What he's pointing out is that Jordan experienced futility in the postseason. So what if it was in the first round? How does that make it better? In actuality, losing in the Finals is better because you accomplish more. You have to advance beyond the first round in order to lose in the Finals. Sounds obvious enough, but Jordan jockers consistently overlook this fact in an effort to belittle Lebron.
Put it this way... if Lebron had two rings in only two attempts (no losses in the Finals) would you hold him in higher regard than you currently do, even though he would have accomplished less than he currently has?
Put it this way... if Lebron had two rings in only two attempts (no losses in the Finals) would you hold him in higher regard than you currently do, even though he would have accomplished less than he currently has?