any value in this?
-
-
Considering they play 5 sets, no.Comment -
In all seriousness, you're betting -10.5 games, in which case I think the line is very tricky. I see something like 6-2, 6-3, 6-2, which is obviously exactly where the books think it'll be as well.Comment -
Berankis is an underachiever. Would not be surprised if this covered with a game or two to spare. Before Winston-Salem, he was having problems winning GAMES, not matches ... GAMES. 6-1, 6-0 to Roger-Vasselin and 6-1, 6-2 to Lu. He's got talent and he played Murray within seven games in Australia in losing in straights. Murray donated three service games though.
It's -10 most places though, so you should shop around ... also might think about going the under route at 26.5 instead if you think Djokovic smacks him.Comment -
Leaning towards Djokovic -11.5 games (+233) and over 25.5 total games (-151). As long as Berankis doesn't win exactly 7 games, I'll profit.Comment -
Although that's only 10.88% return and pretty pointless
Comment -
$890 on exactly three sets being played @ $1.33
$200 on Berankis +2.5 sets @ $5.46 w Pinnacle
If Djokovic wins in three sets, I win $94
If either player wins in four or five sets, I win $2.
If Berankis wins in three sets, I win $1185
If Berankis wins a set and the match isn't completed (due to a retirement), I win $892Comment -
Where did you get -300 for under 3.5 sets?Comment -
Sorry for not saying, but I find these sorts of inconsistent/value odds all the time, and the moment I mention the agency to others, the bookmaker wakes up to itself and gets rid of the value, so I'd prefer to keep it to myself.
I also got the same odds in the Kohlschreiber game for three sets, and the same odds are also available in the Nadal game for three sets.Comment -
Middleman what book are you at? Im at Pinny
I ended up playing under 27.5 sets at -147 and cashed easilyComment
