I will keep a record of my tennis plays in this thread. Mostly there will be no comments, i will only post my picks.
BOL
BOL
-
-
#1
WTA Tennis 162 Sabine Lisicki -200* vs Alexandra Dulgheru
(Risking 2.00 to win 1.00)Comment -
#2
WTA Tennis 157 Julia Goerges -240* vs Alla Kudryavtseva
(Risking 2.40 to win 1.00)
#3
WTA Tennis 106 Lin Zhu +130* vs Yuliya Beygelzimer
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.30)Comment -
Adding,
#4
WTA Tennis 349 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova -245* vs Anna Schmiedlova
(Risking 2.45 to win 1.00)
#5
WTA Tennis 341 Lesia Tsurenko -165* vs Shelby Rogers
(Risking 1.65 to win 1.00)
#6
WTA Tennis 309 Kristina Mladenovic +130* vs Tereza Smitkova
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.30)Comment -
#7
WTA Tennis 137 Qiang Wang -115* vs Magda Linette
(Risking 1.15 to win 1.00)Comment -
#8
Qualifying Tennis 1604 Urszula Radwanska -125* vs Richel Hogenkamp
(Risking 1.25 to win 1.00)
#9
Qualifying Tennis 1602 Kateryna Bondarenko +115* vs Timea Babos
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.15)
#10
Challenger Tennis 1203 Aslan Karatsev -150* vs Gregoire Barrere
(Risking 1.50 to win 1.00)
#11
WTA Tennis 347 Y.Wickmayer Games Won +5 -118* vs T.Bacsinszky Games Won
(Risking 1.18 to win 1.00)
#12
WTA Tennis 333 Daniela Hantuchova +145* vs Monica Puig
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.45)Comment -
#13
3 Team Parlay
WTA Tennis 313 Vera Zvonareva -145* vs Alison Riske
WTA Tennis 154 Jarmila Gajdosova -220* vs Cagla Buyukakcay
WTA Tennis 349 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova -250* vs Anna Schmiedlova
(Risking 1.00 to win 2.44)
#14
WTA Tennis 327 A-S.Sanchez Games Won +6½ -110* vs P.Hercog Games Won
(Risking 1.10 to win 1.00)Comment -
Nice thread. Good luck going forwardComment -
Hi, I see way too much WTA. This will f you up in the long run.Comment -
Is there some atp he could be betting instead?Comment -
Way too many picks to be profitable long term whether it be wta or ATP or any other sport for that matterComment -
is ATP much different than WTA lately ??? WTA is actually a gold mine, if you know where to dig.Originally posted by Tmuston Beltics
I believe it is one of the many myths that are being told in this business. No real proof.Originally posted by HatersGonnaHate
Lots of deception in the business which you may get caught either when you bet few or many.Comment -
Not a myth at all. There is a reason that most professional betters/cappers chose only a few games. People are seldom if ever successful betting 10+ matches a day like you are trying to do. This is even a slow week for tennis and you have a ton of picks. What's going to happen on a week where there is 3atp 3wtA and a couple challenger tourneys going. 40 picks?? Just advice dude long term you are not going to most likely have successComment -
Originally posted by HatersGonnaHate
What i know is if you keep your bankroll increasing, you are doing the right thing. You may do this by finding the edges with few bets, and wagering bigger, or by doing it smaller bets, and risking less units. Until this point i agree with you, analyzing and finding the edges for few games are easier, since you can study each game in a more focused way. You do not shoot too many bullets, few but aim them better. Everything is logical if things happen naturally.
But the interesting thing is, this business is not built on the natural happening of things.
It is based on the aim of making some "group of people" richer. These people can be named as bookmakers and the unknown others. and they manipulate.
But i am sure both you and me , and also our friend Cappinpicks, who nominated your post, are not among these "group of people".
There is manipulation in some serious number of events, in all types of sports. This manipulation may occur in a very minor challenger event where a few spectators may see which in case needs not to much care of how it is performed, or it may occur in a GS final, where millions are watching, with a top class acting of the people.
We are all here to find a way of getting benefit as a side effect of this interesting business. If we are successful, we may earn some, and entertain ourselves, betting responsibly... If we can not we will be the victims of this business.
You can do this having a system of your own, where you try to minimize your losses (these losses may be result of your poor prediction, or a surprise result, or because of a manipulation) and compensate these losses with your wins.
While doing so, you may do whatever you want, bet once in a day, or bet dozens. You are doing the right thing,as long as you have a steady increase in your bankroll.
So please do not tell me the things which can be called as "basic instructions of betting" as if you are very wise, and as if i need you to enlighten me. I am sure most of the people already know themComment -
Well only one way to prove me wrong. Keep posting your plays and see what happens. Maybe you will prove me wrong and maybe you won't. Time will tell. I will give you kudos for sure if you can keep winning making that many picksComment -
Originally posted by makmanOriginally posted by makmanW/L/P: 1/2/0Originally posted by makman
Pending:11 (#1,3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12,13,14)
Profit: -1.65Comment -
I do not have to prove you anything.Originally posted by HatersGonnaHate
There will be no proof of anything.
If i make profit, will you be convinced that you are wrong??? or vice versa ???
Everything is about predicting the winners, and winning more than you lose.
If you already are sure that you will make profit in the long term, by betting few, i envy you. Go and make profit.
Betting few, or betting dozens are not choices of which is better
Neither is better.
You have to pick the winners, that is betterComment -
#15
WTA Tennis 332 M.Rybarikova Games Won -5 -115* vs J.Jaksic Games Won
(Risking 1.15 to win 1.00)Comment -
1% chance of that happening in this thread though.Originally posted by makman
You're chopping more wood than Paul Bunyan.
Insane.
Odds are you aren't betting much real money so it won't matter when this thread goes under within the week, and if not a week possibly 2 or 3 if you catch a massive run of chalk hitting.
And that's not criticism, I wish you luck, just a fact of betting -240 numbers with straight bets nonstop.
When you're laying wood like that, you have to at least parlay them.
Even then, you're gonna need to go 2-0 to get an even money payout, but the risk isn't as massive compared to losing a straight bet.
If you're taking 90% favs you may as well just in-game and hope they fall behind a game early then pounce.
GL
Comment -
W/L/P: 2/2/0Originally posted by makman
Pending:11 (#1,4,5,6,8,9,11,12,13,14,15)
Profit: -0.35Comment -
Thanks.Originally posted by BennyBigNuts1% chance of that happening in this thread though.
You're chopping more wood than Paul Bunyan.
Insane.
Odds are you aren't betting much real money so it won't matter when this thread goes under within the week, and if not a week possibly 2 or 3 if you catch a massive run of chalk hitting.
And that's not criticism, I wish you luck, just a fact of betting -240 numbers with straight bets nonstop.
When you're laying wood like that, you have to at least parlay them.
Even then, you're gonna need to go 2-0 to get an even money payout, but the risk isn't as massive compared to losing a straight bet.
If you're taking 90% favs you may as well just in-game and hope they fall behind a game early then pounce.
GL
I sometimes do not parlay solid bets, even with odds down to -250/-300.
In-game live betting, i do a lot
, a good way of making money. The odds go insanely high sometimes, i wonder if they are really watching whats going on the court.
Comment -
Pretty sure 95% of it is computerized, there may be slight adjustments for possible injuries though it seems.Originally posted by makmanThanks.
I sometimes do not parlay solid bets, even with odds down to -250/-300.
In-game live betting, i do a lot, a good way of making money. The odds go insanely high sometimes, i wonder if they are really watching whats going on the court.Comment -
Originally posted by makmanOriginally posted by makmanW/L/P: 5/4/0Originally posted by makman
Pending:6 (#4,6,12,13,14,15)
Profit: -0.35Comment -
#16
2 Team Parlay
WTA Tennis 117 Kurumi Nara -175* vs Magda Linette
WTA Tennis 122 Jarmila Gajdosova -320* vs Luksika Kumkhum
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.06)
#17
Challenger Tennis 1307 Enzo Couacaud +115* vs Daniel Brands
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.15)
#18
WTA Tennis 125 Julia Goerges -125* vs Kateryna Kozlova
(Risking 1.25 to win 1.00)
#19
WTA Tennis 364 S.Errani Games Won -4 +100* vs L.Davis Games Won
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.00)Comment -
I nominate Sabine Lisicki and Ana Sofia Sanchez for the "Most Pathetic WTA Performance of the Day" Award
Comment -
You must not be watching this lauren davis matchOriginally posted by makmanI nominate Sabine Lisicki and Ana Sofia Sanchez for the "Most Pathetic WTA Performance of the Day" Award
Comment -
I got Errani -4 gamesOriginally posted by pattymayo
I will give Lauren Davis the award if she retiresComment -
btw is there anywhere stream of this game??
I couldnt findComment -
Originally posted by makmanOriginally posted by makmanOriginally posted by makmanW/L/P: 7/6/0Originally posted by makman
Pending:6 (#4,12,13,16,17,18)
Profit: -0.30Comment -
BOL. No ITF?Comment -
I didnt see any good play yet there. Lots of unknown players to me.Originally posted by SCI
there is enough WTA action to choose fromComment -
Originally posted by makmanOriginally posted by makman
W/L/P: 9/6/0
Pending:4 (#12,16,17,18)
Profit: +3.14Comment -
Originally posted by makman
W/L/P: 10/6/0
Pending:3 (#16,17,18)
Profit: +4.59Comment -
Originally posted by makman
W/L/P: 11/6/0
Pending:2 (#17,18)
Profit: +5.65Comment -
#20
2 Team Parlay
Challenger Tennis 1312 Maxime Teixeira -280* vs Andrea Arnaboldi
ITF Women Tennis 1401 Veronica Cepede Royg -175* vs Rebecca Peterson
(Risking 1.00 to win 1.13)
W/L/P: 11/6/0
Pending:3 (#17,18,20)
Profit: +5.65Comment
