Unfukkingreal that under didn't hit.
T-Wizz 2014 NBA Playoffs
Collapse
X
-
ChiLLxSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-24-11
- 5412
#1191Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1192It's not always that easy though. Blindly betting dogs and zig-zags worked first round but don't think that will work the rest of the way. This stuff isn't as easy as that.Originally posted by EbumdudeZig zig theory in full swing this year. With the exception of the Bobcats....well, because they suck.
Thanks man.Originally posted by SetoGood stuff. Easy as you said it would be.
Disgusting beat on the first half yeah.
Comment -
NBA ManiacSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-11-12
- 5290
#1193t-wizzle congratz
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1194Thanks maniac.Originally posted by NBA Maniact-wizzle congratz
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1196Originally posted by t-wizzleTrail Blazers +7 -107 (4x); ML +275 (.5x)
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x); ML +185 (.5x)
The Blazers are legit. Their athleticism will make this a really tough series for San Antonio. Will Portland continue to shoot well from 3? Will Aldridge be in Iso's with Duncan? Lillard is going to really make Parker have to work on both ends. This is my favorite series of the 4. Really looking forward to watching these two.
Adding:
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x); ML +260 (1x)
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110; .5x to Blazers 1H ML +185Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1197Originally posted by t-wizzleAdding:
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x); ML +260 (1x)
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110; .5x to Blazers 1H ML +185
Got too crazy on this. Tons of late money on Blazers.
I'm not 100% convinced Portland doesn't at least make this somewhat interesting.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1198Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x)Comment -
eddycashSBR MVP
- 11-06-13
- 4540
#1199I hope ur not on my picks today.Comment -
V4ValueSBR Sharp
- 09-01-13
- 368
#1200Originally posted by eddycashI hope ur not on my picks today.
Thanks for your heads up, you got the attention wanted.
Comment -
eddycashSBR MVP
- 11-06-13
- 4540
#1201Who DA f are u?Comment -
GoBlue77SBR Hall of Famer- 03-20-11
- 9166
#1202Originally posted by eddycashI hope ur not on my picks today.
Comment -
eddycashSBR MVP
- 11-06-13
- 4540
#1203If I wanted attention, I'd start my own thread, I'm just here to talk sh!tComment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1204Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); ML +205 (2x)Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1205Wizards +4.5 -107 (2.5x); ML +165 (.5x)Comment -
The HorseSBR Hustler
- 09-28-08
- 62
#1206penetrate meComment -
PauulzcappinSBR Posting Legend
- 04-23-10
- 20295
#1207lol.Originally posted by The Horsepenetrate me
anyway line movement looks good for the clippersComment -
Tommy KarateSBR Posting Legend
- 10-12-13
- 13445
#1208instinct play on the clips or some angle you have?Comment -
GoBlue77SBR Hall of Famer- 03-20-11
- 9166
#1209YESSS!!! glad you're on those!!!!Comment -
mackaveSBR MVP
- 03-22-14
- 4979
#1210hmmmmmm, wanna play the okc/clips game huge still looking into it.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1211Pacers Live -1.5 +105 (1x)
Wizards TT Under 89 -115 (.25x)Comment -
Donkeys2012SBR MVP
- 01-11-12
- 2771
#1212Originally posted by t-wizzlePacers Live -1.5 +105 (1x)
Wizards TT Under 89 -115 (.25x)
So now Wizzle who is in the midst of a -100 Unit week and a half is trying to catch a middle
Comment -
mackaveSBR MVP
- 03-22-14
- 4979
#1213lolComment -
KRITSBR Posting Legend
- 01-11-14
- 12884
#1214Tryin to get that middle I see....gl.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1215Pacers are going to cover the 4.5 unfortunately for me.Originally posted by KRITTryin to get that middle I see....gl.Comment -
KRITSBR Posting Legend
- 01-11-14
- 12884
#1216Yeah....I think we're screwed here. Just got a feeling. I got Wiz +4.5 too.Originally posted by t-wizzlePacers are going to cover the 4.5 unfortunately for me.Comment -
KRITSBR Posting Legend
- 01-11-14
- 12884
#1217Haha BealOriginally posted by KRITYeah....I think we're screwed here. Just got a feeling. I got Wiz +4.5 too.
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1218Pacers are still going to win by 5.Originally posted by KRITHaha Beal
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1219Originally posted by t-wizzleWizards +4.5 -107 (2.5x); ML +165 (.5x)Originally posted by t-wizzlePacers Live -1.5 +105 (1x)
Wizards TT Under 89 -115 (.25x)
Pacers were the right side tonight. Glad I recognized that and hit the middle.
This sounds ridiculous but I really believe I caught a break. Yes - I realize Wizards covered that ENTIRE game - but Pacers were the sharp play. They were never going to lose this game.Comment -
Donkeys2012SBR MVP
- 01-11-12
- 2771
#1220This guy is Unreal he wins 3 Units and pats himself on the back when he got lucky as hell they didnt lose by 5.Originally posted by t-wizzlePacers were the right side tonight. Glad I recognized that and hit the middle.
This sounds ridiculous but I really believe I caught a break. Yes - I realize Wizards covered that ENTIRE game - but Pacers were the sharp play. They were never going to lose this game.
Then bumps his thread for a 3 unit win when he is down over 100 Units in the last week.
Cant make this shit up.
Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1221Late money all over the Clippers. Only thing that concerns me is a crazy hot OKC start. First half line movement indicates this could happen.Originally posted by t-wizzleClippers +5.5 -108 (12x); ML +205 (2x)
TK getting back to you.... I just think the Clippers are a better team. Their size makes them a more viable contender. The Thunder force awful jumpshots. Sometimes they get away with it because Durant and Westbrook are so talented and can get hot but their offense is too inconsistent. They don't have an inside presence. If Durant would just post up (LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING FOR THE PAST 4 YEARS NOW), it would do wonders for them. They could run through him in the post and it would free up other shooters for OPEN shots. It doesn't even matter that he's not strong. He's tall enough where he could do Dirk/Aldridge moves and just shoot over the defender and quick enough to get a stop and drive. Eventually that style of game could wear him out but they could pick their spots and use it effectively.Comment -
SetoSBR Posting Legend
- 12-16-11
- 12906
#1222I'll admit I don't really follow here. Having watched that game it could have really gone either way? I still find it hard to credit Indiana for this win. One thing I can say about them is they guarded the 3 A LOT better, not surprised Wiz shot 5-21, even though bad shot selection had to do with it too. But still, Wizards lost this game from a very favourable position more than anything imo. They need to play better offensively at home than they did in these 1st 2 games - and I do realise they scored a lot in game 1 but those droughts they go on keep allowing the Pacers to hang around and when you allow a team to hang around bad things happen to you. Now obviously you could probably reverse this from an Indiana standpoint but I really see it that way.Originally posted by t-wizzlePacers were the right side tonight. Glad I recognized that and hit the middle.
This sounds ridiculous but I really believe I caught a break. Yes - I realize Wizards covered that ENTIRE game - but Pacers were the sharp play. They were never going to lose this game.
Oh and how can you go 5-12 from the line in an NBA game? 42 percent lmao. Pathetic.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1223Originally posted by SetoI'll admit I don't really follow here. Having watched that game it could have really gone either way? I still find it hard to credit Indiana for this win. One thing I can say about them is they guarded the 3 A LOT better, not surprised Wiz shot 5-21, even though bad shot selection had to do with it too. But still, Wizards lost this game from a very favourable position more than anything imo. They need to play better offensively at home than they did in these 1st 2 games - and I do realise they scored a lot in game 1 but those droughts they go on keep allowing the Pacers to hang around and when you allow a team to hang around bad things happen to you. Now obviously you could probably reverse this from an Indiana standpoint but I really see it that way.
Oh and how can you go 5-12 from the line in an NBA game? 42 percent lmao. Pathetic.
I partially base that on line movement. My interpretation of that line (even before the late money) is that Indiana was no doubt winning this game. I regretted my small Wiz ML bet but just let it ride. I can't really give you much of a breakdown here - all I can say is that the line movement over the course of the day, along with the late money told me that Indy was going to make a run late.
If you want to get into a breakdown, I think you could see the pace of the game changed. Washington wasn't able to get out in transition. It became a slow game and Washington not only had a tough time getting to the rim, but they were shooting contested shots.
The Pacers play a playoff brand of basketball. Their offense still sucks but if Hibbert plays the way he did today it will open up corner 3s for George Hill and eventually George and Stephenson will be able to get into a rhythm.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#1224Phantom call on CP3 to give him his second foul.
Comment -
SetoSBR Posting Legend
- 12-16-11
- 12906
#1225Yea I see what you mean - but still up 3 with 4 minutes to go against one of the worst offensive teams in the league you had to at least think the Wizards had a shot at that game. But I understand the explanation.Originally posted by t-wizzleI partially base that on line movement. My interpretation of that line (even before the late money) is that Indiana was no doubt winning this game. I regretted my small Wiz ML bet but just let it ride. I can't really give you much of a breakdown here - all I can say is that the line movement over the course of the day, along with the late money told me that Indy was going to make a run late.
If you want to get into a breakdown, I think you could see the pace of the game changed. Washington wasn't able to get out in transition. It became a slow game and Washington not only had a tough time getting to the rim, but they were shooting contested shots.
The Pacers play a playoff brand of basketball. Their offense still sucks but if Hibbert plays the way he did today it will open up corner 3s for George Hill and eventually George and Stephenson will be able to get into a rhythm.
Wizards didn't get that much in transition in game 1 either but tonight was an all-time low (1 fast break point
)
Gotta think they can play better in DC especially on offense. I expect John Wall to bounce back. Time will tell but I think in 4 days time we're talking about Indiana trying to fight off elimination in game 5. Which they most likely will, I think Wizards win this in 6 now. If they can at least win 3 games in the series I'll break even on my series bets, but I'm not even thinking about that now I want to win lol. I'll start having that mindset if they lose game 3.
Who bounces back tomorrow? I think both the Nets and Blazers should put on a better showing and hang around but I'm not really convinced either covers at this point.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
