Why does Fed get a hard draw and Nadal gets a CAKE WALK draw???

[baskets]

Happens every slam. It's ridiculous.



Fed plays Karlovic / (Tomic/Dolgo) / Del Potro / Nadal / Djokovic

the last 4 rounds of the tourney Fed has to play FOUR slam winners (Tomic/Dolgo will pick one up in the future).


Nadal plays Lacko / Lopez / (Almgro/Brdych) / Fed / Djokovic

Lacko + Lopez + Berdych = what a joke. On a great day, Brdych could beat Rafa.... but come on. Fed's draw is ridiculous.


And there should be some inside favortism by the tournament organizers with all the rigged draws. You should put Rafa on the same side as Djokovic. This would give a fantastic shot at Djoker vs. Federer. Instead, Nadal will work Fed's asshole in the semis and Fed will cry his way off the court.

Fukcing tournament organizers.

[Optional]

There is a good explanation of why this isn't the tourney organizers fault here: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9153036AAkg8Jp

"the thing with the seedings in grand slams is that 1st and 2nd seeds have fixed positions in the draw, ie. 1st seed at the very top and 2nd seed at the very bottom.

the other seeds from 3-32 are randomly drawn.

this is how the seedings are drawn into the draw:

all unseeded players are drawn first into the 96 unseeded places in the 128-field draw.

seeds 17-32 are randomly drawn into the 3rd round brackets, so that means any player (whether seeded or unseeded) does not meet a seeded player until the 3rd round.

seeds 9-16 are randomly drawn into the 4th round brackets

seeds 5-8 are randomly drawn into the QF round brackets

seeds 3-4 are drawn into the SF round brackets

so, with seeds 3 and 4, whichever is drawn first out of the hat or machine that is used for the draw will play against the 1st seed, eg. if 3rd seed is drawn first, he/she plays the 1st seed, and then the 4th seed will play the 2nd seed.

and vice versa if 4th seed is drawn first instead of the 3rd seed.

for every grand slam every year, it is randomly drawn, although i agree with u that sometimes it is very coincidental that u have the same seedings being paired together.

eg. wimbledon 2007, 2008- mens SF have been 1 vs 3, 2 vs 4
eg. us open 2007, 2008- mens SF have been 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3
but, it does change, eg. aus open 2008- mens SF were 1 vs 3, 2 vs 4
BUT... aus open 2009- mens SF were 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3"

[baskets]

draws have always been rigged despite what they say

[Optional]

Don't really know. But I prefer to think you're wrong about that.

[face]

federer is happy watching this dolgopolov/tomic 5 setter

[baskets]

Rigged organizers screwed this up again.

Nadal will no way in hell beat Djoker. Fed will no way in hell beat Nadal. Only Fed can beat Djoker. So we get a Nadal/Djoker final.... and it's Djoker all the way.

So this Aussie open is over.

[baskets]

what a joke this is.

Fed vs. Tomic.... then against DelPo

meanwhile

Nadal 3-0 > Lopez ... then against Berdych (10-0 last 10) / Almagro (7-0 lifetime)


If Fed wins this slam, has to be one of his greatest wins ever... beating potentially four slam winners in his last 4 matches to get the title.

[LovetoSpooge]

to be the best you've got to beat the best

[baskets]

this is how it will likely end. Fed likely crumble like a bitch to Rafa, but as a fan I just can't not put Fed in there.... but most likely Rafa will work Fed's anus on world television yet again



Djoker........ Djoker..........Djoker
Ferrer

Murray........Murray
Tsonga
___________________________________Djoke r > Fed

Delpo
Fed.............Fed...............Fed

Birdy
Nadal..........Nadal