Nhl rlm

[doublej95]

ok here is what I'm playing as of right now

Phoenix +155
Edmonton +135
Florida +135
Toronto + 145

I'm really hoping for at least 2-2 on these games, I really think that's the best it will be.

[gangeriver]

dallas -119 / +118 on matchbook it went suddenly!

[Ras1112]

Ok here is what I'm seeing for tonight on RLM on the moneyline

Maple Leafs
Phoenix
Edmonton
Florida
Dallas? not sure yet

Another game of note with some Value is on the Blues, the public has moved to St. Louis the line at pinny for St. Louis has went from +109 to -109 at a lot of the other books you can still get St. Louis at +money.

With u on first 3, although don't see Phoenix winning but have to follow RLM
Not sold on Florida & Dallas and St.Louis as u said total mess will pass on it!
GL!

[doublej95]

dallas -119 / +118 on matchbook it went suddenly!

I'm totally confused on the Dallas game I see RLM at all of the other books but not at pinny. I use pinny as my guide so I'm just going to not over think this game and avoid it, got enough action as is.

[doublej95]

1-3 on the night but not a disaster, Edmonton let us down in the shoot out could have easily been 2-2 on the night.

Was looking through my plays this season (started 10-21) in NHL and I'm 7-7 +.8 units using RLM a very interesting thing I found was that I am 1-6 on the RLM with plays that involve Jim Morrison's NHL system. 5 of the plays was system plays and the other two opposite his play. My plays the involve RLM and have no Morrison effect are 6-1 +5.25 units. This is something I will be thinking about when it comes to making RLM plays, staying away from games that are related to his system.

[DaProfessor23]

thats weird but understandable , morrison is like the anti-christ when it comes to making money . lol , im joking but is that the only factor between all the losing games? it could possibly be something else more meaningful .

[RLM_Tracker]

What does the Morrison system involve? Not familiar with it.

[Wini]

Has anyone here started to get a feel for some "rules" regarding NHL RLM? I know that pack has a set of rules for NCAAF RLM, with a certain % required on each side, at least a full point moving on the line, etc.

So far I have been tracking all NHL RLM (not necessarily playing them all), and it seems a bit random to me so far.

[Ras1112]

Whatever it was, didn't work today. One thing I'll look into, is when to bet, for me early picks work better. It's not like we will figure all of them all the time, all we need most of the them most of the time
BOL

[doublej95]

thats weird but understandable , morrison is like the anti-christ when it comes to making money . lol , im joking but is that the only factor between all the losing games? it could possibly be something else more meaningful .

Thats all I have looked at, thats meaning enough for me. Nah I'm just going to take note of it and track it some more. Morrison's Hockey system is not that good if you didnt know.

[RLM_Tracker]

Has anyone here started to get a feel for some "rules" regarding NHL RLM? I know that pack has a set of rules for NCAAF RLM, with a certain % required on each side, at least a full point moving on the line, etc.

So far I have been tracking all NHL RLM (not necessarily playing them all), and it seems a bit random to me so far.

For my plays, I have been doing .5 units if a line moves ten points and has 60-69% on the other side, 1 unit if 10+ points and 70% or more on the other side.

[doublej95]

Has anyone here started to get a feel for some "rules" regarding NHL RLM? I know that pack has a set of rules for NCAAF RLM, with a certain % required on each side, at least a full point moving on the line, etc.

So far I have been tracking all NHL RLM (not necessarily playing them all), and it seems a bit random to me so far.

I have been trying to go with the biggest RLM around 10 cent's in movement. Any suggestions and ideas feel free to post. I'm going to look at the Morrison thing a little more myself in my tracking. I will note if a game that has RLM is also a Morrison system play.

[doublej95]

Whatever it was, didn't work today. One thing I'll look into, is when to bet, for me early picks work better. It's not like we will figure all of them all the time, all we need most of the them most of the time
BOL

going with the RLM in hockey will give you alot more underdogs than favorites which means you can be around .500 and still be plus money. even with a 1-3 night for me I only lost 1.45 units. Not happy about it but all favorites on a 1-3 night would have been around -3 or-4 units.

[Ras1112]

going with the RLM in hockey will give you alot more underdogs than favorites which means you can be around .500 and still be plus money. even with a 1-3 night for me I only lost 1.45 units. Not happy about it but all favorites on a 1-3 night would have been around -3 or-4 units.

Yes, u right, as long as we learn something money isn't lost. I didn't lose anything today actually (had 2 units on Magic) just don't feel like today I know better how to deal with NHL RLM tomorrow

[BetterBizness]

Nice Thread DJ.. I always check to see the plays and it helps "tweak" the value of a play I may already like.. today that play was Phoenix....

[doublej95]

Nice Thread DJ.. I always check to see the plays and it helps "tweak" the value of a play I may already like.. today that play was Phoenix....

Glad you hit that nice underdog tonight.

[mister bee]

If you read my post I state that Tampa was not RLM, I was playing it on another trend I use: home dog with a higher RPI than the favorite. Someone just wanted to know all my plays for the night so I posted them. A very nice 4-1 night.

doublej, love the RLM. just starting to use it in my capping arsenal. quick question: where are you finding hockey RPI stats?

[doublej95]

doublej, love the RLM. just starting to use it in my capping arsenal. quick question: where are you finding hockey RPI stats?

ESPN, just Google NHL RPI

[DaProfessor23]

doublej , have you looked into RLM on hockey totals? i see a few today . i think ill just post them and see how it turns out .

[SOXROCK]

how do you find the RLM on totals. What site do you use???

thanks

[mister bee]

ESPN, just Google NHL RPI

Awesome. Thanks bro.

[doublej95]

doublej , have you looked into RLM on hockey totals? i see a few today . i think ill just post them and see how it turns out .

Yeah post them and lets see how they do

[packbacker79]

I have been looking over the last few weeks and trying to identify some "rules" that will help us narrow these picks down. Once Rule that seems to hold true is that if we look for games that have at least a 20pt line move for example -120 down to -100 the odds improve significantly for ML plays.

I am going back over the games now but its something like 12-2 if you only play games using that rule. Even if the % of bets placed on the other side is low..for example 55/45. And when you see the line switch sides...i.e. -120 to +103 the odds improve significantly.

[gangeriver]

I took same picks yesterday and I added kings and colorado. went 3-3
it seems we have 2 plays tonight. Flyers and Oilers. I'm wrong?

[Ras1112]

Will make some early picks it's Friday after all
Philly, Oilers and Canes(just personal favorites)
So, gangeriver I'm with u!
GL!

[doublej95]

I took same picks yesterday and I added kings and colorado. went 3-3
it seems we have 2 plays tonight. Flyers and Oilers. I'm wrong?

Yes, Flyers and Oliers would be plays.

[gangeriver]

I want to share this. These are dropped dogs odds. some of them RLM some of them not. since 7/10.
first % belongs to dog, second is fav. Lines from Pinnacle (closing lines) consensus from covers.com. I admit, using covers.com consensus is a bit of strange but I don't trust pregame.Who/Where is their numbers source?
not included under +100 dogs and small (like 5-6 cents) line movings.

07/10

carolina-minnesota %37,5-%62,5 (covers) WON +104

08/10

columbus- san jose %21-%79 (covers) LOST +154

dallas - new jersey %22-%78 (covers) WON +161

buffalo -ottawa %49,5-%50,5 (covers) WON +103

09/10

San jose-colombus %69-%31 (covers) WON +140

montreal - pitts. %27-%73 (covers) WON +178

new jersey - wash. %31-%69 (covers) LOST +131

atlanta- tampa bay %29-%71 (covers) LOST +133

detroit - chicago %46-%54 (covers) WON +139

LA kings-vancouver %30-%70 (covers) WON +135

10/10

floriada-edmonton %24-%76 (covers) LOST +123

11/10

islanders - rangers %29-%71 (covers) WON +126

pittsburgh-new jersey %61-%39 (covers) WON +115 *****

12/10

atlanta - la kings %35-65 (covers) LOST +162

13/10

tampa bay - montreal %45-%54 (covers) WON +106

toronto-pitssburg %34-%66 (covers) WON +145

nashville - chicago %32-%68 (covers) WON +161

14/10

carolina -ottawa %38-%62 (covers) LOST +121

detroit - dallas %42-%57 (covers) WON +101

florida - calgary %26-%74 (covers) WON +127

15/10

colorado-n.jersey %42-%58 (covers) WON +133

atlanta - anaheim %38-%62 (covers) WON +115

16/10

stlouis - dallas %41-%59 (covers) LOST +103

17/10

phoenix - anaheim %47-%53 (covers) LOST +123

carolina-vancouver %31-%69 (covers) LOST +149

18/10

islanders-toronto %34-%66 (covers) WON +155

ST louis-chicago %32-%68 (covers) LOST +125

19/10

boston - washington %38-%62 (covers) WON +145

calgary - nashville %37-%63 (covers) WON +124

carolina - san jose %24-%76 (covers) WON +181

21/10

calgary - detroit %33-%67 (covers) LOST +170

23/10

montreal - ottawa %59-%41 (covers) WON +105 *****

nashville -dallas %43-57 (covers) WON +118

carolina - phoenix %40-%60 (covers) WON +113

24/10

san jose - calgary %43-%57 (covers) WON +100

25/10

phoenix-montreal %37-%63 (covers) LOST +120

27/10

Atlanta-ny rangers %39-%61 (covers) WON +117

Capitals-Carolina %40-%60 (covers) LOST +118

LA kings - chıcago %34-%66 (covers) LOST +126

(25-14)

28/10

emonton - clombus %43-%57 (covers) Lost +143

florida - ottawa %39-%61 (covers) LOST +136

Phoenix - detroit %31-%69 (covers) WON +156

toronto -boston %39-%61 (covers) LOST +150

la kings - dallas %46-54 (covers) WON +103

colorado -calgary %45-%55 (covers) WON +124

(28-17)07/10

carolina-minnesota %37,5-%62,5 (covers) WON +104

08/10

columbus- san jose %21-%79 (covers) LOST +154

dallas - new jersey %22-%78 (covers) WON +161

buffalo -ottawa %49,5-%50,5 (covers) WON +103

09/10

San jose-colombus %69-%31 (covers) WON +140

montreal - pitts. %27-%73 (covers) WON +178

new jersey - wash. %31-%69 (covers) LOST +131

atlanta- tampa bay %29-%71 (covers) LOST +133

detroit - chicago %46-%54 (covers) WON +139

LA kings-vancouver %30-%70 (covers) WON +135

10/10

floriada-edmonton %24-%76 (covers) LOST +123

11/10

islanders - rangers %29-%71 (covers) WON +126

pittsburgh-new jersey %61-%39 (covers) WON +115 *****

12/10

atlanta - la kings %35-65 (covers) LOST +162

13/10

tampa bay - montreal %45-%54 (covers) WON +106

toronto-pitssburg %34-%66 (covers) WON +145

nashville - chicago %32-%68 (covers) WON +161

14/10

carolina -ottawa %38-%62 (covers) LOST +121

detroit - dallas %42-%57 (covers) WON +101

florida - calgary %26-%74 (covers) WON +127

15/10

colorado-n.jersey %42-%58 (covers) WON +133

atlanta - anaheim %38-%62 (covers) WON +115

16/10

stlouis - dallas %41-%59 (covers) LOST +103

17/10

phoenix - anaheim %47-%53 (covers) LOST +123

carolina-vancouver %31-%69 (covers) LOST +149

18/10

islanders-toronto %34-%66 (covers) WON +155

ST louis-chicago %32-%68 (covers) LOST +125

19/10

boston - washington %38-%62 (covers) WON +145

calgary - nashville %37-%63 (covers) WON +124

carolina - san jose %24-%76 (covers) WON +181

21/10

calgary - detroit %33-%67 (covers) LOST +170

23/10

montreal - ottawa %59-%41 (covers) WON +105 *****

nashville -dallas %43-57 (covers) WON +118

carolina - phoenix %40-%60 (covers) WON +113

24/10

san jose - calgary %43-%57 (covers) WON +100

25/10

phoenix-montreal %37-%63 (covers) LOST +120

27/10

Atlanta-ny rangers %39-%61 (covers) WON +117

Capitals-Carolina %40-%60 (covers) LOST +118

LA kings - chıcago %34-%66 (covers) LOST +126

(25-14)

28/10

emonton - clombus %43-%57 (covers) Lost +143

florida - ottawa %39-%61 (covers) LOST +136

Phoenix - detroit %31-%69 (covers) WON +156

toronto -boston %39-%61 (covers) LOST +150

la kings - dallas %46-54 (covers) WON +103

colorado -calgary %45-%55 (covers) WON +124

(28-17)07/10

carolina-minnesota %37,5-%62,5 (covers) WON +104

08/10

columbus- san jose %21-%79 (covers) LOST +154

dallas - new jersey %22-%78 (covers) WON +161

buffalo -ottawa %49,5-%50,5 (covers) WON +103

09/10

San jose-colombus %69-%31 (covers) WON +140

montreal - pitts. %27-%73 (covers) WON +178

new jersey - wash. %31-%69 (covers) LOST +131

atlanta- tampa bay %29-%71 (covers) LOST +133

detroit - chicago %46-%54 (covers) WON +139

LA kings-vancouver %30-%70 (covers) WON +135

10/10

floriada-edmonton %24-%76 (covers) LOST +123

11/10

islanders - rangers %29-%71 (covers) WON +126

pittsburgh-new jersey %61-%39 (covers) WON +115 *****

12/10

atlanta - la kings %35-65 (covers) LOST +162

13/10

tampa bay - montreal %45-%54 (covers) WON +106

toronto-pitssburg %34-%66 (covers) WON +145

nashville - chicago %32-%68 (covers) WON +161

14/10

carolina -ottawa %38-%62 (covers) LOST +121

detroit - dallas %42-%57 (covers) WON +101

florida - calgary %26-%74 (covers) WON +127

15/10

colorado-n.jersey %42-%58 (covers) WON +133

atlanta - anaheim %38-%62 (covers) WON +115

16/10

stlouis - dallas %41-%59 (covers) LOST +103

17/10

phoenix - anaheim %47-%53 (covers) LOST +123

carolina-vancouver %31-%69 (covers) LOST +149

18/10

islanders-toronto %34-%66 (covers) WON +155

ST louis-chicago %32-%68 (covers) LOST +125

19/10

boston - washington %38-%62 (covers) WON +145

calgary - nashville %37-%63 (covers) WON +124

carolina - san jose %24-%76 (covers) WON +181

21/10

calgary - detroit %33-%67 (covers) LOST +170

23/10

montreal - ottawa %59-%41 (covers) WON +105 *****

nashville -dallas %43-57 (covers) WON +118

carolina - phoenix %40-%60 (covers) WON +113

24/10

san jose - calgary %43-%57 (covers) WON +100

25/10

phoenix-montreal %37-%63 (covers) LOST +120

27/10

Atlanta-ny rangers %39-%61 (covers) WON +117

Capitals-Carolina %40-%60 (covers) LOST +118

LA kings - chıcago %34-%66 (covers) LOST +126

(25-14)

28/10

emonton - clombus %43-%57 (covers) Lost +143

florida - ottawa %39-%61 (covers) LOST +136

Phoenix - detroit %31-%69 (covers) WON +156

toronto -boston %39-%61 (covers) LOST +150

la kings - dallas %46-54 (covers) WON +103

colorado -calgary %45-%55 (covers) WON +124

(28-17)


-gangeriver-

[packbacker79]

So when I look at the last couple weeks and I just look at games with at least a 20pt RLM the ML plays would be 11-1 and the Puck Line plays would be 11-1.

Lets try and narrow things down with this new rule for tonight...as of now the plays look like:

Philly
Atlanta
Edmonton

[doublej95]

How would Atlanta be RLM, at sports insights it is showing 54% on Atlanta ML.

[packbacker79]

Buffalo opened at -109 and they are now at +101 with 67% on Buffalo.

[doublej95]

yeah 67% on the puck line, do you use the puck line % to determine the money line also? moneyline is 46 Buffalo, 54 Atlanta

[packbacker79]

Yeah..I use Puck line %

[Vinnybagadonuts]

Are you betting on the PL or the ML?

For example, are you suggesting taking the Flyers to win, or +1.5? I'm just trying to get a handle on the system.

Thanks.

[jsund]

packbacker---on the atlanta game the difference is only 10 , NOT THE 20 THAT YOU SUGGESTED--OR AM I MISSING SOMETHING? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I DO THIS RIGHT--THANKS GUY

[ZicariBT08]

Yeah..I use Puck line %

I've been getting into this RLM tracking recently and this is the part that I'm still unsure/confused about, at least for hockey.

Are you looking at the puck line percents? ML? Both? Do they determine whether your playing the PL or the ML?


EDIT: Vinny beat me to it.