Indian Wells: I SPY!

**Hardcoar** · 03-13-13, 05:22 PM

Originally posted by dalogester

not wrong? its at 31 currently.

Sigh...

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

March 13th
Tsonga-Raonic Under 25 [-115]

Might add another later.

Originally posted by MasterBet

Dont get this bet pal...
Under 25 here its same like Raonic -1.5 @ 4.20 (1.5x) & Tsonga -1.5 @ 2.60 (2.5x)

and thet give you more profit then -115,and also if this game going to 3 sets this under is done,we dont really think that can be result like 6-1 / 3-6 / 6-2 this is not WTA.

please fix me if i wrong in my tho'!..

good luck EP

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-13-13, 06:36 PM

Originally posted by matt1216

Last time these two faced it went to a super tie breaker 3 sets. Not sure why you went two. I know it's after the fact, but these 2 will probably go the distance everytime out.

One meeting hardly yields enough to say they're "going to go the distance" every time they play. Happened to wind up that way today, but none of the sets were TBs - so if one guy took care of business in straights, it would go under 25 and that is what I was looking at here as I did not think there would be more than one TB in this match.

I have no problem taking this a lot when you've got guys like Raonic-Tsonga on a tad bit slower court where you're going to get a couple breaks of serve, If it's an indoor court where both serves could dominate, I'd never think under - but the conditions + play of Tsonga especially having been broken a few times in each match made it worth the try for me. Wound up getting it at +110. A loss is a loss.

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-13-13, 09:56 PM

Adding ....

Sharapova-Errani Under 19 [-125]

**OhMyEli** · 03-13-13, 11:09 PM

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

Adding ....

Sharapova-Errani Under 19 [-125]

Line moving the other way, 19 seems too low but I tailed anyway, I feel like Errani isn't getting enough credit here. I guess we'll see, I think the first set will be 6-4 or higher then hopefully Sharapova shuts it down 6-2 the second set.

**matt1216** · 03-13-13, 11:12 PM

I'm sharapova is on 6-2 6-3 very possible.

**matt1216** · 03-13-13, 11:13 PM

These guys are forcing this to be a long night with all the 3 setters

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-13-13, 11:16 PM

Damn they just split it up to 19.5. Fukk.

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-13-13, 11:19 PM

March 14th
Wozniacki +5 [+100]

*Have to wait to see some men's lines hung for the QFs, but pretty likely to take something on Del Potro against Murray depending on the price.

**Hardcoar** · 03-14-13, 12:05 AM

The lines movement will be particularly interesting in that match-up, because at least to me, it's very hard to call.

Potro opens @ ~4 (+300 for you crazy Americans) and drops to @ 3.25 pre match is my wild guess.

Do [sic] laugh too hard!

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 12:59 AM

Wtf is sharapova doing

**OhMyEli** · 03-14-13, 01:03 AM

Yup, tailed for no reason, saw the result. Not bashing you EP, but women typically don't put up consistently good matches versus decent opponents. It's biological, inconsistency, up there with their problems driving and decision making

**davopnz** · 03-14-13, 01:13 AM

how bout joker under 20.5(local line) i think querrey is a terrible player, my only concern is whether or not joker shows up but its so late over there i can see him wanting to punish butt munch querrey. thoughts?

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 01:16 AM

Originally posted by OhMyEli

Yup, tailed for no reason, saw the result. Not bashing you EP, but women typically don't put up consistently good matches versus decent opponents. It's biological, inconsistency, up there with their problems driving and decision making

Ya hammered the Nail in the coffin on that one amen!

**Sharp Snake** · 03-14-13, 01:31 AM

Originally posted by davopnz

how bout joker under 20.5(local line) i think querrey is a terrible player, my only concern is whether or not joker shows up but its so late over there i can see him wanting to punish butt munch querrey. thoughts?

why do you hate querrey so much? he might be one of the most reliable players on tour. His serve is good enough to beat most players worse than him, and his groundstrokes arent good enough to beat most players better than him. Cash cow most of the time.

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 01:33 AM

Originally posted by Sharp Snake

why do you hate querrey so much? he might be one of the most reliable players on tour. His serve is good enough to beat most players worse than him, and his groundstrokes arent good enough to beat most players better than him. Cash cow most of the time.

Not this year, so far anyways. He's been alright. Djoker will most likely 6-4 6-3 him.

**Sharp Snake** · 03-14-13, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by matt1216

Not this year, so far anyways. He's been alright. Djoker will most likely 6-4 6-3 him.

The only bad loss he has this year was Matosevic. Gulbis was/is red hot and then he lost to two players who are better than he is in Raonic and Wawrinka. Pretty standard from Querrey.

**davopnz** · 03-14-13, 02:08 AM

amazing. querrey is horrific, has the mental capacity of a 12 year. i love betting on overs/tiebreaks when he plays bums because he is SO bad and i love fading him again good players because he is simply horrific. I am only hesitant tonight because joker has been toying with his opponents and he may get some satisfaction toying with querrey like the 12 year old boy he is. big gumby giant

**Sharp Snake** · 03-14-13, 02:09 AM

Originally posted by davopnz

amazing. querrey is horrific, has the mental capacity of a 12 year. i love betting on overs/tiebreaks when he plays bums because he is SO bad and i love fading him again good players because he is simply horrific. I am only hesitant tonight because joker has been toying with his opponents and he may get some satisfaction toying with querrey like the 12 year old boy he is. big gumby giant

i asked why? By just saying he's horrific multiple times doesnt add any validity to your opinion.

**davopnz** · 03-14-13, 02:26 AM

because he's terrible

**Hardcoar** · 03-14-13, 07:54 AM

Originally posted by OhMyEli

Yup, tailed for no reason, saw the result. Not bashing you EP, but women typically don't put up consistently good matches versus decent opponents. It's biological, inconsistency, up there with their problems driving and decision making

Originally posted by matt1216

Ya hammered the Nail in the coffin on that one amen!

JK?

**OhMyEli** · 03-14-13, 09:55 AM

Originally posted by Hardcoar

JK?

Is it not obvious? Biological?

**Hardcoar** · 03-14-13, 12:50 PM

Their physical weakness and inconsistency in tennis – certainly.

Their driving skills and decision making – Not quite as obviously.

**OhMyEli** · 03-14-13, 03:34 PM

Originally posted by Hardcoar

Their physical weakness and inconsistency in tennis – certainly.

Their driving skills and decision making – Not quite as obviously.

I was talking "obviously" on whether or not I was joking...

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 05:03 PM

Originally posted by Hardcoar

Their physical weakness and inconsistency in tennis – certainly.

Their driving skills and decision making – Not quite as obviously.

I says pardon?! I can't sleep a wink when the girlfriend is driving, there good at a lot of other things!!!! Driving a not one of them.

**bigdrov1x** · 03-14-13, 05:30 PM

Originally posted by matt1216

I says pardon?! I can't sleep a wink when the girlfriend is driving, there good at a lot of other things!!!! Driving a not one of them.

Ha Ha true that. When I am at the wheel, my girl sleeps like a baby. When she is driving, I am like more alert than she is, sleep is out of the question. And she wonders why I hate taking long road trips. If she drove with any skill or safety in mind, I might be able to sleep. You cannot say anything of risk an argument, and that is another can of worms in itself. LOL

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-14-13, 06:20 PM

Del Potro +190

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 06:49 PM

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

Del Potro +190

Good luck man, he's definitely in form

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-14-13, 08:35 PM

Damn it. So busy at work this week I didn't even get a chance to look at things and realize this was now scheduled tomorrow because of the bitch bailouts. Oh well, gives me something to look forward to tomorrow. I think the price is right to try Del Potro here. Murray has had some wobbly moments in a couple of his matches and his serve has looked breakable again. Delpo has dominated lesser/tired opponents, so tough to truly know how he does with the class step up against Murray. Think it's important for him to start fast and win the 1st set. He's a better front runner in my opinion against the top guys. He normally responds well if he loses the 1st set with a strong 2nd set, but continually putting yourself down a set against the top tier guys is not a recipe for success.

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 08:54 PM

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

Damn it. So busy at work this week I didn't even get a chance to look at things and realize this was now scheduled tomorrow because of the bitch bailouts. Oh well, gives me something to look forward to tomorrow. I think the price is right to try Del Potro here. Murray has had some wobbly moments in a couple of his matches and his serve has looked breakable again. Delpo has dominated lesser/tired opponents, so tough to truly know how he does with the class step up against Murray. Think it's important for him to start fast and win the 1st set. He's a better front runner in my opinion against the top guys. He normally responds well if he loses the 1st set with a strong 2nd set, but continually putting yourself down a set against the top tier guys is not a recipe for success.

Got the feeling this goes 3 sets with a 16-14 win at the end haha

**matt1216** · 03-14-13, 09:50 PM

Lets go nadal!

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-15-13, 08:15 PM

Delpo

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-15-13, 10:29 PM

And 1 ...

Sharapova-Kirilenko Ends in 3 Sets +190

**davopnz** · 03-16-13, 09:39 PM

how bout the over in the doubles final?

**Hardcoar** · 03-17-13, 06:15 AM

Looks pretty damn good to me...

**EaglesPhan36** · 03-17-13, 12:28 PM

March 17th
Wozniacki +5 [-125]