you can keep repeating this but that won't make it true
no the books are just smarter than you plain and simple. they see what you don't. In weaver's last start he was at home against the twins who had swarzak starting, his 2nd start all year...and pinnacle opened the line at -140.
pinnacle thinks the angels have a better chance vs yankees with nova than vs the twins with a pitcher with 1 previous start this year(gave up 5 earned) and who in 11 career starts all last year had an ERA over 5........now what do you make of that? these are a week apart. me? i have no ******* clue
edit: btw yanks are the play here regardless of what it looks like
but Nova/Garcia/Hughes/ anywhere near -175 on planet Earth is an inflated number.
pinnacle thinks the angels have a better chance vs yankees with nova than vs the twins with a pitcher with 1 previous start this year(gave up 5 earned) and who in 11 career starts all last year had an ERA over 5........now what do you make of that? these are a week apart. me? i have no ******* clue
edit: btw yanks are the play here regardless of what it looks like