ATP Stuttgart - Roger Federer to win future

[gambleForLife]

-134 odds @ Pinnacle, lot of juice, but this tournament it's entirely on his racket. The 2 biggest threats are perennial losers to Fed (Dimitrov and Berdych). He can play Haas at first round, which would be a difficult match 2-3 years ago, now I don't think nearly-40 Haas can threaten Fed. And he may even lose to Herbert.

Fed is well rested after skipping the clay season, I don't usually bet much future bets, but I think there's good value.

[gaebiskon]

why is fed that high in the first place?

[gambleForLife]

Down to -151, that was fast.

[gorwin068]

why is fed that high in the first place?

it's just a ATP 250 tournament, the lowest one in ATP excluding Challenger event. Most top players just treat it for practicing.
And possibly because this is Fed's first tournament after winning Aus Open.

[gambleForLife]

it's just a ATP 250 tournament, the lowest one in ATP excluding Challenger event. Most top players just treat it for practicing.
And possibly because this is Fed's first tournament after winning Aus Open.

Actually, after Miami, but still, it was a long time ago.
Anyway, line is up to -172 now, I think the value is gone.

[gaebiskon]

wait, doesn't fed usually show up even for small tourneys unlike some top players?

[Tmuston Beltics]

Federer losing after winning first set to Haas is something I could not have thought to happen. After first set you could bet like 45k in live bet to win 200.

[gambleForLife]

Well, that was over quick lol, hope no one tailed.

[Jinge]

Losing to 39 y.o. Haas with a set and a break up on grass has to be one of his most pathetic performance in his career

[STAY STRONG]

FedEX is no match for 82 year old Haas.

[gorwin068]

that's why i suggested not to go for outright winner with big name in such low tier tournament...

[JC1186]

that's why i suggested not to go for outright winner with big name in such low tier tournament...

Would you pay attention to a post that also said it's Fed's first tournament back since winning the AO?
I know I wouldn't.

Anyway Haas played damn well. Good on him.

[gorwin068]

Would you pay attention to a post that also said it's Fed's first tournament back since winning the AO?
I know I wouldn't.

Anyway Haas played damn well. Good on him.

Sorry mate, not too sure what you meant by
"Would you pay attention to a post that also said it's Fed's first tournament back since winning the AO?
I know I wouldn't. "

[JC1186]

Sorry mate, not too sure what you meant by
"Would you pay attention to a post that also said it's Fed's first tournament back since winning the AO?
I know I wouldn't. "

Your words, not fine.

C'mon man you have Fed in your Avatar and the GOAT has had an amazing year so far.

I've got a feeling you know very well Fed won the Sunshine double in IW and Miami (I mean which tennis fan/punter wouldn't?) , but for whatever reason you wrote it's his first tournament since the AO win.

A brainfart perhaps?

[gorwin068]

Your words, not fine.

C'mon man you have Fed in your Avatar and the GOAT has had an amazing year so far.

I've got a feeling you know very well Fed won the Sunshine double in IW and Miami (I mean which tennis fan/punter wouldn't?) , but for whatever reason you wrote it's his first tournament since the AO win.

A brainfart perhaps?

Oh yea, I made a mistake there, my bad.
But I saw that another mate gambleForLife has corrected me right below that post already, so I didn't correct it again...

But anyway, it wasn't related to my later comment on "not going for outright winner with big name in low tier tournament..."
it is usually not worth betting on it...(my own suggestion)

[jtoler]

Dang think Fed was like -1400 against Haas.