Banking question - What's your take on this rule

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • djefferis
    SBR MVP
    • 08-16-08
    • 1201

    #1
    Banking question - What's your take on this rule
    Ok, here's the breakdown, xfer 1600 from BO to BetJM last week. I am offered 15 percent cash w a 4x ro and specifically decline to keep my options open in event I want to xfer back out.

    Today, request xfer to a 3rd book of half my acct funds and am declined based on the following rule:

    Bet Jamaica charges no fees on in coming or out going transfers.
    4x rollover in the sportsbook or 15x rollover in the casino is required for banking withdrawals or must be sent out via book transfer.

    My reading of this is no xfer in and payout via means that are not book to book w/o a 4x ro. BUT if you xfer out book 2 book to any book, no ro to meet.

    Find out no, must meet 4x regardless (I am at around 2k in action), fine..I am reasonable. In this case they admit I would have gotten 15 percent with the same 4x I have to meet anyway, so who would turn down free money. Ask to apply and am told no, I declined.

    Is it me, or is this shady. I mean clearly if funds would be held 4x regardless, who would decline a free 240 dollars. And if the rule says OR doesn't that mean the previous sentence has an exception?


    Still like them, but cmon...
  • socalaaron
    Restricted User
    • 07-22-09
    • 200

    #2
    Betjm has been doing this for book 2 book transfers for as long as I remember...
    Comment
    • pokerplayer22
      SBR MVP
      • 05-09-09
      • 1207

      #3
      Thats seems very odd to me. I would call and ask to talk to Scotty. From my experience, he seems very reasonable and will credit your acct with the 15% that you would have taken if you knew you had to roll your money over 4x anyway
      Comment
      • djefferis
        SBR MVP
        • 08-16-08
        • 1201

        #4
        Will be calling, got no where with their clerks.

        I understand why a RO, but it is clear as day with the OR in that sentence.

        I like the try to steal winnings too, they offered to send back the original 1600 on the phone...wonder if they would do the same to someone who LOST and return their original stake.
        Comment
        • Hareeba!
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 07-01-06
          • 37297

          #5
          I'd say there is a small difference
          If you accept the 15% you have to rollover an extra $240 x 4
          Comment
          • djefferis
            SBR MVP
            • 08-16-08
            • 1201

            #6
            Ok, so under 1k in extra ro would get me 240 cash...

            Again, would a majority of posters turn down that cash for those conditions?!? I think not (espc after making 6k+ in wagers)
            Comment
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...