Federer -275
vs J.M Del Potro
I really, REALLY think this line closes over -300 at Pinnacle. Furthermore, this line will be ridiculous at recreational shops, so don't even bother taking a look at it unless you're lowering your stake size.
You might remember Federer defeating Del Potro 63 60 60 in the Aussie, and also for being 5-0 lifetime versus the youngster, which is kind of irrelevant because of Potro's youth in some of those matches. Even still, he's quite young and certainly outclassed against Federer, but he figures to give a better account of his skill in this match than in years past.
I still don't think all of the above will be enough for him to grab even a set against the 13 time Slam winner. The path is totally clear for Fed.
PLAYS FOR SEMI FINALS
Federer -275 *2 units*
Gonzalez -125 *1 unit*
Stosur +4.5 +113 *1 unit*
Stosur OVER 20.5 +103 *1 unit*
Cibulkova +465 *1 unit*
vs J.M Del Potro
I really, REALLY think this line closes over -300 at Pinnacle. Furthermore, this line will be ridiculous at recreational shops, so don't even bother taking a look at it unless you're lowering your stake size.
You might remember Federer defeating Del Potro 63 60 60 in the Aussie, and also for being 5-0 lifetime versus the youngster, which is kind of irrelevant because of Potro's youth in some of those matches. Even still, he's quite young and certainly outclassed against Federer, but he figures to give a better account of his skill in this match than in years past.
I still don't think all of the above will be enough for him to grab even a set against the 13 time Slam winner. The path is totally clear for Fed.
PLAYS FOR SEMI FINALS
Federer -275 *2 units*
Gonzalez -125 *1 unit*
Stosur +4.5 +113 *1 unit*
Stosur OVER 20.5 +103 *1 unit*
Cibulkova +465 *1 unit*