is it stupid to bet Nadal -440?

[Vaioice]

honest question... don't hate

[horja1]

not really ... but it would be stupid to bet Federer -3500

[samus82]

I think its a bad idea only because Del Potro can be very dangerous. He can play on this surface and is a grand slam winner so you can't doubt he is capable of winning this match.

I still think Nadal will win though. Del Potro is in questionable condition and his consistancy will probably let him down across 5 sets, but for the odds on offer there is little value.

[Vaioice]

thx, Nadal 428 to win 100 it is.

[Astros148]

thx, Nadal 428 to win 100 it is.

why would you take this bet?

[gti175]

why would you take this bet?

whole lot of juice buddy.. I think your in for some suffering..

[PickApprentice]

I am with you on this one, think Nadal is going to win

[BallDontLie]

value is in del porto

[MCherry281]

Nadal will win. Del Potro can only beat him on hard courts.

[yisman]

yes

[BallDontLie]

Nadal will win. Del Potro can only beat him on hard courts.

isnt Nadal the hard court expert?

[qukubau]

nadal will win. i think only federer can beat him on grass.

[PickApprentice]

[yisman]

isnt Nadal the hard court expert?

No, he's the clay court expert.

[fixxer]

The ankle injury of Nadal can cost him the Wimbledon title....he was moving far slower, which was enough against Del Potro....but won't be enough against Murray/Fedex/Djoko....the question is, can they fix his ankle, or not...