MLB Sweep System 2015

[hagball52]

MLB Sweep System

I'll update this page tomorrow.

[bravoman81]

question, say you are about to bet a "C" bet but the RL is -220. Do you bet the ML instead to recoup the money lost on bets "A" and "B" or do you adjust your wager amount on the RL to something very heavy to make up the loss?

[cambertos]

Shit, now I have to do a B bet on LAD. Doing a reverse Tony on the unofficial bets.

Damn! the kershaw money line was disgusting!! glad it cashed for you

[takethepnts]

question, say you are about to bet a "C" bet but the RL is -220. Do you bet the ML instead to recoup the money lost on bets "A" and "B" or do you adjust your wager amount on the RL to something very heavy to make up the loss?

Unfortunately, MOST of the 'chase' systems are set up for taking our posted team 'ML' when favoured / +1.5 as the Dog. What you can do to keep costs down if you don't mind 'pushing' the (A) game, is take the -1.0 (For Faves) / +1.0 For Dogs, since you are not trying to recover losses so a push won't hurt you BUT on a loss, your risk was less. After the (A) game, You MUST follow the exact guidelines since a push would leave you down from the previous wagers. That's the long answer. Regardless of the price, You MUST wager ML fave /+1.5 Dog if chasing a loss.Good luck!

[rkelly110]

Damn! the kershaw money line was disgusting!! glad it cashed for you

Thanks man. I bet the run line and cashed.

[bravoman81]

Unfortunately, MOST of the 'chase' systems are set up for taking our posted team 'ML' when favoured / +1.5 as the Dog. What you can do to keep costs down if you don't mind 'pushing' the (A) game, is take the -1.0 (For Faves) / +1.0 For Dogs, since you are not trying to recover losses so a push won't hurt you BUT on a loss, your risk was less. After the (A) game, You MUST follow the exact guidelines since a push would leave you down from the previous wagers. That's the long answer. Regardless of the price, You MUST wager ML fave /+1.5 Dog if chasing a loss.Good luck!

thats what i thought thanks! guess its called chase for a reason!!!

[hagball52]

2015 Allidoiswin89's UNDER/OVER system
Official season series record: 9-2 Units w/l -23.95 (05/08 CLE -16.55, 05/13 WAS -16.40)
Unofficial season series record: 21-0 Units w/l +22.20

Last Play(s) results:
Official
05/16 WAS under (C)WIN (-134)
05/16 BOS over (A) LOSS (-105)

Official Plays
(A) 6-6
(B) 1-4
(C) 1-3
(D) 1-2

Unofficial Plays
(A) 13-9
(B) 4-5
(C) 2-3
(D) 3-0

Next Play(s):
Official
05/17 BOS over (B)

NOTES: We have 3 possible plays going today. One is unofficial.

***** Juice will be posted on the following day based on closing line. The KEY number to follow is the total. Covers.com will be used for closing lines.

Rules of the system can be found on post #14. However, the official season will end July 31 and not August 31.

Disclaimer Notice: Play at your own risk.

[hagball52]

MLB Sweep System
2015 Official season series record 5-0
(A) 3-2
(B) 1-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

Unofficial series 8-0
(A) 5-4
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

Next Plays
Tomorrow

Upcoming plays
05/18 Oakland @ Houston
05/22 Chicago White Sox @ Minnesota
06/08 Milwaukee @ Pittsburgh
06/08 Arizona @ LA Dodgers

Notes: We've got 8 possible sweeps going today with future plays.

The rules are in post #15 and the filters in post #28. Records for the past 3 years can be found in posts #17, #18 & #19. This season we will only be playing the official and unofficial plays according to the rpi rankings at ESPN.

[hagball52]

We will have a Demo bet tomorrow on the Bluejays

[hagball52]

MLB Sweep System
2015 Official season series record 5-0
(A) 3-2
(B) 1-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

Unofficial series 8-0
(A) 5-4
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
05/18 Oakland (.454) @ Houston (.518) +1.5 R/L (A) 3 gm. set

Upcoming plays
05/22 Chicago White Sox @ Minnesota
06/05 Toronto v Houston
06/08 Milwaukee @ Pittsburgh
06/08 Arizona @ LA Dodgers

Notes: We picked up 4 sweeps yesterday.
06/05 TOR v HOU
08/06 MIA @ ATL
08/10 ARI v PHI
09/14 OAK @ CWS

The rules are in post #15 and the filters in post #28. Records for the past 3 years can be found in posts #17, #18 & #19. This season we will only be playing the official and unofficial plays according to the rpi rankings at ESPN.

[hagball52]

2015 Allidoiswin89's UNDER/OVER system
Official season series record: 9-2 Units w/l -23.95 (05/08 CLE -16.55, 05/13 WAS -16.40)
Unofficial season series record: 21-0 Units w/l +22.20

Last Play(s) results:
Official

05/17 BOS over (B) LOSS (-115)

Official Plays
(A) 6-6
(B) 1-5
(C) 1-3
(D) 1-2

Unofficial Plays
(A) 13-9
(B) 4-5
(C) 2-3
(D) 3-0

Next Play(s):
Official
05/19 BOS over (C) These all go tomorrow
05/19 CIN under (A)
05/19 SFO under (A)

NOTES: We have 2 possible plays going tomorrow.

P.S. Just wanted to mention something since I am always looking at systems for new angles. If you had started fading these plays since the official ones started and just flat bet every play you would be 17-11. Just an fyi.

***** Juice will be posted on the following day based on closing line. The KEY number to follow is the total. Covers.com will be used for closing lines.

Rules of the system can be found on post #14. However, the official season will end July 31 and not August 31.

Disclaimer Notice: Play at your own risk.

[hagball52]

The line on that Demo play on Toronto opened at -103 and has moved to +105 so it still qualifies as a play. Even if the line moves out of range but Toronto wins you know who will score it as a win so play it however you want,

P.S. It looks like there might have been a pitching change so the line has moved. Keep an eye on it.

[allidoiswin89]

"P.S. Just wanted to mention something since I am always looking at systems for new angles. If you had started fading these plays since the official ones started and just flat bet every play you would be 17-11. Just an fyi."

Just so I understand correctly, the Cleveland and Washington losses followed by a C and D series count as a record of 13-2?

If so, that logic would only work if we have losses every 4 or 5 plays which I sure as heck hope doesnt happen haha

[hagball52]

"P.S. Just wanted to mention something since I am always looking at systems for new angles. If you had started fading these plays since the official ones started and just flat bet every play you would be 17-11. Just an fyi."

Just so I understand correctly, the Cleveland and Washington losses followed by a C and D series count as a record of 13-2?

If so, that logic would only work if we have losses every 4 or 5 plays which I sure as heck hope doesnt happen haha

I did count their wins on the second series. I don't know where you came up with 13-2. If you look at the A, B, C and D tallies they all add up with the one series pending. Please show me how you got 13-2.

[bravoman81]

The line on that Demo play on Toronto opened at -103 and has moved to +105 so it still qualifies as a play. Even if the line moves out of range but Toronto wins you know who will score it as a win so play it however you want,

P.S. It looks like there might have been a pitching change so the line has moved. Keep an eye on it.

ehhhh Todd Redmond is starting and his numbers are horrid. could be the a double whammy though. Ehh

[hagball52]

I did count their wins on the second series. I don't know where you came up with 13-2. If you look at the A, B, C and D tallies they all add up with the one series pending. Please show me how you got 13-2.

I just went back and looked at my spreadsheet and found that there are 11 wins as opposed to the 9 that I have posted. So I made a mistake somewhere along the line. That week off really messed up my tracking. I don't have time right now but I will go back and get it corrected and fix the post but there are only 11 wins and not 13.

[hagball52]

Right now I've got
(A) 7-7
(B) 2-5
(C) 1-3 (1 series pending BOS)
(D) 1-2

I'll fix it in tomorrow's post

[allidoiswin89]

I did count their wins on the second series. I don't know where you came up with 13-2. If you look at the A, B, C and D tallies they all add up with the one series pending. Please show me how you got 13-2.

Washington and Cleve both lost a series so the fade would be 8-0, no?

Then the 2nd series clev won on C and wash on D so 5-2

For 13-2 total when just looking at that string of games

[hagball52]

Washington and Cleve both lost a series so the fade would be 8-0, no?

Then the 2nd series clev won on C and wash on D so 5-2

For 13-2 total when just looking at that string of games

I think I missed something there. Are we talking apples to oranges. So what you're saying is a fade on those 2 series would be a 13-2 record and I'm saying if you would have faded every single offio system play the record would be 17-11. And the proper system record is 11-2. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[sbutters]

Does anyone have a good bankroll betting strategy using the sweeps system?

[allidoiswin89]

I think I missed something there. Are we talking apples to oranges. So what you're saying is a fade on those 2 series would be a 13-2 record and I'm saying if you would have faded every single offio system play the record would be 17-11. And the proper system record is 11-2. Correct me if I'm wrong.

The point is if u take out the two system losses the fade record would be 4-9...

[imotiv8]

The point is if u take out the two system losses the fade record would be 4-9...

You must not understand what he is talking about....28 games, straight betting every official play, the record would be 17-11

[allidoiswin89]

You must not understand what he is talking about....28 games, straight betting every official play, the record would be 17-11

I do, but clearly your not understanding my point

[Wallco99]

What's not to understand? If I am reading this correctly, you are saying that it takes six men to properly fill a pothole. One guy to pull up in the truck, one guy to rake the tar, two guys to hold a flag, and two other guys to stand and watch. If you were to fade this, it takes only one ice storm to divot the road. Seems pretty clear to me.

[hagball52]

The point is if u take out the two system losses the fade record would be 4-9...

You must not understand what he is talking about....28 games, straight betting every official play, the record would be 17-11

I do, but clearly your not understanding my point

What's not to understand? If I am reading this correctly, you are saying that it takes six men to properly fill a pothole. One guy to pull up in the truck, one guy to rake the tar, two guys to hold a flag, and two other guys to stand and watch. If you were to fade this, it takes only one ice storm to divot the road. Seems pretty clear to me.

I was just trying to make an observation and comment on it. Then it went a little sideways. Both the unofficial and official lost money last year to the tune of around 19 units and this year does not look promising with the 2 May losses but the unofficial has profited this year. I went back and looked at last seasons results and if you would have flat bet all official plays without fading you would have gone 58-51 so overall fading plays is probably not the best way to go. And Wallco, nice explanation....haha

[hagball52]

MLB Sweep System
2015 Official season series record 5-0
(A) 3-2
(B) 1-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

Unofficial series 9-0
(A) 6-4
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
(D) 0-0

*Unofficial*
05/18 Oakland (.454) @ Houston (.518) R/L/M/L (A) WIN

Next Plays
Friday

Upcoming plays
05/22 Chicago White Sox @ Minnesota
06/05 Toronto v Houston
06/08 Milwaukee @ Pittsburgh
06/08 Arizona @ LA Dodgers

Notes: The (A) bet wins make my job easy. Also nice pick up on the Demo win.

The rules are in post #15 and the filters in post #28. Records for the past 3 years can be found in posts #17, #18 & #19. This season we will only be playing the official and unofficial plays according to the rpi rankings at ESPN.

[hagball52]

2015 Allidoiswin89's UNDER/OVER system
Official season series record: 11-2 Units w/l -21.95 (05/08 CLE -16.55, 05/13 WAS -16.40)
Unofficial season series record: 21-0 Units w/l +22.20

Last Play(s) results:
Official

Official Plays
(A) 7-7
(B) 2-5
(C) 1-3
(D) 1-2

Unofficial Plays
(A) 13-9
(B) 4-5
(C) 2-3
(D) 3-0

Next Play(s):
Official
05/19 BOS over (C)
05/19 CIN under (A)
05/19 SFO under (A)

NOTES: We have 5 possible plays going tomorrow. I corrected the results for the official season. I had forgotten to score a couple of wins. I must have missed them while I was away so everything should be accurate now.

***** Juice will be posted on the following day based on closing line. The KEY number to follow is the total. Covers.com will be used for closing lines.

Rules of the system can be found on post #14. However, the official season will end July 31 and not August 31.

Disclaimer Notice: Play at your own risk.

[hagball52]

Looks like another Demo bet tomorrow.

[hagball52]

MLB Sweep System

I'll update this page tomorrow.

[bravoman81]

Looks like another Demo bet tomorrow.

The Marlins it is.

[hagball52]

2015 Allidoiswin89's UNDER/OVER system
Official season series record: 13-2 Units w/l -19.93 (05/08 CLE -16.55, 05/13 WAS -16.40)
Unofficial season series record: 21-0 Units w/l +22.20

Last Play(s) results:
Official
05/19 BOS over (C) LOSS (-125)
05/19 CIN under (A) WIN (-113)
05/19 SFO under (A) WIN (+102)

Official Plays
(A) 9-7
(B) 2-5
(C) 1-4
(D) 1-2

Unofficial Plays
(A) 13-9
(B) 4-5
(C) 2-3
(D) 3-0

Next Play(s):
Official
05/20 BOS over (D)
05/20 CLE over (A)

NOTES: Oh Boy another (D) bet. Three possible plays today.

***** Juice will be posted on the following day based on closing line. The KEY number to follow is the total. Covers.com will be used for closing lines.

Rules of the system can be found on post #14. However, the official season will end July 31 and not August 31.

Disclaimer Notice: Play at your own risk.

[hagball52]

The Marlins it is.

Good job! Does anybody have the real Demo record handy? I think it's 3-2 but not sure. I know the "Champ" is claiming twice as many wins to losses but that's not true.

[liqidzen]

Just wanted to mention hagball, that the first 3 games in the 5 game series must be lost by 2 or more, but the next 2 games can only be a single point loss, in order to qualify for demo. Does that help with your tally? Although he is probably just counting those postponed games due to weather to reach the high total

[hagball52]

Just wanted to mention hagball, that the first 3 games in the 5 game series must be lost by 2 or more, but the next 2 games can only be a single point loss, in order to qualify for demo. Does that help with your tally? Although he is probably just counting those postponed games due to weather to reach the high total

I went back to post #40 and it doesn't mention anything about losses 4 and 5 as far as margin of loss. He is hammering me with emails about there being a play today. So is he manipulating the rules?

[snark]

I'm showing 3-2, +.66 units. 4/20 Mil -109 (L) 4/22 Colo -105 (W) 4/25 Balt -103 (W) 5/2 Colo -125 (L) & Tor -109 (W), with MIA tonight, if it doesn't get out of range.