Very True JW.....
John Morrison 2010 NBA
Collapse
X
-
stevexSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-02-10
- 5122
#5461Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5463Chase 110
2010-11 System to date: 68-0
System Rules can be found in post #5000
System Backtest can be found in post #5000
(3/10/11) Miami (+1) (C) – Win
(A) 41-27
(B) 16-11
(C) 8-3
(D) 3-0
Next games:
(3/11/11) Portland @ Charlotte Bobcats (A)
(3/11/11) Atlanta Hawks @ Chicago (A)
(3/11/11) Indiana Pacers @ Toronto (A)Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5464The death threats can stop now. lol. Good job to those of you who stuck with it.Comment -
SkivChefSBR Wise Guy
- 10-19-09
- 730
#5465Chase 110
2010-11 System to date: 68-0
System Rules can be found in post #5000
System Backtest can be found in post #5000
(3/10/11) Miami (+1) (C) – Win
(A) 41-27
(B) 16-11
(C) 8-3
(D) 3-0
Next games:
(3/11/11) Portland @ Charlotte Bobcats (A)
(3/11/11) Atlanta Hawks @ Chicago (A)
(3/11/11) Indiana Pacers @ Toronto (A)Comment -
JW CashSBR MVP
- 12-31-08
- 4453
#5466Did We Really go 3-0 Tonight at JW Hockey ????????????
Check it out in the Hockey Forum to see if its just another ugly Rumor........
Comment -
clamchowderSBR Sharp
- 02-26-11
- 471
#5467Now that you've been there done that, it's time to stick with the system. Use your discipline Luke, stay with the system. May the discipline be with you.Comment -
1gamerSBR Wise Guy
- 02-09-11
- 723
#5468CHASE110...CASH IT!Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#5469Aajh, i want to start follow both chase 110 and JW hockey, but it feels à little bit dangerous to start follow them this late into the season.... AlreadyComment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#5470Aajh, i want to start follow both chase 110 and JW hockey, but it feels à little bit dangerous to start follow them this late into the season.... Already öppning forward to NeXT NBA season Comment -
cupcupdishRestricted User
- 03-09-11
- 31
#5471Good system and a good winComment -
JW CashSBR MVP
- 12-31-08
- 4453
#5472
....maybe you are right.........................
Like my Grandma told me when she was in the nursing home, in her last days..
She said ............. " JW, ...............scared money Never Wins "..........Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#5473Comment -
capndaveySBR Rookie
- 01-20-11
- 4
#5474Comment -
teeceeSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-18-09
- 6298
#5475heat come through, baby!! these systems just keep churning out winners. nice.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5477Lines aren't up yet for the Chase 110 plays. Don't worry, they will be posted.Comment -
GoGoonersSBR Hustler
- 01-28-11
- 58
#5479hi wallco, not sure if you've tested this before, but are buying 3 points any good on the chase 110 plays? many thanks for your great workComment -
clamchowderSBR Sharp
- 02-26-11
- 471
#5480Does anyone buy 3 pts for the JM's systems?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5482No, it definitely was not the way to play it. Especially in a four game chase. A (D) bet loss would be worse than that Miami loss could have been. Not enough victories were picked up to offset the losses with the 3 point juice. This was one of the 5 tests I did for each season. I am going to retset buying three on high favorites, to try to avoid the Miami scenario. But I do remember that many more losses occured when playing P/L on favorites, I will recheck to see how three less points would have done. I will get to that after my baseball backtests are complete.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5484Chase 110 - Plays for 3/11/11
2010-11 System to date: 68-0
System Rules can be found in post #5000
System Backtest can be found in post #5000
Portland @ Charlotte Bobcats (+4½) (A)
Atlanta Hawks (+7½) @ Chicago (A)
Indiana Pacers (+1) @ Toronto (A)Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5486
3 game loss @ -170 (3 pts) = -18.68 units
2010-11 losses buying three points = -93.4 units : 5 loses @ 18.68 units.
2010-11 losses playing (-110) = -59.8 units : 7 losses @ 8.26 units, and -2 units for two less wins.
This has been backtested by a few people and deemed to be unsuccessful over the long haul. But this season it is much further ahead, and until the loss money catches up with the buy three point loss money, I see no reason to stop. For if I get to that point, I will be even with if I had bought three all year, nothing to lose. This is for JM, not Chase 110. There is no point buying in Chase 110. Backtested results are based on a four game chase. A four game chase @ -170 would cost 52.13 units. Since every season has had losses, two losses for a year would be a losing season. Just go with the systems the way they are and you will be fine: buy 3 in JM, don't buy 3 in Chase 110.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#5487Just finished writing a program that will do some testing for me. I just have to input yearly data. Baseball is a tricky sport to backtest, since most bets are made on M/L, and constant conversions from favorite lines to dog lines are necessary. The wins and losses portion is easy, but to find the actual money results requires painstaking work. So I wrote a program to do the money calculations and the (A) (B) (C) data. I am testing six different options for two systems, hopefully the computer will tell me which version is best. Then I will apply that version to ten more seasons to check for consistency. I like the way it is going, but i absolutely will not throw anything up on these forums unless I am convinced it works, and willing to put my own $ on it.Comment -
clamchowderSBR Sharp
- 02-26-11
- 471
#5488One thing I've notice about JM's 3 pts system is that it is too much. 2 pts are good enough for the play. When the 2-pt play doesn't cover, 3-pt play doesn't cover as well. My bet is Orlando will cover the 4.5 tonite against the warriors. GS has been shooting well lately. Their past couple games went under. Thanks for posting JM's systems and your chase 110. These are profitable system if ones would stay with it. Good money management is the key, but other temptations are almost irresistible.
May the discipline be with you.Comment -
krzychu78SBR Sharp
- 01-08-10
- 291
#5489JM's NBA system:
03/09/2011 Orlando @ Sacramento - V1, A bet - LOSS
03/09/2011 Detroit @ San Antonio - V1, A bet - WIN
03/09/2011 Indiana @ Minnesota - V3, A bet - LOSS
03/09/2011 Utah @ Toronto - V2, B bet - WIN
V1record so far (finished series): 50-3
(A): 26-27
(B): 20-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 24-1
(A): 14-11
(B): 4-7
(C): 6-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 47-2
(A): 26-22-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 18-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
Next JM's plays:
03/11/2011 Orlando @ Golden State- V1, B bet
03/11/2011 Indiana @ Toronto - V3, B bet
03/12/2011 Philadelphia @ Milwaukee- V2, A bet
03/12/2011 San Antonio @ Houston- V3, A bet
03/13/2011 Oklahoma City @ Cleveland- V1, A bet
03/13/2011 Charlotte @ Toronto- V2, A bet
03/13/2011 Minnesota @ Golden State- V3, A bet
03/14/2011 Denver @ New Orleans- V1, A bet
03/16/2011 Cleveland @ Sacramento- V1, A bet
03/18/2011 Boston @ Houston- V2, A bet
03/18/2011 Golden State @ Phoenix- V3, A bet
03/19/2011 Indiana @ Memphis- V3, A betComment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#5491Next JM v1 NHL plays:
BOS [A] M/L
TPS:
SAC +15 [b]
*might be [a] because their game vs memphis
was +500 but idk if it was official play or not.
SBP original:
SAC +12 [b]
SBP updated:
BOB cats +5[A]
SBP straight bets
bulls -7
3/11
JM NBA
Indy +1.5 [b] vs TOR
ORL -1 [b] vs gSW
Chase 110:
CHAR +4.5 [A] vs POR
ATL +7 [A] vs CHI
INDY -1.5 [A] vs TOR
*note different lines then Wallco, because i am basing these off the lines closer to game time. Since the system is based off the closing lines before the game.
JW hockey
Washington under 5.5 [A] -130
Detroit home over 5.5 [C] -115
NYI home over 5.5 [A] +100Comment -
dlunc3SBR Hall of Famer
- 10-31-09
- 9129
#5492indy sucksComment -
GoGoonersSBR Hustler
- 01-28-11
- 58
#5493No, it definitely was not the way to play it. Especially in a four game chase. A (D) bet loss would be worse than that Miami loss could have been. Not enough victories were picked up to offset the losses with the 3 point juice. This was one of the 5 tests I did for each season. I am going to retset buying three on high favorites, to try to avoid the Miami scenario. But I do remember that many more losses occured when playing P/L on favorites, I will recheck to see how three less points would have done. I will get to that after my baseball backtests are complete.Comment -
GoGoonersSBR Hustler
- 01-28-11
- 58
#5494Come on magic.. Unbelievable shooting by gsw damnComment -
lawalahmedRestricted User
- 11-13-10
- 1237
#5495JM SYSTEM QUOTE:
"People always afraid to play small team in a system play (series) why they always happy to have big team but the truth is small team do better when it come to system play"....Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code