John Morrison 2011 MLB

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1)
(A) 8-4
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 2-1
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 7-0

*Unofficial*
(6/16/2011) Arizona (.503) v San Francisco (.521) M/L (C) V2 Win

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(6/17/2011) Oakland (.478)v San Francisco (.519) R/L (A) (6/18 (B) & 6/19 (C) if necessary)

Notes:
Now, note that even though Arizona cashed in, and I had inside info
that they would, I will not be counting it as an official win under
the system due to the fact that it did not meet the RPI requirement
by the time the series ended. It will be counted as an unofficial win.
That came from the man himself. I went back and removed the (A) and (B) bet losses so as not to confuse. I still counted the V2 play as a win but I'm not sure that that is correct because of the unofficial play. Out of 6 possible sweeps yesterday there were 3 and only 2 resulted in future plays. They are:
FLA v PHI (7/04)
HOU @ PIT (7/04)
Mark 'em down. I'll post the complete updated list later.

[GGPLAYER]

Notes:
Now, note that even though Arizona cashed in, and I had inside info
that they would, I will not be counting it as an official win under
the system due to the fact that it did not meet the RPI requirement
by the time the series ended. It will be counted as an unofficial win.
That came from the man himself. I went back and removed the (A) and (B) bet losses so as not to confuse. I still counted the V2 play as a win but I'm not sure that that is correct because of the unofficial play.


Come'on! I wonder if he worries that he has no soul.

[hagball52]

Notes:
Now, note that even though Arizona cashed in, and I had inside info
that they would, I will not be counting it as an official win under
the system due to the fact that it did not meet the RPI requirement
by the time the series ended. It will be counted as an unofficial win.
That came from the man himself. I went back and removed the (A) and (B) bet losses so as not to confuse. I still counted the V2 play as a win but I'm not sure that that is correct because of the unofficial play.


Come'on! I wonder if he worries that he has no soul.

I sent him an email last night calling him a spineless weasel and asked him how he wanted to score the series. He actually sent out that email. And you're right he has no soul. Notice in his email how he says that he has had only 2 losing days in the last 4 weeks, he fails to say the other days were winning days. He'll usually send out 2 plays and he splits a lot. I found that out when I had the "champselections".

I've had only 2 losing days in the last 4 weeks of my daily picks.
That's how much of an absolutely indestructible winning run my
picks have been on James!

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1)
(A) 8-4
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 2-1
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 7-0

*Unofficial*
(6/16/2011) Arizona (.503) v San Francisco (.521) M/L (C) V2 Win

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(6/17/2011) Oakland (.478)v San Francisco (.519) R/L (A) (6/18 (B) & 6/19 (C) if necessary)

Notes:
Now, note that even though Arizona cashed in, and I had inside info
that they would, I will not be counting it as an official win under
the system due to the fact that it did not meet the RPI requirement
by the time the series ended. It will be counted as an unofficial win.
That came from the man himself. I went back and removed the (A) and (B) bet losses so as not to confuse. I still counted the V2 play as a win but I'm not sure that that is correct because of the unofficial play. Out of 6 possible sweeps yesterday there were 3 and only 2 resulted in future plays. They are:
FLA v PHI (7/04)
HOU @ PIT (7/04)
Mark 'em down. I'll post the complete updated list later.

P.S. Forgot to mention if OAK wins first game it becomes a V3 play. GL all

[thelimit0310]

Thanks Hagball!

[dukipl]

[Bugs Bunny]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1)
(A) 8-4
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 2-1
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 7-0

*Unofficial*
(6/16/2011) Arizona (.503) v San Francisco (.521) M/L (C) V2 Win

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(6/17/2011) Oakland (.478)v San Francisco (.519) R/L (A) (6/18 (B) & 6/19 (C) if necessary)

Notes:
Now, note that even though Arizona cashed in, and I had inside info
that they would, I will not be counting it as an official win under
the system due to the fact that it did not meet the RPI requirement
by the time the series ended. It will be counted as an unofficial win.
That came from the man himself. I went back and removed the (A) and (B) bet losses so as not to confuse. I still counted the V2 play as a win but I'm not sure that that is correct because of the unofficial play. Out of 6 possible sweeps yesterday there were 3 and only 2 resulted in future plays. They are:
FLA v PHI (7/04)
HOU @ PIT (7/04)
Mark 'em down. I'll post the complete updated list later.

Thanks hagball again for the update

and thanks to wallco too. Even though it was yet another D bet loss... i'm still + units with you
Keep the plays coming man

[rickbo528]

Morrison should be on the Comedy Central channel with the emails he sends out. The best comedy writers in the world couldn't write his material.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 94-7
System profit/loss: +11.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -8.86 units (79-7) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0

(6/16/11) Milwaukee (-1½) (D) – Loss


(A) 53-48
(B) 22-26
(C) 12-14
(D) 7-7


Games for (6/17/11):
N.Y. Yankees (M/L) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
N.Y. Yankees (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
Toronto (M/L) @ Cincinnati (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
Houston @ L.A. Dodgers (M/L) (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
Houston @ L.A. Dodgers (-1½) (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
Kansas City @ St. Louis (M/L) (A) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)
Kansas City @ St. Louis (-1½) (A) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)
Philadelphia (M/L) @ Seattle (A) (10:10 pm EDT)

IMPORTANT: READ PARAGRAPH BELOW

NOTE: There is a potential for N.Y Yankees to play Cincinnati in both of their respective (D) bets. Based on the outcome of the next three games, there is a possibility that we may be on both sides of a (D) bet, meaning at least one will lose if that should happen. The same holds true for Philadelphia and St. Louis. My recommendation would be to skip these bets until one of the series has finished, then if the other series is still open, pick it up at that point. I am a risk taker, so I will be playing ALL the games, however, this may not be the best approach for some people. The bets will all be marked official as usual, and will all count towards system wins/losses, but the way you wish to play them is entirely your decision. There is a good possibility of making over 10 units of profit with these, but the risk of a big loss also exists here. Just for the record, you have been warned.

** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[hagball52]

Here's an update JM System Plays.
4/25 MIL v CIN Win [b] 4/26 O v2
5/02 LAA @ BOS Win [C] 5/04 O
5/03 SEA v TEX Win [A] U
5/06 TAM @ BAL Win [A] O
5/09 NYM @ COL Win [A] O
5/09 CHW @ LAA Win [A] U
5/13 SEA @ CLE Win [A] U
5/13 BAL @ TAM Win [b] 5/14 O
5/23 BOS @ CLE Win [b] 5/24 U
5/23 MIL v WAS Win [A] O
5/30 SEA v BAL Win [A] O
5/30 WAS v PHI Win [A] U
6/02 MIN @ KAN Win [A] U
6/03 CHW v DET Win [A] O
6/06 BAL v OAK Win [A] O
6/07 NYY v BOS Loss [C] 6/09 O v2
6/09 DET V SEA Win [A] O
6/14 DET v CLE Win [A] O
6/14 ARI v SFO Win [C] 6/16 U v2
6/17 OAK v SFO
7/01 CIN v CLE
7/01 SDG @ SEA
7/04 FLA v PHI
7/04 HOU @ PIT
7/04 TOR @ BOS
7/04 STL v CIN
7/04 MIN v TAM
7/14 KAN @ MIN
7/14 COL v MIL
7/14 BAL v CLE
7/21 MIN v DET
7/22 OAK @ NYY
7/22 CHC v HOU
7/22 SDG @ PHI
7/29 FLA @ ATL
7/29 CHC @ STL
7/29 BOS @ CHW
7/29 KAN @ CLE
8/01 STL @ MIL
8/02 KAN v BAL
8/05 NYY @ BOS
8/05 CLE @ TEX
8/08 HOU @ ARI
8/12 SFO @ FLA
8/12 PIT @ MIL
8/12 ARI v NYM
8/15 OAK v BAL
8/15 SFO @ ATL
8/22 BOS @ TEX
8/22 TAM v DET
8/26 OAK @ BOS
9/09 PIT v FLA
9/12 HOU v PHI
9/23 FLA @ MIL


V3 System Plays
5/10 LAA v CHW Win [A]
6/03 KAN v MIN Loss [C] 6/05

Here's the list to date. The O and U are for Official and Unofficial. Just trying to keep everyone informed. Feel free to edit and let me know if there are any mistakes. I usually double and triple check but still manage to screw up once in awhile.

[hagball52]

Wallco, Good luck this weekend.

[Wallco99]

Wallco, Good luck this weekend.

You too, buddy!

[thelimit0310]

Thanks for the plays Wallco, we have been warned! Best of luck to all of you!

[GGPLAYER]

Yes the Yanks will get that money back from those damn Cubs for us!

[Glada Tartan]

Go Yanks!!

[Wallco99]

Go Yanks!!

I had a feeling you would like that one.

[J.M. Disciple]

lalaw... I am still here. My internet is currently broken at my house, so I am unable to get online much these past few days. I am still reading through this thread every other day at friends house though. Soon as i get rid of my desktop and get a laptop to start my labby again i will be able to start posting more. For the time being i think me not clogging the thread has been pretty pleasant

Lets go A's! STL, NYY, TOR, LAD, and possibly philly?

GL to both systems today.

[eyeball]

Thanks Wallco

[Glada Tartan]

I had a feeling you would like that one.

Yeaah

Lets get´em tonight Wallco!

[Kev the Brit]

Pre-V3 bet on the Giants tonight. If they lose, you carry forward the loss plus your target as your A bet to win tomorrow. Simples.

Kev

[Kev the Brit]

Wallco, your stats, from above:

(A) 49-48
(B) 20-25
(C) 12-14
(D) 7-7

They appear to be unbalanced. 48 A bet losses normally create 48 B bets, rather than the 45 you have listed. Similarly, 25 B bet losses normally create 25 C bets, rather than the 26 you have listed. Apologies if I've missed something in your posts to explain my observation.

Kev

[Wallco99]

Wallco, your stats, from above:
They appear to be unbalanced. 48 A bet losses normally create 48 B bets, rather than the 45 you have listed. Similarly, 25 B bet losses normally create 25 C bets, rather than the 26 you have listed. Apologies if I've missed something in your posts to explain my observation.

Kev

Fixed, had the A's and B's a little off, don't know what the hell I did. Thanks

[GGPLAYER]

I thought this Davis guy for Chi was like 0-5 and had an ERA around 6........hello Yankee bats where are you???

[1gamer]

I just placed a wager on the Cubs winning the 2011 World Series Championship:

+10000

[schenker88]

bol today!

[NZT-48]

Here's an update JM System Plays.
4/25 MIL v CIN Win [b] 4/26 O v2
5/02 LAA @ BOS Win [C] 5/04 O
5/03 SEA v TEX Win [A] U
5/06 TAM @ BAL Win [A] O
5/09 NYM @ COL Win [A] O
5/09 CHW @ LAA Win [A] U
5/13 SEA @ CLE Win [A] U
5/13 BAL @ TAM Win [b] 5/14 O
5/23 BOS @ CLE Win [b] 5/24 U
5/23 MIL v WAS Win [A] O
5/30 SEA v BAL Win [A] O
5/30 WAS v PHI Win [A] U
6/02 MIN @ KAN Win [A] U
6/03 CHW v DET Win [A] O
6/06 BAL v OAK Win [A] O
6/07 NYY v BOS Loss [C] 6/09 O v2
6/09 DET V SEA Win [A] O
6/14 DET v CLE Win [A] O
6/14 ARI v SFO Win [C] 6/16 U v2
6/17 OAK v SFO
7/01 CIN v CLE
7/01 SDG @ SEA
7/04 FLA v PHI
7/04 HOU @ PIT
7/04 TOR @ BOS
7/04 STL v CIN
7/04 MIN v TAM
7/14 KAN @ MIN
7/14 COL v MIL
7/14 BAL v CLE
7/21 MIN v DET
7/22 OAK @ NYY
7/22 CHC v HOU
7/22 SDG @ PHI
7/29 FLA @ ATL
7/29 CHC @ STL
7/29 BOS @ CHW
7/29 KAN @ CLE
8/01 STL @ MIL
8/02 KAN v BAL
8/05 NYY @ BOS
8/05 CLE @ TEX
8/08 HOU @ ARI
8/12 SFO @ FLA
8/12 PIT @ MIL
8/12 ARI v NYM
8/15 OAK v BAL
8/15 SFO @ ATL
8/22 BOS @ TEX
8/22 TAM v DET
8/26 OAK @ BOS
9/09 PIT v FLA
9/12 HOU v PHI
9/23 FLA @ MIL


V3 System Plays
5/10 LAA v CHW Win [A]
6/03 KAN v MIN Loss [C] 6/05

Here's the list to date. The O and U are for Official and Unofficial. Just trying to keep everyone informed. Feel free to edit and let me know if there are any mistakes. I usually double and triple check but still manage to screw up once in awhile.

hey hag we talked about this before be careful of adding the Yankees-Red Sox series again as another official play as far I know and have seen in the past once a team gets sweeped twice meaning we lost an A.B,C betting official series we dont bet on them again its a done deal b/c it happened last yr once the Padres beat the Giants twice in a row and then later played them again and it wasnt a play the 3rd time out later

[xgame]

I just placed a wager on the Cubs winning the 2011 World Series Championship: +10000

you placed $1?

[hagball52]

hey hag we talked about this before be careful of adding the Yankees-Red Sox series again as another official play as far I know and have seen in the past once a team gets sweeped twice meaning we lost an A.B,C betting official series we dont bet on them again its a done deal b/c it happened last yr once the Padres beat the Giants twice in a row and then later played them again and it wasnt a play the 3rd time out later

Yeah I know. I recorded it because it was a sweep. This is just my own personal file that I share. When the play does come up we'll see what JM does and then just drop it if it's a no play. I'd rather have on there and remove it rather than JM posting it and I'm going wtf !

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/17/11
2011 System to date: 94-7
System profit/loss: +11.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -8.86 units (79-7) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0

N.Y. Yankees (M/L)@ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
N.Y. Yankees (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (A) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)
Toronto (M/L) @ Cincinnati (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
Houston @ L.A. Dodgers (M/L) (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
Houston @ L.A. Dodgers (-1½) (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
Kansas City @ St. Louis (M/L) (A) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)
Kansas City @ St. Louis (-1½) (A) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)
Philadelphia (M/L) @ Seattle (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)

IMPORTANT: READ PARAGRAPH BELOW

NOTE: There is a potential for N.Y Yankees to play Cincinnati in both of their respective (D) bets. Based on the outcome of the next three games, there is a possibility that we may be on both sides of a (D) bet, meaning at least one will lose if that should happen. The same holds true for Philadelphia and St. Louis. My recommendation would be to skip these bets until one of the series has finished, then if the other series is still open, pick it up at that point. I am a risk taker, so I will be playing ALL the games, however, this may not be the best approach for some people. The bets will all be marked official as usual, and will all count towards system wins/losses, but the way you wish to play them is entirely your decision. There is a good possibility of making over 10 units of profit with these, but the risk of a big loss also exists here. Just for the record, you have been warned.

** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[1gamer]

you placed $1?

$1 would even be too much money. Especially after that Steve Bartman incident

[thelimit0310]

Quite comical actually. When we bet the Cubs to win, they get handed. When we bet the Cubs to lose, they beat even the best of teams. Let's hope this trend breaks sometime soon.

[1gamer]

Alot of people forget that if it wasn't for Bartman, the Cubs would have met the Yankees in the WS.

CASH The Jays

[bauerranch]

Quite comical actually. When we bet the Cubs to win, they get handed. When we bet the Cubs to lose, they beat even the best of teams. Let's hope this trend breaks sometime soon.

I agree= lets go Cardinals!

[lawalahmed]

Quite comical actually. When we bet the Cubs to win, they get handed. When we bet the Cubs to lose, they beat even the best of teams. Let's hope this trend breaks sometime soon.

May be WALLCO is dating CUBS Girl Friends......

[papacitogalan]

sorry, could you tell me where in the forum I can present my predictions?



Regards.