John Morrison 2011 MLB

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1)
(A) 8-4
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 2-1
V3 system 2-1
Unofficial series 8-0

Next Plays
Official
(7/01/2011) Cincinnati (.501) v Cleveland (.510) M/L (A) (7/02 (B) & 7/03 (C) if necc.)
(7/01/2011) San Diego (.484)@ Seattle (.496) R/L (A) (7/02 (B) & 7/03 (C) if necc.)

*Unofficial*
(7/01/2011) Minnesota (.480)v Milwaukee (.508) R/L (A) (Possible V3 play if MIN wins 1st gm.)

Notes: Have not received an email from Morrison yet but this is how it should play out. Both official series are borderline on qualification of the rpi, meaning they could drop out of range after a loss or two. That being said both official plays look good to get at least a win based on pitching match ups. I know one of the plays is run line but a lot of you play money line only on the dog. Just gotta mention there are no future plays from the 2 sweeps yesterday. If someone gets an email from Morrison on these plays please put it up in case I'm away from the computer. Also a special thanks to adidas for posting the "champselections". I see Morrison's "new" selections are no different from his old selections.
GL all today.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 117-9
System profit/loss: +4.84 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -15.43 units (102-9) (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-7.00 units)


(6/30/11) Chicago White Sox (-1½) (C) –Win
(6/30/11) Milwaukee (M/L) (C) – Loss


(A) 62-65
(B) 29-36
(C) 16-20
(D) 10-9


Games for (6/30/11):
Milwaukee @ Minnesota (M/L) (D) (8:10 pm EDT)
Baltimore @ Atlanta (M/L) (A) (Skip) *Official*(7:10 pm EDT)
Baltimore @ Atlanta (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
Baltimore (M/L) @ Atlanta (A) (Skip) *Official*(7:10 pm EDT)
Pittsburgh @ Washington (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Pittsburgh @ Washington (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
N.Y. Yankees @ N.Y. Mets (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
San Diego (M/L) @ Seattle (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)


*NOTE: The M/L plays for Baltimore/Atlanta game are listed only to be tracked for potential (B) bets, it is recommended that you skip these bets, and pick them up on the (B) play (for normal (B) bet amount), this amount will be listed tomorrow .Both teams qualified as system plays under different sets of criteria. Both of these bets are official for today and will count towards system wins/losses, however, if bet properly, we will attain the same profit, possibly more, then if we had bet these from the (A), even though we will only be placing a wager on one of the teams. Also, if one of these series happens to lose, our losses will be less. Both of these bets are official at the time of this post. If you wish to bet all games as they are listed, that is your option. This is only a suggestion to help maximize profit. So far we are 3/3 with this method.


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[DANO74]

Hey hagball, are any of the plays V1?

[Wallco99]

Hey hagball, are any of the plays V1?

I believe they are always v1 to start with, provided they are official. Based on the outcome of game 1, is where the v2 and v3 come from. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

[hagball52]

I believe they are always v1 to start with.

Wallco is correct. Morning Bud.

Even the unofficial is technically v1 until it becomes v3.

[GGPLAYER]

Hey don't talk about JM plays here!! Don't you know this is a labby, food, Wallco, WNBA, Sportspicks, bitch fest thread?!?!?!?! I kill me.

[hagball52]

Dang Wallco, we just went back to back again on our play posts. GL today.

[GGPLAYER]

It's because your the same person. Man I'm on fire today. Happy 4th weekend........I"m hitting the links!

[Wallco99]

Wallco is correct. Morning Bud.

Even the unofficial is technically v1 until it becomes v3.

Good morning. I see a two team overlap on MLB PLU$$$ and JM, including our (D) bet. May be a good sign. Usually we are on opposite sides on these plays.

[Wallco99]

Dang Wallco, we just went back to back again on our play posts. GL today.

I have to start keeping track whether we win or lose when that happens. Hopefully it's win. GG Player is on to us you again!

[Wallco99]

It's because your the same person. Man I'm on fire today. Happy 4th weekend........I"m hitting the links!

I'm posting plays! Replace your divots and rake the traps.

[hagball52]

Good morning. I see a two team overlap on MLB PLU$$$ and JM, including our (D) bet. May be a good sign. Usually we are on opposite sides on these plays.

Yeah I'm definitely playing it and seeing you on it with a (D) bet just makes it all that more potent. Also love your Mets play. They are one of my series plays.

[peeiempee]

D bet on Twins, good luck everyone

[zeusky]

The D bet is not yet 'official' gentlemen; Wallco when will you be posting it --any idea?

[BigBlue77]

Beaver Ball - I think Seattle Storm is an A bet. Someone who gets the JM WNBA emails please confirm. Looks like a busy day with JM plays. Gotta love it.

[hagball52]

The D bet is not yet 'official' gentlemen; Wallco when will you be posting it --any idea?

Yeah, sh*t I jumped the gun again. I saw official all down the board and then went back and checked. You're right. Here's hoping.

[BigBlue77]

I think I'm taking San Diego and Minn on ML for JM plays. Juice is too high for +1.5 RL for both those plays and I think they will win anyway.

[Wallco99]

The D bet is not yet 'official' gentlemen; Wallco when will you be posting it --any idea?

As soon as it becomes official. I am not being sarcastic, that is the best answer at this time. Sometimes it is hours before the game, sometimes it is 20 minutes. There are several things that need to be comfirmed before the play is official. Some of them already have, a few haven't.

[Wallco99]

Yeah, sh*t I jumped the gun again. I saw official all down the board and then went back and checked. You're right. Here's hoping.

I was going to put NOT OFFICIAL next to that one so that wouldn't happen, but God knows what confusion that would have caused. I listed at the top so hopefully it would be seen. It is most likely going to be the play, but this statement in no way makes it Official as of yet.

[J.M. Disciple]

Champ Selections:
Since 6/28/11

Record: 3-10
Profit: -9 units


***Each star represents 1 unit.***

[alexknyc]

Champ Selections: Since 6/28/11 Record: 3-10 Profit: -9 units ***Each star represents 1 unit.***

We need to sell shares and get enough money together to make that bet he keeps offering.

[J.M. Disciple]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~

A little help please....
The link above had the following plays....Does anyone know what
date these plays are for??
Is this updated daily??
Thank You.

3* Star pick: New York Yankees
2* Star pick: Boston Red Sox
2* Star pick: Oakland Athletics
1* Star pick: Seattle Mariners
1* Star pick: Houston Astros

That was yesterdays link.... Just look at the time / date when he posted. Top Left of each post.

[J.M. Disciple]

I will start sharing a simple 2 strike labby method as discussed in this thread several times with the JM plays. If you want to know more about how it works there is an in-depth discussion on pages 174 – 176 of this thread.

John Morrison (AKA “little Asian Girl) usually takes favorites at the ML and dogs at the +1.5 RL. However we discussed this previously, it is actually more profitable to take dogs ML and favorites on the -1.5 RL and get +odds. This works great for labby players.

*NOTE. There has not been an official back test on this strategy, so it is not recommended that you follow these bets doing a chase. I only recommend doing this using labby.


*NOTE. If our bet on the labby loses, but JM bet wins, then we move onto the next series. Do not continue to bet that same team.

Here are the current labby lines
L1: 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5
L2: 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5

Since 7/01/11
Record: 0-0
Units made:

Pending Bets:
L1: 7/01/11 Cincinnati Reds (-1.5) Odds +160 [$5 to win $8]
L1: 7/01/11 Minnesota Twins (ML) odds +100 [$5 to win $5]
L2: 7/01/11 San Diego Padres (ML) Odds +110 [$5 to win$5.75]

*Jm usually takes CIN ML, MIn +1.5, SD +1.5. This method is for Labby players only.

Special Thanks once agian to Hagball for keeping us up to date on all the JM plays. I think he deserves some points for posting so consistently and keeping a future calender for us all.

--JMD

PS: For Each new series that starts I will be dividing 1 unit over the current labby lines. This ensures that we keep up to date with JM unit count if he goes undefeated as well as suprpass his unit count if he loses. For more information on this strategy please see pages 174- 176 of this thread.

PS: Here is a quick break down of the labby method.
Start with 4 #s on each line totally 2 units. Bet the 1st and last # on the labby line. If the bet wins then cross off 1st and last # on the line. If the bet loses then add the amount you RISKED! to the end of the line. After you add the bet you lost to the end of the line you average out the line. This is called single line averaging. Take the sum of all the #s on the line and divide it by total #s on the line. If there are more then 1 bet for the day then take 1st #s for bet 1 and take 3rd and 4th #s for bet 2.

Thats it! You will begin making money.

PPS: do not listen to JM and all the scams he says about betting 10% of your roll on each series and by the end of the year you will make a million. If he loses 1 series your bankroll will go post. Recommended unit size for JM is 1% of your bankroll as a unit size.

PPPS: Avoid his champ selections because they suck! Scroll through the last couple pages on this forum to see his current record.

[19th Hole]

That was yesterdays link.... Just look at the time / date when he posted. Top Left of each post.

Thank you kindly.

[Wallco99]

I will start sharing a simple 2 strike labby method as discussed in this thread several times with the JM plays. If you want to know more about how it works there is an in-depth discussion on pages 174 – 176 of this thread.

John Morrison (AKA “little Asian Girl) usually takes favorites at the ML and dogs at the +1.5 RL. However we discussed this previously, it is actually more profitable to take dogs ML and favorites on the -1.5 RL and get +odds. This works great for labby players.

*NOTE. There has not been an official back test on this strategy, so it is not recommended that you follow these bets doing a chase. I only recommend doing this using labby.


*NOTE. If our bet on the labby loses, but JM bet wins, then we move onto the next series. Do not continue to bet that same team.

Here are the current labby lines
L1: 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5
L2: 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5 / 2.5

Since 7/01/11
Record: 0-0
Units made:

Pending Bets:
L1: 7/01/11 Cincinnati Reds (-1.5) Odds +160 [$5 to win $8]
L1: 7/01/11 Minnesota Twins (ML) odds +100 [$5 to win $5]
L2: 7/01/11 San Diego Padres (ML) Odds +110 [$5 to win$5.75]

*Jm usually takes CIN ML, MIn +1.5, SD +1.5. This method is for Labby players only.

Special Thanks once agian to Hagball for keeping us up to date on all the JM plays. I think he deserves some points for posting so consistently and keeping a future calender for us all.

--JMD

PS: For Each new series that starts I will be dividing 1 unit over the current labby lines. This ensures that we keep up to date with JM unit count if he goes undefeated as well as suprpass his unit count if he loses. For more information on this strategy please see pages 174- 176 of this thread.

PS: Here is a quick break down of the labby method.
Start with 4 #s on each line totally 2 units. Bet the 1st and last # on the labby line. If the bet wins then cross off 1st and last # on the line. If the bet loses then add the amount you RISKED! to the end of the line. After you add the bet you lost to the end of the line you average out the line. This is called single line averaging. Take the sum of all the #s on the line and divide it by total #s on the line. If there are more then 1 bet for the day then take 1st #s for bet 1 and take 3rd and 4th #s for bet 2.

Thats it! You will begin making money.

PPS: do not listen to JM and all the scams he says about betting 10% of your roll on each series and by the end of the year you will make a million. If he loses 1 series your bankroll will go post. Recommended unit size for JM is 1% of your bankroll as a unit size.

PPPS: Avoid his champ selections because they suck! Scroll through the last couple pages on this forum to see his current record.

I always play the -1.5 and M/L dogs. Don't need a labby. I am ahead of JM at this point money wise, even with one extra loss. I think it is great that you keep coming up with different ideas. However, there is only one common item with everything you bring here. It ALWAYS says "not backtested" in your post, then one week later you lose a bunch of $ and abort system. I am in no way bashing you, but rather trying to say, why don't you backtest these ideas before you bring them in here. Then you will know whether or not they are worth while. Some people will just play anything that get's put on here whether they are tested or not, and they will lose a ton during the experiment, regardless of whether you say "for labby only" or "play it light, it hasn't been tested". I know that my system has been on a bad run, but I can continue to post it becasuse I know it has made over 500 units in the past 6 years, not saying it will continue, but chances are at some point it will. When you get on these systems you keep posting, you get down early and then you quit, since you haven't tested them, you really don't know if you should have stuck with it or if you made the right decision in stopping. The same is true if you win at the beginning. This is actually more dangerous because you could be playing a losing system, but because it got off to a good start, you tell yourself it is great, which will take you even longer to give up on it, and could potentially wipe you out. I am by no means trying to lecture, who would I think I am to do that, but you have no idea how many baseball systems I tested over the winter, many which had a great one or even two years, then the bottom just dropped out the years before that. I have checked on a couple of them this season, and was very happy I made the decision I did. One of them is actually doing very well, and I think if I backtest a couple of adjustments, it may actually be a winner. But I will not experimentally post in here until I have finished backtesting. I know me and G had a lot of words earlier in the week, but when I thought I was possibly on to an addition to MLB PLU$$$, and I was going to post the plays as unofficial to track on here, he said that would be doing a disservice to the bettors, especially the ones I mentioned above, and nothing should be posted until properly tested. Though we had our differences, he made a good point and I had to agree with him, and I pulled the post. This could actually get real confusing since the actual JM plays are already being posted in this thread. You know I don't have to tell you where that can lead. But, as stated before, it is an open forum and people are free to post as they wish, just do it with proper testing and responsibility, and things should take care of themselves. As I said earlier, I have been playing this method all season (with chase) and it is doing very well, but because I haven't tested it, I've kept it to myself for the most part. Good luck.

[J.M. Disciple]

@ Wallco

You are absolutely correct in everything you have posted. However, this time around my history will not repeat itself. If this "new system" fails, then I give you my word I will not post any new systems unless back tested for atleast 5 years.

If anyone has last seasons results i will go through it and test it with the labby assuming +100 odds using the method I posted above. I will need the team your betting on, score of the game, and favorite / dog.

As you have said this is a thread where people can post basically whatever they want and I will continue to post these plays and results until proven other wise.


Thanks for keeping me honest though Wallco.

--JMD

[Wallco99]

@ Wallco

You are absolutely correct in everything you have posted. However, this time around my history will not repeat itself. If this "new system" fails, then I give you my word I will not post any new systems unless back tested for atleast 5 years.

If anyone has last seasons results i will go through it and test it with the labby assuming +100 odds using the method I posted above. I will need the team your betting on, score of the game, and favorite / dog.

As you have said this is a thread where people can post basically whatever they want and I will continue to post these plays and results until proven other wise.


Thanks for keeping me honest though Wallco.

--JMD

I wasn't telling you not to post, just be careful and sure of what you do post. The thing is, I like this one, for chase anyway, but even though it has been working for me, I don't know the long haul results of this method. Wilba may actually know this. This is the same scenario we went through just a couple months back with JM NBA, if you remember correctly. Stevex and I were playing all games at -110. Several people, including yourself, told me that over the long haul it will lose, even though our results last year were great, Wilba's backtests showed otherwise. This is kind of the same exact thing. If you felt that way then, you should also feel that way now, and understand the importance of the back test. But just to reiterate, I like this bet scheme a lot, and hope that when I finally get a chance to test it, the results are good. Good luck.

[Gcan]

John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)

7/1 Cincinnati Reds [A]
Cleveland Indians

7/1 San Diego Padres [A]
Seattle Mariners




BOL

[hagball52]

Morrison plays are official. Thanks for posting.

[adidas-b 88]

Here are JM's The Champ Selections for 7/1/2011

We closed out June on a small downturn, but our incredible earlier win streak gave the month a huge winning swing! Let's keep our strong momentum going. I'm sensing a July of massive profits!

Here are my upcoming personal picks:

http://www.thechampselections.com/p/763300.html (Not live yet-Read below)

Important: Please note that the link above is not yet ready as of now. I usually have the picks posted by 3:15 P.M. Eastern Time each day. Check the link at that time and you'll find it live.

Best regards
John Morrison, PhD
SportsBettingChamp.com and SportsPicksBuffet.com

[adidas-b 88]

Disregard my previous post about champ selection picks. There are no picks today.

[adidas-b 88]

A reminder for JM WNBA followers:

7/1/2011

Seattle vs Conn (A)

[Andy3568]

Does the JM WNBA system really make money?

I did a quick backtest on the last three seasons (2008 - 2010), and the only one that made money was 2008, and it wasn't enough to offset the losses in 2009 and 2010. Granted it was a really quick backtest with none of the usual JM filters he throws out to eliminate losses, like injuries and road records.

I have nothing against betting women's basketball if it's a money maker. I just don't see it.

[ken23lau]

Does the JM WNBA system really make money?

I did a quick backtest on the last three seasons (2008 - 2010), and the only one that made money was 2008, and it wasn't enough to offset the losses in 2009 and 2010. Granted it was a really quick backtest with none of the usual JM filters he throws out to eliminate losses, like injuries and road records.

I have nothing against betting women's basketball if it's a money maker. I just don't see it.

If you labby it, the losses get made up. Unlike chases where you don't really offset the C bet losses.

[ken23lau]

I wasn't telling you not to post, just be careful and sure of what you do post. The thing is, I like this one, for chase anyway, but even though it has been working for me, I don't know the long haul results of this method. Wilba may actually know this. This is the same scenario we went through just a couple months back with JM NBA, if you remember correctly. Stevex and I were playing all games at -110. Several people, including yourself, told me that over the long haul it will lose, even though our results last year were great, Wilba's backtests showed otherwise. This is kind of the same exact thing. If you felt that way then, you should also feel that way now, and understand the importance of the back test. But just to reiterate, I like this bet scheme a lot, and hope that when I finally get a chance to test it, the results are good. Good luck.

I know it's going to be like 2 years until we're going to be able to bet on JM NBA....so it is actually tested that buying the 3 points is better?