Hi guys. My tennis Lay bet was voided @Betdaq. I'm a newbie in sports betting. So I need your help in order to know whether their voiding is not against their tennis betting rules or not.
http://www.betdaq.com/UI/3.54//Common/PopUpWindowPage.aspx?tabId=rulesTab&page FragmentId
>>Part 3 - BETDAQ Rules - 28. TENNIS
>> 28.2 Should a player fail to compete in an individual match or an event, all wagers involving that player
will be void. In the event of a match starting but not being completed, the player progressing to the next round will be deemed the winner; unless, less than one set has been completed in which case all wagers relating to that match will be void.
According to this, tennis betting rules @Betdaq is so-called 1 Set. My bet is Lay 3-0 (set betting) on Martin Klizan v Michael Russell. Russel withdrawed in 4th set. So my Lay bet stands because one set has been completed. And 3-0 is not correct set betting because the match progressed to 4th set.
But Betdaq voided the bet. Is this not against their rules ?
http://www.betdaq.com/UI/3.54//Common/PopUpWindowPage.aspx?tabId=rulesTab&page FragmentId
>>Part 3 - BETDAQ Rules - 28. TENNIS
>> 28.2 Should a player fail to compete in an individual match or an event, all wagers involving that player
will be void. In the event of a match starting but not being completed, the player progressing to the next round will be deemed the winner; unless, less than one set has been completed in which case all wagers relating to that match will be void.
According to this, tennis betting rules @Betdaq is so-called 1 Set. My bet is Lay 3-0 (set betting) on Martin Klizan v Michael Russell. Russel withdrawed in 4th set. So my Lay bet stands because one set has been completed. And 3-0 is not correct set betting because the match progressed to 4th set.
But Betdaq voided the bet. Is this not against their rules ?