LB thread for MLB plays 2010

[PAYTON20]

NYsportsguy the only thing I needed to read in your comment was that you are betting SBR points. End of story

[ROFLcopter]

So.... you're telling us that you only bet SBR points.. is that correct?

[$Burm$]

1 time i bet 500 sbr pts to win 25 on rafael nadal and it hit, it was sickkkkk

[lakerboy]

Dude....stop being so sensitive. I realize that you're really into posting and making plays where you think the under dog can win. But you have to realize those hit very rarely. Most people prefer hearing when a person makes threads where the bets he recommends are linked to sports knowledge and not "public sway" or lottery type odds. And I don't care whether you give me SBR points or not....I got a 60 loan and turned it into 250. I then took that 250...got bored and played black jack which on this site is a scam.

(Little did I know that the SBR black jack hits 20's and 21's like every 5 hands.) So I learned my lesson from that....now from sports betting I am back up to 250 SBR points again. The key is.....I WIN IN SPORTS BETTING BY JUDGING ACTUAL PLAYERS AND TEAMS AND SPORTS RELATED CONTENT AND THEN MAKE A PRUDENT JUDGEMENT!

If that's being rude and disrespectful to you then i don't wanna be "Nice". No problem....I won't ask you for points again...I thought you were mature. PS -If I see you write a thread about a play using sound judgement and logic and not just another "gut feeling" play I have no problem giving you credit for it either. But let's see you make some first....honestly all I see you post are under dog bets that aren't very favorable unless compared to like 15% or less odds to hit.

Then how come no one views your threads with all those square plays? GO and check out your plays in my NFL thread. I think your hitting around 10% with sound judgement.

[MidgetTossers]

most people here bet sbr points or 5-10 bucks a game..just let the loser be...its not worth the time and energy

[Pauulzcappin]

[MidgetTossers]

1 time i bet 500 sbr pts to win 25 on rafael nadal and it hit, it was sickkkkk

[Wilforth]

alright, so for MLB im guessing most large movements are actual sharp $ then unless the books are trying to fuk around, cuz my guess would be that a large part of the general public doesn't bet TT in baseball??? but then again im prolly wrong there as well haha

You're right! The conventional bets are sides and totals.

[msj0001]

NYSportsguy is a fvcking drama queen...I thought this thread had finally gotten back to focusing on the actual games

[Pauulzcappin]

LB you know if yanks take this one you might as well just pay the points from our wager on series right?

[lakerboy]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/college-football-handicapping/701619-can-someone-loan-me-60-sbr-points-oklhma-st-game.html

[broadway6]

Dude....stop being so sensitive. I realize that you're really into posting and making plays where you think the under dog can win. But you have to realize those hit very rarely. Most people who tail on this site prefer hearing when a person makes threads where the bets he recommends are linked to sports knowledge and not "public sway" or lottery type odds. And I don't care whether you give me SBR points or not....I got a 60 loan and turned it into 250. I then took that 250...got bored and played black jack which on this site is a scam.

(Little did I know that the SBR black jack hits 20's and 21's like every 5 hands.) So I learned my lesson from that....now from sports betting I am back up to 250 SBR points again. The key is.....I WIN IN SPORTS BETTING BY JUDGING ACTUAL PLAYERS AND TEAMS AND SPORTS RELATED CONTENT AND THEN MAKE A PRUDENT JUDGEMENT!

If that's being rude and disrespectful to you then i don't wanna be "Nice". No problem....I won't ask you for points again...I thought you were mature. PS -If I see you write a thread about a play using sound judgement and logic and not just another "gut feeling" play I have no problem giving you credit for it either. But let's see you make some first....honestly all I see you post are under dog bets that aren't very favorable unless compared to like 15% or less odds to hit.

so you don't bet dogs? how many sbr points have you won in the nfl this year? gfy

[MidgetTossers]

2 more outs please!!

[$Burm$]

2 more outs please!!

1 moreeee

[Pauulzcappin]

2 more outs please!!

1

[lakerboy]

Plays for Week 3: Go with Giants ML, 49ers (-2.5), Redskins (-5), Colts -Broncos OVER 47.5 and Texans-Cowgirls over 47.5 & Packers (-3) to cover easily[/color]
Those were NY squareguys plays in week 3.
1 win 5 losses.

Cant understand how your rational let you down. [/color]

[MidgetTossers]

that was a fukkin catch!!!

[Pauulzcappin]

WOW WTF, THAT WAs a catch you fukks

[MidgetTossers]

wow

[Pauulzcappin]

the ball was caught. jeez i hope that doesn't bite us in the ass.

[NYSportsGuy210]

LB thinks differently than an average capper, he thinks outside the box. Dude is a long term winner

In stock investing there are two schools of judging stocks. Technical and fundamental analysis. In order to be the best of the best and have the greatest % of winning you must have a good grasp and knowledge of both types of information and when and how to apply them.

IMO...and I am not trying to be rude or assasine or "dump" on LB.....but I have noticed he uses just one aspect of this school of thought in sports betting...and that is the technical side. Technical is looking just a tlines, and where the public is putting money on a certain bet and trying to determine what the "square move" is and doing the opposite. More often than not, doing that will get you "slaughtered" because facts, figures and basic sports knowledge and ideas of the athletes and coaches involved are not being put into use.

I would like LB to do more of this in his sports betting recommendations because I really don't see it in his analysis almost at all.

[$Burm$]

Plays for Week 3: Go with Giants ML, 49ers (-2.5), Redskins (-5), Colts -Broncos OVER 47.5 and Texans-Cowgirls over 47.5 & Packers (-3) to cover easily[/color]
Those were NY squareguys plays in week 3.
1 win 5 losses.

Cant understand how your rational let you down. [/color]

haha oh man...and i thought i had a rough day today

[keijo32]

How do they miss a call like this

[MidgetTossers]

if the twins score here i am done gambling

[msj0001]

that was a fvcking OUT!!!! that better not come back to screw us over

[superjeff24]

I think people here are too sensitive. So I sent a harmless jab about him going against Halladay, so what? Does that mean I'm ungrateful for the great picks he provides? Absolutely not. If he left, I'd be upset too, he knows his stuff. It's like some people are stuck in playground mode where being called a poo poo head is reason enough to take your ball and run inside. Grow up, I'm in construction and we bust balls all the time. It's as affection, not to belittle each other.

[Pauulzcappin]

pop out. suck my dick guccione you piece of shit.

[MidgetTossers]

pay me bitch!!

[MidgetTossers]

I think people here are too sensitive. So I sent a harmless jab about him going against Halladay, so what? Does that mean I'm ungrateful for the great picks he provides? Absolutely not. If he left, I'd be upset too, he knows his stuff. It's like some people are stuck in playground mode where being called a poo poo head is reason enough to take your ball and run inside. Grow up, I'm in construction and we bust balls all the time. It's as affection, not to belittle each other.

poo poo head.......

[azplaya]

Ballgame cash that RL!

[$Burm$]

In stock investing there are two schools of judging stocks. Technical and fundamental analysis. In order to be the best of the best and have the greatest % of winning you must have a good grasp and knowledge of both types of information and when and how to apply them.

IMO...and I am not trying to be rude or assasine or "dump" on LB.....but I have noticed he uses just one aspect of this school of thought in sports betting...and that is the technical side. Technical is looking just a tlines, and where the public is putting money on a certain bet and trying to determine what the "square move" is and doing the opposite. More often than not, doing that will get you "slaughtered" because facts, figures and basic sports knowledge and ideas of the athletes and coaches involved are not being put into use.

I would like LB to do more of this in his sports betting recommendations because I really don't see it in his analysis almost at all.

Your making betting to hard on yourself bro. Capping every game is a complete waste of time. All of those stats and trends are already considered into the line anyways.

[lakerboy]

NY guy in case you havent noticed i am winning nonstop in every sport except soccer. How am i getting slaughtered when i have locals who have cut me off and lowered my limits and i play thru other guys now. IMO you dont look at anything but stats and that wont get you anywhere cause its all applied into the line.

[ayuntalo]

Cash it lb!
With the yanks as well..
To everyone

[broadway6]

In stock investing there are two schools of judging stocks. Technical and fundamental analysis. In order to be the best of the best and have the greatest % of winning you must have a good grasp and knowledge of both types of information and when and how to apply them.

IMO...and I am not trying to be rude or assasine or "dump" on LB.....but I have noticed he uses just one aspect of this school of thought in sports betting...and that is the technical side. Technical is looking just a tlines, and where the public is putting money on a certain bet and trying to determine what the "square move" is and doing the opposite. More often than not, doing that will get you "slaughtered" because facts, figures and basic sports knowledge and ideas of the athletes and coaches involved are not being put into use.

I would like LB to do more of this in his sports betting recommendations because I really don't see it in his analysis almost at all.

time for you to go type in another thread....

[lakerboy]

Yanks win . Nice. So i go 2-3 today and lose a couple of units.