Are YOU dumb? Proving that the books aren't hurt by our bets and that the people who tail them aren't hurt either, proves that any conflict of interest angle you want to try and use is a non issue. In other words, it's more proof that you grasping at straws with this nonsense is laughable.
Because the books move the lines based on sharp action. We bet the lines shortly after we release them, then the books move the lines because they know we're sharp and respect our opinions enough to move the lines.
Even if we didn't give the bets out, the lines would still move. We don't give out every bet we make, yet after we bet the ones we kept secret, they still move the lines a good amount.
Good job embarrasisng yourself more. You claim to know everything about gambling and how the books work yet don't even know the books move lines based on sharp action. Add on that how you think the oddsmakers set lines based on exactly how they think he line should be. You seem pretty clueless about how books operate.
Because the books move the lines based on sharp action. We bet the lines shortly after we release them, then the books move the lines because they know we're sharp and respect our opinions enough to move the lines.
Even if we didn't give the bets out, the lines would still move. We don't give out every bet we make, yet after we bet the ones we kept secret, they still move the lines a good amount.
Good job embarrasisng yourself more. You claim to know everything about gambling and how the books work yet don't even know the books move lines based on sharp action. Add on that how you think the oddsmakers set lines based on exactly how they think he line should be. You seem pretty clueless about how books operate.