An Honest Question about BetUS

iceminers26 · 12-04-10, 12:06 AM

BetUs sucks, slow pay tactics to the fullest

BChrisB · 12-05-10, 01:14 AM

Justin's new video says it all. I hope they go to F now.

Santo · 12-05-10, 02:10 AM

Profiling the players isn't uncommon, as long as it's the same margins players are free to play either side. Not sure what the latest developments are mind...

skrtelfan · 12-05-10, 08:32 AM

If dealing dual lines got you an F Bodog should be an F too. The dual line sthing is shitty but nowhere near the worst thing BetUS does.

gangeriver · 12-05-10, 11:09 AM

Well, anyone explain this? I know a book having a offline website since middle of July also it hasn't been paying since June
this book is still "D-" it steals players money (deposits) They was working with Jazz and Jazz doesn't want to take responsible.

It seems Betus steals only freebets at least which pays your deposit. Anyone explain which book should become F firstly?
Becoming F is not so easy.I think at least they should steal your deposit

BChrisB · 12-05-10, 03:15 PM

Player profiling is wrong (though I know it's done,) however, deliberately shaving and/or inflating lines to take part in a scam system shows deliberate attempt to defraud. That should also be immediate grounds for an F rating.

tomcowley · 12-05-10, 03:18 PM

No, running the Nigerian scam on the instant deposit guy should be an automatic F.

ABEHONEST · 12-06-10, 12:37 PM

Originally posted by BChrisB

Player profiling is wrong (though I know it's done,) however, deliberately shaving and/or inflating lines to take part in a scam system shows deliberate attempt to defraud. That should also be immediate grounds for an F rating.

I have to disagree.IF you have been clobbering the Book?
Then, that is a tactic they can use on you to limit your chances to further damage them. yet, you can refuse the adjusted play. That is why it's a democratic run business.
YOU, still have that option!

yisman · 12-06-10, 12:56 PM

BChrisB, I disagree. I don't think this makes them an F.

it's shady, sure, but to be an F requires a lot more than this.

BChrisB · 12-06-10, 02:53 PM

Disagree all you want but if this were the Better Business Bureau, I can almost guarantee that taking part in one of the biggest internet handicapping scams on the net at the moment would give them an automatic F rating.

skrtelfan · 12-07-10, 09:16 AM

While I agree Morrison's system isn't a winner, how is it any more or less of a scam than any other tout? I believe dealing dual lines is fraudulent in itself, particularly when books like Bodog and BetUS advertise lines on public line feeds that few people get, but I don't think having the dual lines linked to the affiliate with whom you signed up is any different than dealing a half point worse on all public favorites and switching you to a normal line feed once it's clear you're not there to bet Pats -4 when every other book has -3.5.

Kindred · 12-07-10, 11:56 AM

Sorry for the stupid question but I looked at that other thread and couldn't find it. Where is justin7's video about this Betus scandal, can anyone give me a link to it please, Thanks

gangeriver · 12-07-10, 01:25 PM

http://video.sbrforum.com/video-10047-BetUS+Warning.html

pauluk · 12-07-10, 02:46 PM

Why sbr cant send all information about fraud at betus to its licensing autorities??

yisman · 12-07-10, 03:02 PM

Originally posted by BChrisB

Disagree all you want but if this were the Better Business Bureau, I can almost guarantee that taking part in one of the biggest internet handicapping scams on the net at the moment would give them an automatic F rating.

Nonsense.

What's left for books that out and out steal deposits?

BChrisB · 12-07-10, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by yisman

Nonsense. What's left for books that out and out steal deposits?

Their two sides of the same coin. It's stealing and ripping players off no matter which way it's done.

yisman · 12-07-10, 08:29 PM

No, one is much worse than the other.

BChrisB · 12-07-10, 08:33 PM

Originally posted by yisman

No, one is much worse than the other.

Arguably yes, that's why one should be an F and the other an F-