Does Wawrinka Deserve The Australian Open Title?

[ManeOnFire]

Do you guys think Wawrinka would have beat Nadal if Nadal wasn't injured?

[fcmb]

Imo NO & NO

[Demonata]

Yes. He won and was playing great to get to the final so he could of beat him even if nadal was not injured. He didn't play all injured players. He won against other great competition.

[redtagboys]

Hes been garbage since, almost an auto fade past the first/second round in tournaments.

[matt1216]

I'm not sure what u guys are thinking.... He beat Djokovic the best hardcourt player in the world in a 5 setter.... That alone should be the title.

Wawrinka won set 1 when Nadal was not injured. Of course he deserves it...



Does Nadal deserve all the French titles because he played who he played when he played them? Djoker was sick this year for the French open final. It is what it is boys.

[redtagboys]

Djokovic 1-4 last four grand slams. Should be 3-4

[amolg24]

I'm not sure what u guys are thinking.... He beat Djokovic the best hardcourt player in the world in a 5 setter.... That alone should be the title.

Wawrinka won set 1 when Nadal was not injured. Of course he deserves it...



Does Nadal deserve all the French titles because he played who he played when he played them? Djoker was sick this year for the French open final. It is what it is boys.

Don't be fooled by Wawrinka's performance on clay and grass (he wasn't to shabby on grass either) This guy is a MONSTER hard court player. He will come out as his best on the hard court.

[Simon Gruber]

Don't be fooled by Wawrinka's performance on clay and grass (he wasn't to shabby on grass either) This guy is a MONSTER hard court player. He will come out as his best on the hard court.

he won the Monte Carlo masters and made the semis at Queens and quarters at Wimbledon.

[amolg24]

he won the Monte Carlo masters and made the semis at Queens and quarters at Wimbledon.

Okay, but Grand Slams are what count and he sucked in the French.... and my (not too shabby on grass comment referred to his Wimbledon performance)

Anyways, would anyone argue that hard court is his best surface? Its not really debatable if you've watched him play

[EaglesPhan36]

This is like asking if Federer deserves his French Open title because he didn't beat Rafa. Silly.

[ManeOnFire]

This is like asking if Federer deserves his French Open title because he didn't beat Rafa. Silly.

Do you think Wawrinka would have beat an uninjured Nadal?

[EaglesPhan36]

Who knows. Would Djokovic have won Wimbledon against Roger Federer age 29? Hypotheticals can go on all day.

Wawrinka won. That's all that matters to history.