Originally posted by funnyb25
MLB - Thursday, 8/18/16
Collapse
X
-
dirtycash66SBR MVP
- 04-13-12
- 2958
#36Thats MLBComment -
McCarthyFamSBR MVP
- 07-06-11
- 1700
#37i'd take a push over 2 unit loss anydayOriginally posted by funnyb25Tigers had bases loaded 0 out and got only 1 run on a walk. That's brutalComment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#38For sure...k rod time..lolOriginally posted by McCarthyFami'd take a push over 2 unit loss anydayComment -
stackz125SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-03-16
- 6198
#39LT made money on those the Tigers. I'm pretty sure he bets to win 1 unit. RL was +money so he would not have bet a whole unit.Originally posted by McCarthyFami'd take a push over 2 unit loss anydayComment -
McCarthyFamSBR MVP
- 07-06-11
- 1700
#40speaking on my behalfOriginally posted by stackz125LT made money on those the Tigers. I'm pretty sure he bets to win 1 unit. RL was +money so he would not have bet a whole unit.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#41He definitely broke even on the game. To win 1 unit on favs. Risk 1 unit on dogsOriginally posted by stackz125LT made money on those the Tigers. I'm pretty sure he bets to win 1 unit. RL was +money so he would not have bet a whole unit.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#42Actually stackz125 is right regarding how I bet in real life. It is just MUCH easier to keep records at SBR the conventional way.Originally posted by funnyb25He definitely broke even on the game. To win 1 unit on favs. Risk 1 unit on dogsComment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#43So you don't even wager the way you advertise? Wow...Originally posted by LT ProfitsActually stackz125 is right regarding how I bet in real life. It is just MUCH easier to keep records at SBR the conventional way.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#44I bet TO WIN 2.5% of BR 99% of the time. Just that when you bet 1000 games a year, don't want to do extra math with record keeping when calculating using base method literally takes seconds.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#45At the end of the day it's the individuals decision to tail or not but I still think it's very misleading..BOL anyways...Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#46Not really because its close enough in the long run, so it's really much ado about nothing. Besides it's never going to be exact because remember I bet % of BR and I recalc BR every morning. Also base record keeping works best for comparative purposes.Originally posted by funnyb25At the end of the day it's the individuals decision to tail or not but I still think it's very misleading..BOL anyways...Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#47On another note...Salazar has now given up 14 runs in his last 2 starts plus this inningComment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#48Season is almost over.Originally posted by LT ProfitsStill beating closing line around 60% of the time, which is sure sign of a working model. I'll be fine.Comment -
HeeluvaGuySBR MVP
- 02-15-14
- 3449
#49The over is 14-5 with this ump and his games are averaging 10.6 runs. He's the 4th most profitable over ump this season.Originally posted by funnyb25On another note...Salazar has now given up 14 runs in his last 2 starts plus this inningComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#50You're consistently beating the closer this season, yet you're in the red.Originally posted by LT ProfitsStill beating closing line around 60% of the time, which is sure sign of a working model. I'll be fine.
You have been getting crushed for two years straight on plays where you get an "outstanding" number vs. the closing number.
See what I'm getting at yet?Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#51Right, my main point is that model is beating closers at the same rate as my +93 season last year, so no reason to overhaul things.Originally posted by lakerboySeason is almost over.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#52You are missing a critical point. It is ALWAYS good to beat the closer even when you are losing because it means you lose less. So even with a losing record, beating closers has enabled me to limit the damage to -5 units and keep me in a position where I could still easily finish in the black.Originally posted by No coincidencesYou're consistently beating the closer this season, yet you're in the red.
You have been getting crushed for two years straight on plays where you get an "outstanding" number vs. the closing number.
See what I'm getting at yet?Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#53Yet LT has the under....prolly didn't adjust model for the new SalazarOriginally posted by HeeluvaGuyThe over is 14-5 with this ump and his games are averaging 10.6 runs. He's the 4th most profitable over ump this season.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#54Salazar done after 1 inning...hahahaComment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#55I notice from your comments that you put too much emphasis on this year only. I have Johnson neutral, umpire ratings are based on last three seasons (well last two full seasons plus current one).Originally posted by HeeluvaGuyThe over is 14-5 with this ump and his games are averaging 10.6 runs. He's the 4th most profitable over ump this season.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#56The "new" Salazar is hurt, can't cap that.Originally posted by funnyb25Salazar done after 1 inning...hahaha
Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#57He gave up 10 runs in his 2 previous starts before this...you can cap thatOriginally posted by LT ProfitsThe "new" Salazar is hurt, can't cap that.
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#58I fully understand that concept, but you are missing my point.Originally posted by LT ProfitsYou are missing a critical point. It is ALWAYS good to beat the closer even when you are losing because it means you lose less. So even with a losing record, beating closers has enabled me to limit the damage to -5 units and keep me in a position where I could still easily finish in the black.
If you aren't watching games and/or can't pick winners, everything you just said is completely and utterly irrelevant -- unless your goal as a gambler is simply to "lose less."Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#59Have you watched him pitch (or try to pitch) recently?Originally posted by LT ProfitsThe "new" Salazar is hurt, can't cap that.
(operative word being watched)Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#60But he still has great YTD numbers, so a couple of bad starts (without injury reported) doesn't bother me and it sometimes adds value in the next start.Originally posted by funnyb25He gave up 10 runs in his 2 previous starts before this...you can cap thatComment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#6110 earned runs past 2 starts didn't change his model at all..lolOriginally posted by No coincidencesHave you watched him pitch (or try to pitch) recently?
(operative word being watched)Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#62Yet you lost every play. I really am starting to wonder if you even wager real moneyOriginally posted by LT ProfitsBut he still has great YTD numbers, so a couple of bad starts (without injury reported) doesn't bother me and it sometimes adds value in the next start.Comment -
HeeluvaGuySBR MVP
- 02-15-14
- 3449
#63I agree that I tend to focus on the season at hand. I also get that you have a different approach. No biggie.Originally posted by LT ProfitsI notice from your comments that you put too much emphasis on this year only. I have Johnson neutral, umpire ratings are based on last three seasons (well last two full seasons plus current one).
Also, I read (am not currently watching), that Salazaar was throwing in the pen after he was yanked. Would seem to indicate that he's not hurt.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#64You (and seemingly everybody else) are overreacting, I am down FIVE freaking units after over 700 plays, so I think I am still doing a good job of finding value. And you have seen the imbalance of bad losses vs. lucky wins I have had this year. So again, I will be fine and, despite what your claim, I would not be where I am without the good BTCL rate.Originally posted by No coincidencesI fully understand that concept, but you are missing my point.
If you aren't watching games and/or can't pick winners, everything you just said is completely and utterly irrelevant -- unless your goal as a gambler is simply to "lose less."Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#65You said the exact opposite recently -- that both this year and last year, you've been losing the plays consistently when you handily BTCL.Originally posted by LT ProfitsSo again, I will be fine and, despite what your claim, I would not be where I am without the good BTCL rate.
So which is it?Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#66Emphasis on 2 starts. Nobody should adjust for 2 bad starts when a guy is having a great year, that would be an extreme overreaction. But why do I even need to say this, that should be obvious.Originally posted by funnyb2510 earned runs past 2 starts didn't change his model at all..lolComment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#67[QUOTE=No coincidences;26149550]You said the exact opposite recently -- that both this year and last year, you've been losing the plays consistently when you handily BTCL.
How am I saying the opposite, they are two different things. I have losing record on game with extreme BTCL of 30+. But I am still in good shape because I limited the damage by getting those great lines (i.e., lost less), and I was over +100 units last year on games where I beat closers by < 30.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#68If you'd watched him pitch recently, you'd know his velocity was down and something like this was no surprise.Originally posted by LT ProfitsEmphasis on 2 starts. Nobody should adjust for 2 bad starts when a guy is having a great year, that would be an extreme overreaction. But why do I even need to say this, that should be obvious.
He now has an ERA well over 6 in his last 8 starts, BTW.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#698 starts doesn't matter either man...it's all about what happened first 3 months of the seasonOriginally posted by No coincidencesIf you'd watched him pitch recently, you'd know his velocity was down and something like this was no surprise.
He now has an ERA well over 6 in his last 8 starts, BTW.Comment -
LT ProfitsSBR Aristocracy
- 10-27-06
- 90963
#70WTF does this even mean? What do you mean I lost every play?Originally posted by funnyb25Yet you lost every play. I really am starting to wonder if you even wager real moneyComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
