Did anyone else play Bellucci +1.5 sets? I have a question.

PharaohUB · 10-24-12, 01:26 PM

I dunno if pushing this is a good idea though, because they might just cancel the bet altogether due to a "bad line". Grrr.

Dmoneytx · 10-24-12, 01:35 PM

That was a crap line Ph!! How can a guy freaking -2k be only around -400 winning in straights??????!!!
Of course the guy who is -2000 or -3000 or something retarded SHOULD win in straights! So to get a +250 payout on Craplucci, meant Fed was -1.5 sets @ -400???? That makes NO sense at all!! None.

So let me get this right, the guy who was is favored -2000 is only -400 to win in straights??? Ph, that makes no sense man. That prop should of been around Fed -1.5 sets @ -800 or even higher IMO. I guess they must of thought that Craplucci might push one set and win it??? Hmmm..........

Do you want to push it???? I don't know. The books online can be so shady man, that's up to you. They posted the +250 and we both know they will only payout the +250. It was not a good line in the get go really, but good job for hitting it.

PS. If you DO push the subject to them, how on earth could they say Bellucci +1.5 sets at ONLY +250 is a bad line??? If anything, THEY are the ones paying out much less than what they should! If anyone got a crappy line with Bell winning, it was the customer. So, maybe you do push it????

Good luck if you do.

PharaohUB · 10-24-12, 01:44 PM

I dont know what to do. If you think about it what happens to the people who played -400 and they catch it? They would cancel the bet. They arent going to cancel the -400 and they pay me out at +800 or whatever it should have been. Has a precedence ever been set in a scenario where the player won on a bad line? I feel kind of stupid. I should probably post this over in the sportbook forum.