Originally posted by sluggy1616
-
I've bet on it for two years. Coached and played the sport, but I avoid weeks such as these.Comment -
You are wrong again and you are calling names to others. Same link you are giving but it says there:
If one player withdraws or is disqualified after the first set has been completed, the player progressing to the next round or that is awarded the match by the umpire will be considered the winner. If the first set has not been completed, all Match Bets will be void.
In the event of a change to playing surface, venue or change from indoor court to outdoor and vice versa, all bets stand.
If the first set has not been completed, all Match Bets will be void.
Comment -
Originally posted by ClutchOnandWin
And this is the 100th time when you mention you played and coached. We know it by heart already.Comment -
Monfils matchpoint, covered ages ago, but watch this space again lads!
Comment -
When someone says "Welcome to tennis betting", I am oblidged to. Go be a little fanboy now and rim Dimitrova, why don't you?Originally posted by addictedtoComment -
Ladbrokes used to be first ball but switched recently. Apologies go to the nancyboy with hots for wonga. Meanwhile, Monfils finally wrapped it up. Time to smile.
Comment -
Good that you deleted your ridiculous post. Calling names and arguing with everybody.Originally posted by ClutchOnandWinComment -
Monfils barely won against injured Gasquet. Can't wait to see the odds for Brands - Monfils. Respect to Gasquet for staying till the end, U22.½ win.Comment -
Ah... I didn't even bother looking at his source because I knew what he claimed it says is wrong regardless. The source even being up to date and confirming what I was telling him is almost hilariously ironic though. Nice find!Originally posted by addictedto
It's cool though... we all make mistakes. I've had some rough rolls of the dice myself. Bounce back!Comment -
Oh, so how bad was I flamed? I must've just missed it... Damn!Originally posted by addictedtoComment -
Dude, ladbrokes genuinely used to be first ball, they have switched it up recently. The names are part of now and again banter, if you can't handle that part of the world wide web, well, not my problem?Originally posted by addictedto
Anyway, stick to tennis. As I'm getting a bit of the MTF forum fanboy vibe from you.
Hardcoar, laddies genuinely paid out on retirements after the first ball. I specifically remember being on the end of it in a USTA challenger a year back where Russel retired against sock 3 games in. I never heard it changed. No big deal. Meaningless topic.
I deleted the post because I'd looked on the official ladbrokes website and it had indeed changed. Not because that MTF fanboy came to any aid of yours. lol First time I was wrong btw addictedtopoormatchplayers.Comment -
Its all good guys.... Some of these dogs/favs are gonna be hard to predict right away. If your one losing to bad beats, hang in there. It will get better. very early in the year
Comment -
Quite frankly, if you're losing to bad beats, you're an idiot. That "you're" is in most recent case, me. Every "on the verge of winning" bet should be traded/hedged/cashed out. Simply covering is a show of "greed" and lack of "will power" and "humble nature". A small percentage lost if it's a winner compares nothing to the long term affects of being on the wrong end of a maraculous comeback or choke.Originally posted by matt1216
I need to quit being the greeded idiot and act with more business savy.Comment -
Wait so... I came to Addictedto's aid? I'm an MTF fanboy?? Now I'm even more confused!Originally posted by ClutchOnandWinDude, ladbrokes genuinely used to be first ball, they have switched it up recently. The names are part of now and again banter, if you can't handle that part of the world wide web, well, not my problem?
Anyway, stick to tennis. As I'm getting a bit of the MTF forum fanboy vibe from you.
Hardcoar, laddies genuinely paid out on retirements after the first ball. I specifically remember being on the end of it in a USTA challenger a year back where Russel retired against sock 3 games in. I never heard it changed. No big deal. Meaningless topic.
I deleted the post because I'd looked on the official ladbrokes website and it had indeed changed. Not because that MTF fanboy came to any aid of yours. lol First time I was wrong btw addictedtopoormatchplayers.
What were the "names called" and at whom were they called?
Like I already said on the previous page: I agree: You were wrong and it's no big deal – People are wrong all the time. It was fairly amusing under the circumstances you put yourself in, I must admit however.
It's all good. Bounce back tomorrow!Comment -
No. lol Not you.Originally posted by HardcoarWait so... I came to Addictedto's aid? I'm an MTF fanboy?? Now I'm even more confused!
Comment -
Is anyone here unable to cashout bets with Bet365 recently? I'm no longer getting the option? The lengths they will go to. lolComment -
If you have a slight attention to details you would have noticed that the rules were changed in September:Originally posted by ClutchOnandWinDude, ladbrokes genuinely used to be first ball, they have switched it up recently. The names are part of now and again banter, if you can't handle that part of the world wide web, well, not my problem?
Anyway, stick to tennis. As I'm getting a bit of the MTF forum fanboy vibe from you.
Hardcoar, laddies genuinely paid out on retirements after the first ball. I specifically remember being on the end of it in a USTA challenger a year back where Russel retired against sock 3 games in. I never heard it changed. No big deal. Meaningless topic.
I deleted the post because I'd looked on the official ladbrokes website and it had indeed changed. Not because that MTF fanboy came to any aid of yours. lol First time I was wrong btw addictedtopoormatchplayers.
Updated 30/09/13
So, when you argue with somebody at least double check the facts so you don't look too silly. Also I don't even tend to read your long write-ups recently, maybe I get bored after the first 3 words.
@Hardcoar - yes he was calling you somehow but erased it and I don't rememer it. Ask him.Comment -
Or may be, may be, you just own the attention span of a 6 year old after a whole bag of haribo? Or you aren't a tennis fan or follower and instead a twit that attaches himself to players, cacading the bedroom wall with their pictures?Originally posted by addictedtoIf you have a slight attention to details you would have noticed that the rules were changed in September:
Updated 30/09/13
So, when you argue with somebody at least double check the facts so you don't look too silly. Also I don't even tend to read your long write-ups recently, maybe I get bored after the first 3 words.
@Hardcoar - yes he was calling you somehow but erased it and I don't rememer it. Ask him.
It's all good, I wouldn't expect someone that's IQ ranges within the category of retardation to enjoy my prematch reviews. Infact I'd prefer it if they didn't. lolComment -
I'm too technical for you blubber fanboy. You're the type that likes dumbed down, commercial forms of tennis punditary and commentary I can bet. Who's your favourite commentator? Mcenroe, lemme guess? lolComment -
See, that does fascinate me though. If I'm not the MTF-fanboy, and addictedto was the one who received the aid of said fanboy, who the flying f*ck is the MTF-fanboy proper??Originally posted by ClutchOnandWinComment -
Refered to you as the nancyboy.Originally posted by HardcoarComment -
Alas... to think I used to enjoy Haribo.Originally posted by ClutchOnandWin
What do you think about my Radwanska and Ivanovic odds, Clutches'?Comment -
Oh I saw that part, but the post you edited. If there was nothing else I'm inclined to feel flattered rather than offended. I've had compliments that were twice as bad. Not to mention I have it coming with the avatar I chose. After all... such is the life we choose.Originally posted by ClutchOnandWinComment -
Done doing writeups bro. I always thought what I was articulating was both insightful and interesting, but if I'm not the cup of tea most like here, it's better I alter to the more "bystander" role of poster.Originally posted by HardcoarComment -
-
faaaaaaaaaaaaawk!!!Comment -
Haha. We have a solid "connection" in Matty boy!!Comment -
As I've said before, I enjoy your posts, one way or the other. Your main problem is you take people's posts far too seriously. Try caring less what a few random individuals on an internet forum claim to think.Originally posted by ClutchOnandWin
That aside, I wasn't expecting any write-ups. I was expecting an opinion on the related bets as posted in my thread.Comment -
Radwanska cleans up on "wreckless ballbashers" but she's never matched up well with that heavy topspin forehand from Samantha.Originally posted by Hardcoar
I feel Radwanska's added enough weight to her shots now a days to avoid being bombarded though. 1.5 is about right. Ivanovic should win, but haven't seen her play this season thus far.Comment -
That little cretin just has odd taste.Originally posted by Hardcoar
Yeah, I just hate that the nba lot come over here, read a few of the guy's tennis views and then make a thread about a certain pick being a lock. LOL!Comment -
Ok, thanks!Comment -
well fognini's out. Funny how I knew this info yesterday afternoon. Well if I hear anything else through the grape vine I'll post it, no worrysComment -
You knew Butt-Pirate was out yesterday??
Comment -
Originally posted by ClutchOnandWin
Bouchard was smashing the ball vs radwanska but radwanska looked like a female Djokovic putting Rhodes balls ball in play. Becareful I think she will force Stosur into a ton of Unforced errorsComment -
I knew he was INJURED. I was just hoping he would Play. I was seriously going to unload on Bhambri.Originally posted by HardcoarYou knew Butt-Pirate was out yesterday??
Comment
