Let's Pick us some winners.

[AceAce]

Keep Grindin Matty

[matt1216]

- Voracova ML 2.25 x 30.00$

- Koukalova 2-0 sets x 30.00$

- Connor Smith ML 2.00 x 30.00$


GL

[sluggy1616]

Hey Matt,

I came up with a little computer logic method that has really helped improve my betting results and I know will work for you too:

:reference Kenz bankroll thread
:If new play in kenz thread
:then copy play
:else make no play

Rinse and repeat and your back on your feet in no time.

[matt1216]

- no offense to anyone, But I try to make my own plays.

[matt1216]

* Koukalova 2-0 sets 2.50, Hits.


Fleming/Murray 2.25 x 30.00$


GL

[matt1216]

- Van Utyvnack ML 2.10 x 40.00$

GL

[fitguy67]

I'm starting to notice a huge trend... Not sure why it took so long. I will adjust accordingly. For whatever reason most (elite tennis players) rarely have more than one "garbage" performance in a row. Just think the Books in the "Tennis section" on the men's side would probably be Hit hard if we all followed this. I'm sure a select few are following this on SBR already.

Ex) nishikori vs Djoker at US open. Goes on too lose to Cilic in 3 sets
Ex) Seppi vs Federer at AUS open. I know he didn't go far afterwards.
Ex) Fognini vs Nadal a month or two back, shits the bed hard next match.

And there's a ton more that I'm forgetting, same applies on the challenger side

matt, please apply said revelation ASAP...

[matt1216]

Yeah the above doesn't apply until further into the tournament. Been a bumpy road, look at how many 3 setters I have lost, wtf. I have to boost my Karma, I believe.

[matt1216]

2-8 in 3 setters 2 voided matches that I would have won. Lol.

[matt1216]

10-27 -665$

[felix_felicus7]

Forget about 'luck' & the 3 setters that haven't gone your way. Believe only in cause and effect. What confuses me is why you say 'GL' after each tip as if you believe others should be tailing?

[matt1216]

Forget about 'luck' & the 3 setters that haven't gone your way. Believe only in cause and effect. What confuses me is why you say 'GL' after each tip as if you believe others should be tailing?

Jeez Felix, I do it because I believe in good karma. This will turn around, only a matter of time.

[matt1216]

- Yee Rae Lee ML 2.62 x 60$

[sunkist]

Forget about 'luck' & the 3 setters that haven't gone your way. Believe only in cause and effect. What confuses me is why you say 'GL' after each tip as if you believe others should be tailing?

I been occasionally tailing. At least when his picks match up with something I'm already looking at. Not sure why you would have a problem with that?

[fitguy67]

matt...anyway you can get ok for receiving a PM?

[matt1216]

Hey man, no they won't let me, not sure why, I read your last message. I agree with a lot of things that you discussed. My email is spivy43_41@hotmail.com

[matt1216]

- Setkic ML 2.37 x 50.00$

- Karatsev + Bagnis 2.25 x 50$

[matt1216]

- Youhzny ML 2.50 x 50$

[fitguy67]

matt, i got it, but you better edit your post #86 above right away to remove your e-addy...before somebody quotes it and it's locked in...big-brother SBR will penalize you for it

________
Chicago Blackhawks now (pre-g2) +170 to win series great value IMO...period of everything falling Ducks' way about to end...i actually hope, though, that Anaheim manages to go up 2-0 and sweeten the payout even more and i can add a second chunk of $-targeted for a fractional added risk

[matt1216]

matt, i got it, but you better edit your post #86 above right away to remove your e-addy...before somebody quotes it and it's locked in...big-brother SBR will penalize you for it

________
Chicago Blackhawks now (pre-g2) +170 to win series great value IMO...period of everything falling Ducks' way about to end...i actually hope, though, that Anaheim manages to go up 2-0 and sweeten the payout even more and i can add a second chunk of $-targeted for a fractional added risk

Thanks Fitguy, I'll look into it... Don't take the Hawks man, this is a major mismatch. The Hawks barely got by a weak nashville(mentally).... Dubnyk was exhausted for minny. Chicago did a good job containing them but I firmly believe Minnesota was tired. Anahiem is a much bigger team, plus Chicago is beat up. The perry getzlaf line will take Chicago on the boards all day. Kessler is shutting down towes, I like Anahiem in 5 or 6 here. Fitguy, I'll be laying a bunch on Tampa game 3 and 4.... Washington lost to NYR but they won the war.... NYR is exhausted

[fitguy67]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3097623-news-flash-stanley-cup-not-won-years-best-team.html

i started to respond to your observations about Ana and Tam being the less banged-up teams in the hunt...and ended up with a post better suited elsewhere...

[matt1216]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3097623-news-flash-stanley-cup-not-won-years-best-team.html

i started to respond to your observations about Ana and Tam being the less banged-up teams in the hunt...and ended up with a post better suited elsewhere...

you have my email.... Send me a message, I want you to watch something for next year in the NHL, you will soon find out why I have a dencent bankroll.... Now I just need to skip Monday's in tennis... It's killed my profit.

[fitguy67]

the p2tot bet based on the p1tot , right?

[matt1216]

the p2tot bet based on the p1tot , right?

Yes, during the regular season. You have a solid memory, Sir. I haven't tested the playoffs, though.

tonights the first time in a long time that I broke down my tennis matches in depth... This should make a huge difference. I had a flashback to Two years ago, let's get er done

[matt1216]

10-30 -815$

[fitguy67]

let's run that baby from start of next season...it was basically to play the under on the same number that the over just hit in the first period (or was it just the opposite...i do remember it was fading the second period to repeat the first, total-wise, right?)

[matt1216]

- Yee Rae Lee ML 2.62 x 60$

Holly sweet cream on an ice cream sandwich, I finally won

[matt1216]

let's run that baby from start of next season...it was basically to play the under on the same number that the over just hit in the first period (or was it just the opposite...i do remember it was fading the second period to repeat the first, total-wise, right?)

It has to be a 2-1 score first period. From what I remember the odds in the second period were not affected

[matt1216]

11-30 -718$

[matt1216]

- Delbonis/Kuznetsov Over 21.5 Games 1.83 x 50$
- Thiem ML 2.10 x 50$
- Ghem ML 2.37 x 50$
- Nishioka ML 2.00 x 75$
- Fabbiano ML 1.72 x 50$

[matt1216]

- Fabbiano + Herbert 3.20 x 25$

[PharaohUB]

- Fabbiano + Herbert 3.20 x 25$

Vanni played some solid tennis this year. Why you like Fabbiano so much?

[girlscoutcookies]

Vanni played some solid tennis this year. Why you like Fabbiano so much?

guessing cuz he's a dog when most think he shouldn't be

[matt1216]

guessing cuz he's a dog when most think he shouldn't be

Yeah I thought the books knew something I didn't here. I realized shortly after I believe Vanni somewhat excels on a slower clay

[matt1216]

14-32 -618$

- Nguyen ML 1.57 x 60$
- Ji Sung ML 2.37 x 40$