Let's Pick us some winners.

[matt1216]

Lucie! Lucie! Let's go baby take this match as well!

[SteveKerrsJunk]

all day matt, all fukkin day baby!

[matt1216]

Yes sir!

[matt1216]

Georges ML 2.62 x 50$
Stephens +5.5 Games 1.80 x 75$

[lucasdawg]

on mitu ??

[matt1216]

on mitu ??

No, van Ultvnack or nothing

[lucasdawg]

haha as soon as i live chardy, hes down the break standarddddd

[matt1216]

Chardy Set 4 ML 3.75 x 50$ * Murray up 2-1 sets intermission

[matt1216]

Let's go Chardy!

[matt1216]

Bacinchsky + 2.5 Games 1.80 x 60$

[matt1216]

42-68 -810$

[felix_felicus7]

42-68 -810$

??
Might need to update the iphone calculator app.
-74.50 since last grading
42-69, -924

[matt1216]

??
Might need to update the iphone calculator app.
-74.50 since last grading
42-69, -924

-30$ish I don't count live wagers, only thought out prewagers. No point in counting live wagers when people can't fade/follow in time

[felix_felicus7]

21-35 -279$

** Cashed out Jakpovic up 6-4 4-0 114$/129$ possible return... Up 6-4 5-0 ... And lost second set 7-5.... Yeah right

No offence but that's cherry picking. If you counted THE ABOVE then you def count that chardy live bet. I'll hazard a guess that if it had won then you would've counted it. This thread is solely about your bets in bold, not about the potential record of people tailing you (who haven't noticed the last 10+ tennis threads), no?

[matt1216]

Bester/Chen Over 21.5 Games 1.90 x 90$

[fitguy67]

felix makes a good point...

decide to count OR not to count extra-curricular, hence un-followable live shit
(hint: it's clearly best to decide to NOT count as you rightly point out in #258)...

then stick with it...a record's gotta be "warts and all" and consistent as to what's in and what's out

[matt1216]

I see what you both are saying. I'm not even sure why I put that in their. I've never counted live wagers

[SirtySree]

You were pretty content with keeping it in there when I called you out about it even after the fact the live hedge was posted after your original bet was about to lose.

We all know the real reason why you counted that and not the above.

[matt1216]

You were pretty content with keeping it in there when I called you out about it even after the fact the live hedge was posted after your original bet was about to lose.

We all know the real reason why you counted that and not the above.

I have no problem subtracting it from my wins or money made.

[matt1216]

Mugaruza ML 1.90 x 100$
Svitolina +3.5 Games 1.90 x 60$

[fitguy67]

gl today, sir...quarters, semis, and final are easy to watch and hard to bet

[matt1216]

Thanks Fitguy, you as well

[matt1216]

Svitolina +3.5 Games 1.90 x 40$* see above
Pavlasek ML 2.75 x 50$

[matt1216]

- Sarkissian ML 1.80 x 60$

[matt1216]

- Wolmarans ML 2.25 x 50$

[matt1216]

- Duck Lee/Niki Over 21.5 Games 1.90 x 60$

[matt1216]

- Kravchuck ML 1.90 x 70$

[girlscoutcookies]

blackhawks large or what??

[matt1216]

blackhawks large or what??

No, feel it out game. Chicago should win but they maybe hung over from that win in Anahiem. TB's in the similar situation but they didn't have that stress of having to win two straight games.

[matt1216]

- Ji Sung Nam ML 2.25 x 50$
- Bester ML 1.66 x 100$

[matt1216]

- Li/Sarkissian Under 21.5 Games 1.80 x 60$
- Oconell/Niki Under 21.5 Games 1.83 x 60$

[matt1216]

- Krajinovic ML 2.62 x 50$

[matt1216]

- Bolleli/Fognini ML 2.75 x 100$
- Safarova ML 1.72 x 120$

[matt1216]

- Safarova -2.5 Games 1.90 x 100$

[matt1216]

- Hemery ML 2.25 x 60$