Return of the King: Picks from the Lips of Stepanek

[stepanekslips]

Bam started the year off right with a >+300 win with Karlovic. Too penetrating easy mate. Now I bless you peasants with a thread of my own.

I see you addicts are in full force spewing lies and just looking plain silly. Papa Stepanek is here to help.

[Simon Gruber]

Glad you're back. Easy fade material.

[stepanekslips]

Glad you're back. Easy fade material.

Here broskii. Only if you bank roll management dough.
13/8
Hanescu beats Sousa.

[ClutchOnandWin]

Show humility.

When people "claim" to be something, they "generally" aren't.

[ClutchOnandWin]

I'm pretty sure you most certainly got the Hanescu pick from the thread I made in effort to egnite/spark debate also. Head back to the NBA section bro, this sport is for the smarter breed of person. Not the passive, excessively alpha male bravado chin wagging show offs.

[Semper Fidelis]

Search his latest posts Clutch and see if you can find his tennis ones. One of the biggest shit-talkers on SBR, and acts like he knows it all. Not surprised at all he starts the thread claiming to have taken Ivo, when there is no evidence whatsoever lol. You'll see soon enough he's average at best - he'll certainly hit some, but loses just as much.

[Hardcoar]

Passive? You appear to have some trouble choosing the proper adjective sometimes, Clutches.

Other than that... I enjoy your contributions, I should probably add. I do my best not to start flame'n'troll-wars with reasonable individuals, you see.

Vamp'Man seems to be in a good spot thus far, by the way. Hope you cash that bet!

[ClutchOnandWin]

No. I don't. He is passive. You STRIKE (not even appear) as having trouble being able to comprehend English, more so roll around from thread to thread, either pointing out the obvious or askkng questions with obvious answers to them, had you only "read" the person's actual post!

BTW.

Passive:

influenced, acted upon, or affected by some external force, cause, or agency; being the object of action rather than causing action (opposed to active ).

Copying my Hanescu pick was passive. Thought bubble*(He's typed a good worded post with decent but not excellent grammar, let me assume he knows what he's blabbering on about and tail)*

Get it?

A better word he could be partly described for being also, vacant.

A quote I like to use with regard to "statistics" like him.

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves… and wiser people so full of doubts.
-Bertrand Russell

[stepanekslips]

I'm pretty sure you most certainly got the Hanescu pick from the thread I made in effort to egnite/spark debate also. Head back to the NBA section bro, this sport is for the smarter breed of person. Not the passive, excessively alpha male bravado chin wagging show offs.

Shush Hogwarts. You might as well be a COW as your name suggests because your rambling is just silly.

[ClutchOnandWin]

Shush Hogwarts. You might as well be a COW as your name suggests because your rambling is just silly.

COW? My little cousin's 10, fairly immature, naturally and yet he wouldn't find that BS funny. You insignificant loser!

I suggest you act your age as opposed to your penis size.

[Hardcoar]

No. I don't. He is passive. You STRIKE (not even appear) as having trouble being able to comprehend English, more so roll around from thread to thread, either pointing out the obvious or askkng questions with obvious answers to them, had you only "read" the person's actual post!

BTW.

Passive:

influenced, acted upon, or affected by some external force, cause, or agency; being the object of action rather than causing action (opposed to active ).

Copying my Hanescu pick was passive. Thought bubble*(He's typed a good worded post with decent but not excellent grammar, let me assume he knows what he's blabbering on about and tail)*

Get it?

A better word he could be partly described for being also, vacant.

A quote I like to use with regard to "statistics" like him.

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves… and wiser people so full of doubts.
-Bertrand Russell

As expected – I must admit – you took that the wrong way entirely. Cool down kid.

Pointing out the obvious where others for one reason or another fail to see it. In that sense, you are correct. It may be obvious to me and presumably some other people, but certainly not to all... That much is clear.

I am a fan of that quote myself. Also, Congrat's on your Hanescu win, and best of luck with your continued efforts.

[stepanekslips]

Dont love the bet here but nice price.
4/6
Flipkens beats Puig.

[stepanekslips]

12/5
Alex Kuznetsov beats Ebden.

12/5
Morita beats Safarova.

[stepanekslips]

4/6
Lopez beats Kukushkin.

[stepanekslips]

5/6
Bedene beats Laaksonen.

[Semper Fidelis]

Good calls on Bedene, Lopez, and Morita man! Are these normal plays for you Step, as in one unit plays? I know you release large plays every now and then, just wasn't sure if these were high confidence or not. You're not a bad capper man, you should keep a running total for your record for wins/losses and units won, etc. This will give you more transparency in the forum and possibly validate you for being a good capper if you show steady and consistent profits week after week. Not hating by any means, just a bit of advice - good luck on all your plays today and in the future bud!

[stepanekslips]

7/4
Pavlyuchenkova beats Kerber.

5/4
Cilic beats Dimitrov.

11/10
Matosevic beats Querrey.

[stepanekslips]

Good calls on Bedene, Lopez, and Morita man! Are these normal plays for you Step, as in one unit plays? I know you release large plays every now and then, just wasn't sure if these were high confidence or not. You're not a bad capper man, you should keep a running total for your record for wins/losses and units won, etc. This will give you more transparency in the forum and possibly validate you for being a good capper if you show steady and consistent profits week after week. Not hating by any means, just a bit of advice - good luck on all your plays today and in the future bud!

Hello Team America, these are one unit bets.

[stepanekslips]

Yea Im a balla.

10/11

+4.5 Butler Bulldogs @ Villanova Wildcats.

[stepanekslips]

11/10
Cepelova beats Friedsam.

[stepanekslips]

Slayed the books in live betting today woooooooooooooooooooop. Im not one to become careless though and will continue to choose carefully.

11/10
Leafs beat Redwings.

6/5
Gasquet beats Monfils.

[stepanekslips]

5/4
Pennetta beats Bouchard.

11/10
Mahut beats Chardy.

[matt1216]

Keep up the good work bud!

[stepanekslips]

11/10
Lopez beats Hewitt.

[stepanekslips]

8/11
Kerber beats Jankovic.

[stepanekslips]

Just pathetic. Im a loser and should quit gambling for lyfe!
+6.64 units

[stepanekslips]

EVS
Nishikori beats Cilic.

5/2
Flipkens beats Ivanovic.

[stepanekslips]

6/5
Granollers beats Paire.

[matt1216]

Granola hasnt looked well, plus he's played rather lower competition. I think the jump in talent with Paire is to much

[stepanekslips]

If they both come out today that is just WRONG. (ahahaa double entendre!)

Granola hasnt looked well, plus he's played rather lower competition. I think the jump in talent with Paire is to much

[stepanekslips]

If they both come out today that is just WRONG. (ahahaa double entendre!)

Its closer than I though; it must be a fix ahahaha.

[stepanekslips]

10/11
FC Bayern Munich (+2.0) @ Zalgiris.

[stepanekslips]

9/4
Mayer beats Monfils.

[stepanekslips]

10/11
Fenerbahce Ulker +3.5 @ Olympiacos.

29/10
ML

[stepanekslips]

11/10
Venus Williams beats Ivanovic.