A sharp player opens an account, and has his limits severely limited. In succession, he opens 3 additional accounts under the names of family members. Each account in sequence makes the same style of bets, and has the limits lowered.
On the 4th account, the book identifies this account as related to the other 3. The book cancels the player's winnings, and refunds the deposit.
Fair or foul: Can a player use a family member's identity to circumvent reduced limits?
On the 4th account, the book identifies this account as related to the other 3. The book cancels the player's winnings, and refunds the deposit.
Fair or foul: Can a player use a family member's identity to circumvent reduced limits?