Originally posted by hyahya
-
Ya it is. Unfortunately technology issues are going to happen. I really think SDQL popularity grew way to fast for them to handle. I mean just the NBA and MLB threads on this site has generated over 120K views this year alone. I can't imagine what the NFL thread is going to do. I have been using SDQL for 4 years now and this is the only time they had issues. They are doing this for free for the most part, so we should cut them a bit of slack. But I will say, it's frustrating when you try to email them and get no response. That burns my ass.Comment -
Site is still down, I wonder if we'll ever be able to use it again.Comment -
Staf wow what a sick pick with the Phils +1.5 and Nats SU very audacious...worked out for you man, props for sure.Comment -
Originally posted by mdunlap3
ya would have loved to see the query..but apparently that is not going to happen. yet sharing seems to be a issue. lolComment -
Lol I definitely messed up bc I thought the Nats won whoooops. Either way, I followed you on the Phil's 1.5 so much love. Jmon- agreed brother I would be ciiised to see his queries, he's been doing well.....any word on the website? Wasn't working for me at my desk today.Comment -
Just sent off an email to the developer, as I have his personal email, hope to get a response. I am assuming it's maintenance gone wrong for the upcoming busiest season, NFL.. Ill let everyone know!Originally posted by mdunlap3Comment -
Bet. That's what's up bro...everyone should join the google group. That's a great idea to keep it going man...I joined it along with one other I believe. It's called SBR SDQL.Originally posted by JMonComment -
Any professionals in this thread /w linkedin?Comment -
Looks like we are up and running!!!Comment -
love it.Originally posted by JMonComment -
32 160
chisox
30 450
indians
29 550
orioles
34 315
royals
35 190
marlins
29 270
under brew
33 440
under nats
under cards
under rangers
35 250
pirates
33 350
angels
27.5 500
under cubs
31 350
nats
40 130
angels
29 200
bosox
35 415
rangers
36 330
under braves
8 1400
astros
rays
27 850
under nats
43 45
angels
21 70
jays
35 220
under A's
35 250
pirates
20 200
tigers
28.5 200
bosox
29.5 450
indians
32.5 480
chisox
31 520
under cubs
29 500
orioles
24 380
under brew
20 900
under angels
20 260
dodgersComment -
A scary query.
D and starter wins - o:starter wins < -8 and s:W and os:L and oss:W and o:starter rest < 8 and SG < 4 and season > 2011Comment -
First play: ( Bases ) Thankfully site working again!!
Under 7.5 -105 Cubs vs Reds
season > 2008 and H and 10 > month > 5 and SG < 4 and 5 > streak > -5 and 1 > tA(HR) > .7 and s:SRA < 6 and p:hits < 11 and 16 > op:hits > 4 and sss:SRA < 4 and rest = 0 and p:home runs < 2 and os:SSO < 11 and oss:SSO < 10 and os:SHA < 11 and 2 < oss:SHA < 11 and p:IT < 6 and p:LOB < 21 and s:SPT < 122 and ss:SPT < 119 and team != Rockies and team != Athletics and o:team != Blue Jays and (p:errors + pp:errors + ppp:errors + pppp:errors + ppppp:errors + pppppp:errors) < 10 and (op:errors + opp:errors + oppp:errors + opppp:errors + oppppp:errors + opppppp:errors) < 8 and (p:temperature < 91 or p:temperature = Indoors)Comment -
Second play: ( Bases or JMon )
Under 8.5 +105 Athletics vs Astros
H and 9.5 > total > 7.5 and SG = 3 and SGS < 6 and playoffs = 0 and 73 < os:SPT < 109 and o:starter rest > 6 and month != 6 and 2 < p:hits < 16 and 1 < tA(doubles, N=10) < 2.3Comment -
Wow nice results! Good work!Originally posted by tarosillComment -
Third play : ( Bases )
Cleveland Indians - 184
Cleveland RL -115
tA(BPRA) < oA(BPRA) and SG = 2 and s:SRA < 5 and 8 > ss:SRA > 0 and (s:SHA + s:SWA) < 12 and os:SHRA > 0 and oss:SHRA < 2 and (game number < 41 or 87 > game number > 61 or 103 > game number > 90 or game number > 130) and op:HR < 4 and op:hits < 14 and p:margin > -7 and -10 < pp:margin < 9 and -10 < opp:margin < 9 and streak > -4 and tA(hits, N=10) > 8.1 and oA(runs, N=10) < 5.3 and -243 < line < 165 and s:SPT > 76 and os:SPT > 66 and SGS < 5 and oA(doubles, N=10) < 2.6 and tA(errors, N=10) < 1.2Comment -
Nice Tarosill!Originally posted by tarosillComment -
Play LAA under
SDQL by bases
H and -7 < ou streak < 2 and -6 < o: ou streak < 2 and SG < 4 and 5 > SGS > 2 and 11.5 > total > 6 and p:hits < 18 and op:hits < 17 and pp:hits < 18 and 3 < ppp:hits < 17 and pppp:hits < 16 and ppppp:hits < 15 and pppppp:hits > 2 and opp:hits < 15 and s:SRA < 5 and 0 < os:SRA < 10 and 2 < s:SHA < 10 and s:SHRA < 2 and os:SHRA < 3 and os:SWA < 7 and s:SSO > 3 and s:SHF < 33 and 16 < os:SHF < 34 and 73 < os:SPT < 110 and 76 < s:SPT < 117 and starter rest < 13 and o:starter rest < 11 and day != Monday and -22.5 < tS(ou margin, N=6) < 10.5 and -15 < oS(ou margin, N=6) < 18.5 and ss:SRA < 6 and ss:SHA > 2 and ss:SSO > 1 and ss:SHF > 19 and oss:SHF < 32 and 4 < s:starter rest < 9 and os:starter rest < 22 and game number < 154 and tS(O, N=10) < 7 and 23 < tS(runs, N=10) < 63 and 36 < tS(hits, N=6) < 65 and 1 < oS(errors, N=10) < 10 and team=AngelsComment -
Another supporting CLE.
Good luck.
AF and total>7 and p:SII>=4 and p:hits>12 and WP>50 and season>=2011 and pp:SII<4 and conference=ALComment -
Play LAA and DET
SDQL
line >= 115 and 100.0 * starter wins / (starter losses + starter wins) >= 70 and o:STDSWHIP <= 1.30 and o:conference = AL and A and month != 5Comment -
Add SG=3 and take see the record for who wins SU.Originally posted by JMonComment -
Nice...supports my LAA pick aboveOriginally posted by emceeayeComment -
support for cubs RL and cubs/reds under
I think this one is Jmon's:
A and 170 >= line >= 110 and po:runs = 0 and p:runs + po:runs <= 3 and rest < 2
Add SG=2 and day=Wednesday.... see over/under recordComment -
I know it's a bit late but at least provides a bit more reassurance on a pirates play...wish I saw it earlier to post.Originally posted by tarosill
I'm not sure who's this is, maybe Jmon's or mine:
H and tA(W) >= .45 and p:margin >= 2 and 32 > tS(runs@team and season,N=6) > 29 and po:BL = 0 and 120 > line >= -216 and conference = o:conference and total <= 10 and SG > 1 and game number > 11 and playoffs = 0 and s:SPT < 118 and os:SPT > 85 and 6.5 < oA(hits, N=10) < 10.8
Add SG=3 and then month=8...a trend to the under shows up as well.Comment -
I went with the initial query. Good enough so far! Thanks emceeaye!Originally posted by emceeayeComment -
Here's another one of mine playing the Cubs. Note spaces o:Originally posted by emceeaye
site = away and 105 <= line <= 180 and po: points < p: points and Sum(o: points < points@team and season, N=10) >= 5 and o:starter throws = R and po:starter throws = R and division = o:division and total < 11 and (day != Saturday and day != Sunday) and rest = 0 and SG < 3 and conference = NLComment -
Hey I been following this thread last week. I wish I understand what you guys are doing but you are doing a great thing for this site I am sure. It would be nice to learn what all this mumbo jumbo means. I dont do o/u but I see the 3 games you are taking team wise are Indians,Tigers and Angels. All have high juice and if one losses and 2 win its basically a squash. Does this formula take the ml into the equation?Comment -
Site appears to be down again...?Comment -
Not for me, but maybe a little slowOriginally posted by mdunlap3Comment -
what site are you guy referring too?Comment -
marlins su
Wish I didnt find this but might still play Angels because not that great...
Not sure whose it is:
s:SIP = 9.0 and starter rest = 6 and 9 > s:SHA > 2 and s:SRA < 2 and s:SSO < 9 and line < 121 and SGS != 2 and day != SundayComment -
Did anyone see the guy from Seattle get yanked mid count? I don't even recall last time that happened lol. 10 ER in 3 IP hahahComment -
woot...I'm on TexOriginally posted by mdunlap3
Comment -
friend...google SDQL. This is the language we are using; looking at past situations/spots to predict future results.Originally posted by rov4lifeComment -
Jmon thanks I've seen you use this language program whatever and would like to understand it. So tonight you're on tigers Indians and angels ?Comment
