1 Unit
Play 6 Results: LOSS -1.1 Units

YTD: 3-3 -0.3 UNITS

No much of a challenge.

dynamite140 · 03-21-11, 12:54 PM

Play #7: Warriors +11

Play #8: Pacers -3.5

Play #9: Magic -12

Play #10: Celtics/Knicks UNDER 197.5

No coincidences · 03-21-11, 01:16 PM

Play #10: TOR +12.5

Play #11: CHI/SAC over 196.5

Play #12: GS +11

Play #13: SAC +15.5

Play #14: MEM -8

The fact that we're both on the Warriors should tell you to jump on the Spurs now.

8ArIvd5 · 03-21-11, 10:43 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Me so far = mediocre.
Him = one game less than mediocre.

This is about as exciting as watching paint dry -- especially given the fact that it's March Madness and the tourney's where it's at.

Good point. This comp should be postponed until the playoffs. That's when the real handicapping comes into play. Each person makes 1 pick for each game. That'd be worth tracking.