Nhl rlm

[doublej95]

What about late night NFL? any RLM there?

not as of right now.

[SOXROCK]

the site that I use had over 9900 wagers on the Tampa bay game with 61% on Tampa bay with an opening line of -154 and a closing line of -150. would that be considered RLM with a play on Nashville?? Need help

thanks

[doublej95]

For myself .04 on a money line is not much movement, I like to look for. 10 at least. But if you play it good luck

[SOXROCK]

thanks for the tip

[packbacker79]

Hey guys...sorry I have been MIA. Full weekend. Below are the games that had RLM Fri, Sat, and Sunday.

10-23-10

Florida -1.5 L (ML Win)(Line went from -120 to -139 with 53% on NY)
Montreal +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +120 to +105 with 59% on Ottowa)
St Louis +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +106 to -129 with 69% on Pittsburgh)
Columbus +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +186 to +182 with 94% on Chicago)
Carolina +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +134 to +113 with 66% on Phoenix)

Puck Line 8-3/ Season 15-3
Money Line 9-2/ Season 15-3

10-24-10

Nashville +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +142 to +138 with 56% on Tampa Bay)
New York -1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from -104 to -107 with 63% on New Jersey)
San Jose +1.5 L (Line went from +105 to -106 with 53% on Calgary)

Puck Line Season 17-4 (80%)
Money Line Season 17-4

[packbacker79]

Potential games for tonight:

Columbus

[incomeraise]

quick question, i the 23rd u have st louis on the PL for +1.5..but if the Ml went to -129, shouldnt the Pl be -1.5 instead of +1.5? just trying to get it? because i actually played st Louis and unfortunately i lost

[doublej95]

Phoneix is looking like a play on the moneyline. I have noticed that there is always a lot of late movement closer to game time in the Hockey games.

[TakeIt]

Hey guys...sorry I have been MIA. Full weekend. Below are the games that had RLM Fri, Sat, and Sunday.

10-23-10

Florida -1.5 L (ML Win)(Line went from -120 to -139 with 53% on NY)
Montreal +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +120 to +105 with 59% on Ottowa)
St Louis +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +106 to -129 with 69% on Pittsburgh)
Columbus +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +186 to +182 with 94% on Chicago)
Carolina +1.5 W (ML Win)(Line went from +134 to +113 with 66% on Phoenix)

now i have no clue what you're doing.

either you've changed the rules completely or something is out of whack (maybe me) .if a team (like NY) has the most number of bets (53%) and the line goes against them (-120 to -139) how is that RLM? Isn't that what you would expect the line to do? in other words, in order for it to be RLM the line has to move in the opposite direction that logic would dictate.

i thought the line had to move the other way for it to be RLM, such as it was in the following games you posted at the beginning of the thread.

Bruins +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Capitals -182 to -157 w. 65% on Capitals)
Flames +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Predators -156 to -134 w. 57% on Predators)
Hurricanes +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Sharks -203 to -193 w. 76% on Sharks

the line movement and plays of these games completely contradict the line movement and plays of the games at the top of the page.

if a team has 65% of the bets (capitals) and the line goes from -182 to -157 that's RLM because the line moved in the opposite direction from what you would expect. you would expect the line to go against the team with the most number of bets--not in their favor. you would expect the line to get worse--not better.

in every example at the top of the page, all of the lines got worse--not better. exactly as you would expect them to do. hence, they are not RLM.

what am i missing here?

[doublej95]

I'm playing Columbus and Phoneix tonight

[dvb02]

now i have no clue what you're doing. either you've changed the rules completely or something is out of whack (maybe me) .if a team (like NY) has the most number of bets (53%) and the line goes against them (-120 to -139) how is that RLM? Isn't that what you would expect the line to do? in other words, in order for it to be RLM the line has to move in the opposite direction that logic would dictate. i thought the line had to move the other way for it to be RLM, such as it was in the following games you posted at the beginning of the thread. Bruins +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Capitals -182 to -157 w. 65% on Capitals) Flames +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Predators -156 to -134 w. 57% on Predators) Hurricanes +1.5 W (ML win)(Line went from Sharks -203 to -193 w. 76% on Sharks the line movement and plays of these games completely contradict the line movement and plays of the games at the top of the page. if a team has 65% of the bets (capitals) and the line goes from -182 to -157 that's RLM because the line moved in the opposite direction from what you would expect. you would expect the line to go against the team with the most number of bets--not in their favor. you would expect the line to get worse--not better. in every example at the top of the page, all of the lines got worse--not better. exactly as you would expect them to do. hence, they are not RLM. what am i missing here?

TakeIT, I think he means that the Florida line went from -120 to -139 even though the majority of the bets were on NY.

[Gtownguy487]

I'm playing Columbus and Phoneix tonight

ML or Side?

[doublej95]

ML or Side?

Moneyline

[Gtownguy487]

Moneyline

how much do u bet a game usually in NHL?

[doublej95]

how much do u bet a game usually in NHL?

I bet 2% of my bankroll on my plays.

[jsund]

question--what does rlm stand for--recent line movement or reverse lie movement? sorry if it seems as a dumb question

[doublej95]

question--what does rlm stand for--recent line movement or reverse lie movement? sorry if it seems as a dumb question

reverse line movement

[DaProfessor23]

I'm playing Columbus and Phoneix tonight

so am i . i took both ML , and parlay'd +1.5 on those two teams. lets hope for a good night!

[jsund]

packbacker--what plays do you have for to-nite

[jsund]

packbacker--do you have any plays for tonite?

[jsund]

oops--- sorry for the double post--my bad

[bluelabga]

Packbacker or doublej95?? How do you know when to bet just the money line or just the puck line or when do you bet both???

[doublej95]

Columbus

[doublej95]

Edmonton and Vancouver are looking like early leans on the moneyline. Will wait closer to game time and see if the RLM holds up.

[EricZ116]

Packbacker or doublej95?? How do you know when to bet just the money line or just the puck line or when do you bet both???

I had this same question =/

[doublej95]

I have only been playing the moneyline, I don't mess with the puckline cause of the high juice, but that's just me.

[EricZ116]

And you bet all ML regardless of juice, right?

[doublej95]

And you bet all ML regardless of juice, right?

So far the juice on the moneyline has been reasonable. If it is very high I will pass if I don't like the game.

[Gtownguy487]

van's money line is kinda high.. no?

double let me know when u put ur bets in

[Gtownguy487]

Where is pack?

[doublej95]

van's money line is kinda high.. no?

double let me know when u put ur bets in

I will post any plays that involved RLM closer to game time. These hockey lines move alot during the day so I'm waiting closer to game time.

[doublej95]

Edmonton and Vancouver are not leans anymore for me, no more rlm on those two games money has flopped it the other way.

[Gtownguy487]

Dang i was wanting to have atleast 1 game tonight

[Mr. Yo]

Maybe there will be a line swing before the games start still. There's still hope

[Gtownguy487]

On a lot of the other Sports Forums they are saying take the over in the van/colo game at 5.5 however my bookie has it at 6 so im iffy